Last Bond Movie You Watched

1305306308310311332

Comments

  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,187
    Spectre (2015)

    My girlfriend and I had, throughout the last year, watched CR and SF together. Over the weekend she said she wanted to give Craig's newest a shot. I've found these viewings to be incredibly interesting. Having someone else with me in the audience, for whatever reason, tends to highlight some aspects of the movie that I'd overlook when watching solo, and it also heightens the excitement of other aspects. It is as if, in some ways, since she is watching it for the first time I too am experiencing things again in a "fresh" way. Background: She really, really liked both CR and SF with a slight preference for the former, which I think she genuinely loved.

    This viewing of Spectre was even more of a let down than the last. I've never felt as harshly toward it as some on these boards, but it has consistently hovered somewhere in the bottom third of my rankings ever since it was released. Furthermore, and I'll quote her best I can, my girlfriend found the film both "silly in a way that doesn't totally fit with Craig's interpretation of the character -- jarring." She also said it wasn't "particularly well written" and that the overall plot wasn't "very compelling or exciting." She even used the word "boring" to describe it, adding that there were a few exceptions, including the pre-title sequence (which she thought was thrilling and exciting on multiple levels, given that she is of Mexican heritage). As for some positives: she enjoyed the cinematography as well as Craig's performance throughout, noting that he handles the dryer sardonic moments of humor a lot more naturally and deftly than the more overt moments of silliness that she derided earlier.

    Her and I are in agreement about most of it. Obviously I have some more thorough ideas simply due to the fact that I'm a huge fan of the series, but she's a savvy cinephile in her own right so her observations are pretty accurate. One thing I noticed more on this viewing than in earlier viewings was the weakness of the writing, particularly in the way it jumps and leaps from plot point to plot point. Moneypenny shows up and throws out that line "I think you've got a secret," for almost no reason whatsoever other than to push the film toward the reveal of M's final message for Bond. There are many equally jarring moments like that in the script. Of course, I hate almost everything about the Blofeld angle, but that has been well documented by me and others on this forum so I won't belabor it.

    I agree with her about the cinematography by and large, with an * noting that some of the color palette ("filter") choices hamper what is otherwise a very textural image with some beautiful compositions and uses of lighting. The Monica Belucci scene, for example, is absolutely breathtaking, as she walks out onto the lawn with the curtains blowing in the wind behind her.

    As with my last viewings, the film absolutely dies once the lair has been blown up, and it could be argued it dies before that. The torture scene is shot really interestingly, but there isn't much beyond that to like because of the angle the film takes toward Blofeld, toward Madeline and Bond's relationship, and on. Furthermore, the action sequences, while "impressive" frankly are not that exciting. Exceptions are parts of the pre-title sequence and the fight on the train which I think is absolutely brilliant and one of the better fights in the series. I enjoy most of the train stuff, actually, although some of the dialogue/writing is a bit weak (a trend). The car chase is beautiful, but there is no thrill. None. The way it is filmed, the ebb and flow of the action, the intercutting of Moore-esque silliness that cannot and does not work in the context of this Bond, the deadness of the city (which is admittedly very thematically and aesthetically compelling, but doesn't make the action feel like it has stakes). The escape from the lair is also a joke in terms of writing and execution as well. And, of course, everything back in London is dire.

    Lastly, there's still a lot I like about the film, namely in the smaller moments and pleasures. The textural image that I mentioned, as if you can reach out and touch it. The curtains blowing in the breeze covering Madeline's face as she lies on the bed. The way Bond pulls out his pistol as they wait in the desert. The suits. The framing. The use of mirrors and veils and other such images throughout. The little things like that I enjoy quite a bit, but overall the film slips further in my estimation. There's something "dead" about it.

    Good review, @ThighsOfXenia!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    edited November 2019 Posts: 4,025
    Licence To Kill

    Have always had a love/hate relationship with this film. I never felt it realised the potential of Dalton's Bond after the brilliant TLD.

    I still feel that way but after a recent Bondathon I'd put this higher than any of the Brosnan films.

    It has some scenes I really don't like and Dalton's performance sometimes misses the mark, especially when his dodgy accent comes through.

    But when it's good it's a cracking Bond film. The whole Wavecrest sequence is the best thing in the film. Intense and beautifully edited. The PTS is also really cool.

    Thankfully it's got a wonderful supporting cast. Robert Davi is pure class and Carey Lowell is one of my favourite Bond girls. And of course features one of Robert Llewellyn's best performances as Q.

    Michael Kamen's score is found wanting but it just about works in it's own way.

    I think the title sequence should have been a complete revamp instead of the godawful old fashioned tired one we got. Perhaps an instrumental theme instead of the ill fitting song.
  • Posts: 7,507
    Licence To Kill

    Have always had a love/hate relationship with this film. I never felt it realised the potential of Dalton's Bond after the brilliant TLD.

    I still feel that way but after a recent Bondathon I'd put this higher than any of the Brosnan films.

    It has some scenes I really don't like and Dalton's performance sometimes misses the mark, especially when his dodgy accent comes through.

    But when it's good it's a cracking Bond film. The whole Wavecrest sequence is the best thing in the film. Intense and beautifully edited. The PTS is also really cool.

    Thankfully it's got a wonderful supporting cast. Robert Davi is pure class and Carey Lowell is one of my favourite Bond girls. And of course features one of Robert Llewellyn's best performances as Q.

    Michael Kamen's score is found wanting but it just about works in it's own way.

    I think the title sequence should have been a complete revamp instead of the godawful old fashioned tired one we got. Perhaps an instrumental theme instead of the ill fitting song.

    Do agree regarding Kamen, it was always the weak spot of LTK, but definitely disagree about Gladys Knights song, one of my favourites and so much better than aha and TLD! Binders title sequence was an improvement too, but it was definitively time for a change of titles designer (and I was Hopi g for a change again as I think Kleinman has run out of ideas!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Licence To Kill

    Have always had a love/hate relationship with this film. I never felt it realised the potential of Dalton's Bond after the brilliant TLD.

    I still feel that way but after a recent Bondathon I'd put this higher than any of the Brosnan films.

    It has some scenes I really don't like and Dalton's performance sometimes misses the mark, especially when his dodgy accent comes through.

    But when it's good it's a cracking Bond film. The whole Wavecrest sequence is the best thing in the film. Intense and beautifully edited. The PTS is also really cool.

    Thankfully it's got a wonderful supporting cast. Robert Davi is pure class and Carey Lowell is one of my favourite Bond girls. And of course features one of Robert Llewellyn's best performances as Q.

    Michael Kamen's score is found wanting but it just about works in it's own way.

    I think the title sequence should have been a complete revamp instead of the godawful old fashioned tired one we got. Perhaps an instrumental theme instead of the ill fitting song.

    Do agree regarding Kamen, it was always the weak spot of LTK, but definitely disagree about Gladys Knights song, one of my favourites and so much better than aha and TLD! Binders title sequence was an improvement too, but it was definitively time for a change of titles designer (and I was Hopi g for a change again as I think Kleinman has run out of ideas!

    Yeah, with the change to a new hard edged Bond film a revamped title sequence would have been a better move instead of sticking with the old (and tired) style.
  • Posts: 12,475


    Been avoiding watching Bond films in whole since DN on Bond Day in an effort to save them for a Bondathon leading up to NTTD next year, but I can't resist revisiting some favorite scenes lately. I love this part in TMWTGG so much. It's a flawed Bond film, but it has some seriously awesome moments like this one. TMWTGG has grown on me a lot lately.
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    FoxRox wrote: »


    Been avoiding watching Bond films in whole since DN on Bond Day in an effort to save them for a Bondathon leading up to NTTD next year, but I can't resist revisiting some favorite scenes lately. I love this part in TMWTGG so much. It's a flawed Bond film, but it has some seriously awesome moments like this one. TMWTGG has grown on me a lot lately.

    Me too. It certainly flawed but it does have some good stuff in it.

    I think the best thing about it is Moore's excellent performance.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    FoxRox wrote: »


    Been avoiding watching Bond films in whole since DN on Bond Day in an effort to save them for a Bondathon leading up to NTTD next year, but I can't resist revisiting some favorite scenes lately. I love this part in TMWTGG so much. It's a flawed Bond film, but it has some seriously awesome moments like this one. TMWTGG has grown on me a lot lately.

    Me too. It certainly flawed but it does have some good stuff in it.

    I think the best thing about it is Moore's excellent performance.

    His best, although FYEO and OP come close.
  • FoxRox wrote: »


    Been avoiding watching Bond films in whole since DN on Bond Day in an effort to save them for a Bondathon leading up to NTTD next year, but I can't resist revisiting some favorite scenes lately. I love this part in TMWTGG so much. It's a flawed Bond film, but it has some seriously awesome moments like this one. TMWTGG has grown on me a lot lately.

    Me too. It certainly flawed but it does have some good stuff in it.

    I think the best thing about it is Moore's excellent performance.

    His best, although FYEO and OP come close.

    Yeah, I think it's definitely these three (I love how easy the role is for him in MR too, that uber-confidence and ease is infectious, so that's an honorable mention).
  • Agent_47Agent_47 Canada
    Posts: 330
    Just finished watching Tomorrow Never Dies, had been awhile since I last seen it. After having watched Casino Royale, Quantum and Spectre recently it felt like a nice change of pace.

    Our current era just lacks the exciting and unapologetic pace of the Brosnan years for me. TND's script is probably just one long storyboard but it's a hell of a lot of fun.
  • Posts: 7,507
    MOONRAKER
    Having just received latest issue of 007 magazine special on it, I decided to watch Rogers 4th entry (re-entry?)
    Really enjoyed this showing! Good fun, far more so than TSWLM! I was thinking as I watched, if you removed the gondola chase, the Rio sequence, and tightened up some of the editing, this would be much improved.
    As it is though, there is loads to enjoy, pts, Basseys theme, Lonsdales Hugo Drax, the centrifuge scene, boat chase, Corinnes Dufours eerie death scene, Derek Meddings excellent effects, and best of all John Barry, this is really entertraining Bond movie! Love it!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    MOONRAKER
    Having just received latest issue of 007 magazine special on it, I decided to watch Rogers 4th entry (re-entry?)
    Really enjoyed this showing! Good fun, far more so than TSWLM! I was thinking as I watched, if you removed the gondola chase, the Rio sequence, and tightened up some of the editing, this would be much improved.
    As it is though, there is loads to enjoy, pts, Basseys theme, Lonsdales Hugo Drax, the centrifuge scene, boat chase, Corinnes Dufours eerie death scene, Derek Meddings excellent effects, and best of all John Barry, this is really entertraining Bond movie! Love it!

    You can get a seamless cut from Bond meeting Holly in Venice to Bond infiltrating the glass factory that evening by just jumping a chapter on the Bluray. Omitting the godawful Gondola sequence!

    Still a massively entertaining Bond epic despite all the silliness 👍
  • Posts: 7,507
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    MOONRAKER
    Having just received latest issue of 007 magazine special on it, I decided to watch Rogers 4th entry (re-entry?)
    Really enjoyed this showing! Good fun, far more so than TSWLM! I was thinking as I watched, if you removed the gondola chase, the Rio sequence, and tightened up some of the editing, this would be much improved.
    As it is though, there is loads to enjoy, pts, Basseys theme, Lonsdales Hugo Drax, the centrifuge scene, boat chase, Corinnes Dufours eerie death scene, Derek Meddings excellent effects, and best of all John Barry, this is really entertraining Bond movie! Love it!

    You can get a seamless cut from Bond meeting Holly in Venice to Bond infiltrating the glass factory that evening by just jumping a chapter on the Bluray. Omitting the godawful Gondola sequence!

    Still a massively entertaining Bond epic despite all the silliness 👍

    Michael Lonsdales Drax is an overlooked villain. Love his droll delivery of lines, and he has some great ones.
    Enjoyed this so much, I watched The Making of Documentary, with narration by Patrick Macnee.
    Best parts are the genius ideas of Derek Meddings to get certain effects, usin g salt as a smoke trail on a rocket, and best of all, when the space station was destroyed in the film, Derek and co brought the model of it into a room.....and blasted it with a shotgun! Brilliant!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    MOONRAKER
    Having just received latest issue of 007 magazine special on it, I decided to watch Rogers 4th entry (re-entry?)
    Really enjoyed this showing! Good fun, far more so than TSWLM! I was thinking as I watched, if you removed the gondola chase, the Rio sequence, and tightened up some of the editing, this would be much improved.
    As it is though, there is loads to enjoy, pts, Basseys theme, Lonsdales Hugo Drax, the centrifuge scene, boat chase, Corinnes Dufours eerie death scene, Derek Meddings excellent effects, and best of all John Barry, this is really entertraining Bond movie! Love it!

    You can get a seamless cut from Bond meeting Holly in Venice to Bond infiltrating the glass factory that evening by just jumping a chapter on the Bluray. Omitting the godawful Gondola sequence!

    Still a massively entertaining Bond epic despite all the silliness 👍

    Michael Lonsdales Drax is an overlooked villain. Love his droll delivery of lines, and he has some great ones.
    Enjoyed this so much, I watched The Making of Documentary, with narration by Patrick Macnee.
    Best parts are the genius ideas of Derek Meddings to get certain effects, usin g salt as a smoke trail on a rocket, and best of all, when the space station was destroyed in the film, Derek and co brought the model of it into a room.....and blasted it with a shotgun! Brilliant!

    Yeah, the use of salt for the smoke trails was genius.

    The effects in this film are quite stunning. One of the best looking Bond film's with all the money up there on screen. A real Bond epic. I really wonder if the series would have survived without Moore.
  • Posts: 7,507
    ON HER MAJESTYS SECRET SERVICE.
    What else to be said. My annual viewing great as always! BEST BOND MOVIE! No question. Love everything about it. A shout out this time for Michael Reeds cinematography. Beautiful, from the pts beach scrap, to the majestic helicopter flight to Piz Gloria, and the bobsled chase gets a lot of praise, but I must say the stock car sequence is thrillingly staged.
    I was thinking this time, at the devastating finale, would it have been better to finish the movie with Louis Armstrong's theme, or would that have been too much of a downer? Still, they were brave enough to go with that ending, if only they could of went that extra step!
  • thedovethedove hiding in the Greek underworld
    Posts: 5,438
    Just watched CR after many years of not viewing it. I enjoy the first half immensely and even the poker game is well acted and shot by Campbell. Then I find it bogs down a bit with scenes that I don't think were needed. Craig delivers a better performance then I remembered. The script has some witty lines. I forgot how beautiful Murino was. Wow a true beauty. A pity she wasn't featured a bit more as I think she had the acting skill to deliver more in the movie. As it is she really serves as eye candy. I found her delivery of the lines about only meeting bad men like Dimitri and Bond as a call back to Domino's lines in TB.

    I wouldn't say it's in my top 5 of Bond movies but definitely in the top 10 and a good movie with just some pacing issues in the second half.
  • DrunkIrishPoetDrunkIrishPoet The Amber Coast
    Posts: 156
    Spent Xmas in New Orleans; came home and watched LIVE AND LET DIE.
    It was better this time, somehow... although Roger Moore played Bond as a real a--hole.
  • Posts: 9,848
    Ohmss

    Such a good film
  • Posts: 12,475
    Luckily just a couple more weeks for me until my Bondathon begins! Kicking off with DN and FRWL January 12-18 and will enjoy two a week leading up to NTTD.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    SF.... I think it's squeezing itself before GF and CR?...

    OHMSS
    FRWL
    SF
    CR
    GF
    ?????
  • Agent_47Agent_47 Canada
    Posts: 330
    peter wrote: »
    SF.... I think it's squeezing itself before GF and CR?...

    OHMSS
    FRWL
    SF
    CR
    GF
    ?????

    Curious to see where it places in my reranking. I've purposely avoided it so as not to spoil my viewing of Skyfall in concert.
  • Posts: 9,848
    I really need to rewatch the latter Craig films one of these days I know I dislike both but for the life of me I can’t remember why it’s been that long
  • Posts: 7,507
    THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
    For a long time this languished really low, but have somehow come to appreciate it a bit more. Yes, the humour tends to be sub par, (bringing back Sherriff Pepper was a mistake!) but there are nuggets of quality, most of them when Christopher Lee is on screen (though I would have loved to have seen Jack Palance in the role!).
    I don't even mind Bond not appearing in the pts ( though I will not be pleased if rumours come true that 007 doesn't appear in NTTD pts!). The opening has a sense of the macabre about it...and who doesn't like Marc Lawrence returning (he should have been given a regular cameo as a thug!). Action wise this falls way short, apart from the fight scene in the dancers dressing room,(a lot tougher than most of Moore's scraps, guys having head smashed into walls and mirrors!)
    Cast wise, Moore is really good, and his scenes with Lee are a standout, Maud and Britt look lovely, with Maud more alluring,
    Production wise, it looks great, some really excellent visual moments. But you can't help feeling it could have been a lot better. They should have brought in a new Director, and kept the energy crisis stuff out of it. Anyway, not a bad viewing!
  • Posts: 9,848
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
    For a long time this languished really low, but have somehow come to appreciate it a bit more. Yes, the humour tends to be sub par, (bringing back Sherriff Pepper was a mistake!) but there are nuggets of quality, most of them when Christopher Lee is on screen (though I would have loved to have seen Jack Palance in the role!).
    I don't even mind Bond not appearing in the pts ( though I will not be pleased if rumours come true that 007 doesn't appear in NTTD pts!). The opening has a sense of the macabre about it...and who doesn't like Marc Lawrence returning (he should have been given a regular cameo as a thug!). Action wise this falls way short, apart from the fight scene in the dancers dressing room,(a lot tougher than most of Moore's scraps, guys having head smashed into walls and mirrors!)
    Cast wise, Moore is really good, and his scenes with Lee are a standout, Maud and Britt look lovely, with Maud more alluring,
    Production wise, it looks great, some really excellent visual moments. But you can't help feeling it could have been a lot better. They should have brought in a new Director, and kept the energy crisis stuff out of it. Anyway, not a bad viewing!

    Agreed the idea of an assassin going after 007 is interesting enough to be a 2 hour film that the energy stuff really is not needed
  • Posts: 7,507
    There is one reason TMWTGG is a let down compared to what it could have been... and his name is Tom Mankiewicz! Damn, it's such a shame he got to ruin three James Bond films!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    Mathis1 wrote: »
    THE MAN WITH THE GOLDEN GUN.
    For a long time this languished really low, but have somehow come to appreciate it a bit more. Yes, the humour tends to be sub par, (bringing back Sherriff Pepper was a mistake!) but there are nuggets of quality, most of them when Christopher Lee is on screen (though I would have loved to have seen Jack Palance in the role!).
    I don't even mind Bond not appearing in the pts ( though I will not be pleased if rumours come true that 007 doesn't appear in NTTD pts!). The opening has a sense of the macabre about it...and who doesn't like Marc Lawrence returning (he should have been given a regular cameo as a thug!). Action wise this falls way short, apart from the fight scene in the dancers dressing room,(a lot tougher than most of Moore's scraps, guys having head smashed into walls and mirrors!)
    Cast wise, Moore is really good, and his scenes with Lee are a standout, Maud and Britt look lovely, with Maud more alluring,
    Production wise, it looks great, some really excellent visual moments. But you can't help feeling it could have been a lot better. They should have brought in a new Director, and kept the energy crisis stuff out of it. Anyway, not a bad viewing!

    You could argue it was the 'nadir' of the series, but for me Moore's performance rises it above certain other entries..
  • Posts: 7,507
    SKYFALL.
    Well, surprise surprise, I actually enjoyed this viewing of my least favourite Craig Bond movie. It seemed pacier than usual, though I still think there's a lot wrong with it, I seem to be warming to Skyfall a lot more. The action is still poor, but it didnt seem as gloomy as my viewings of it up to now have been. (I will still never forget coming away from the cinema feeling very let down when I saw it first!)
    Be interesting to see my next watch whether it still holds up!
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    Casino Royale

    What a bloody masterpiece this film is!

    Doesn't put a foot wrong and delivers on every aspect in spades. Acting, script, direction and that wonderful score.

    The only problem is no future Bond film will come close to this, including NTTD. It's that good.

    If you don't like this are you really a Bond fan..? 😉
  • LeonardPineLeonardPine The Bar on the Beach
    Posts: 4,025
    Birdleson wrote: »
    If you don't like this are you really a Bond fan..? 😉

    Please, let's not start that.

    Just joking which is why I put the winking face there 😁
  • Posts: 235
    Just watched Goldeneye on Netflix. They got all Pierce Brosnan movies on Netflix.
  • Posts: 12,475
    Birdleson wrote: »
    Mazouni wrote: »
    Just watched Goldeneye on Netflix.

    Me too! First Bond film of the year! This is freaking great. GOLDENEYE moves back into my Top Ten, sadly displacing YOU ONLY LIVE TWICE.

    @Birdleson glad to hear it! As good as YOLT is I find GE consistently stronger across the board myself. A sure-fire Top 10 my whole life as a Bond fan thus far.
Sign In or Register to comment.