It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
After all the craziness of 1968 (political assasinations, anti war riots, race riots) the moon landing was some good and positive stuff to see on TV at the time.
By 1969 Bondmania had run its course and was starting to cool down by the time OHMSS was released at Christmas.
2 years later DAF was released and though we were happy to see Sean back in the saddle, for me the film was a disappointment. Too campy and just plain dumb. It made a crap load of money and convinced EON that the lighter toned 007 ws the way to go in the new decade of the seventies.
The moon landing was more impressive than Bond and his world.
What I did really enjoy about the moon landings though, and there were a few others post Apollo Eleven, were the colour photos that eventually turned up in Time magazine - the colour shots of the astronauts bouncing around on the lunar surface, earth in the background, the US flag planted, the landing module. Those photos were real neat.
It even mentions me and one of my blog articles in the text below the video bar:
Bondologist David Dragonpol writes:
http://thebondologistblog.blogspot.co...
Arthur C. Clarke's "Mysterious" Involvement in 'Moonraker'
Arthur C. Clarke (1917-2008), author of over one hundred books of fiction and non-fiction and broadcaster, seemingly had connections with Ian Fleming's third James Bond novel, MOONRAKER (1955). In JAMES BOND: THE MAN AND HIS WORLD (2005) by Henry Chancellor there is the following passage in the 'Inspirations' section for the novel MOONRAKER:
"The story of the Moonraker rocket targeting London and Bond's attempts to stop it was originally conceived for a film. 'The reason why it breaks so badly in half as a book,' Fleming explained to Joyce Briggs, Rank's script editor at Pinewood, 'is because I had to more or less graft the first half of the book on to my film idea in order to bring it up to the necessary length.' Ian's film idea had been about a German V-2 rocket, which he had updated to an early intercontinental nuclear weapon -- an extremely topical subject, as both the Americans and the Russians were rushing to develop this new technology. As he was not an expert in this field, Ian went to great lengths to make sure his Moonraker rocket was correct, writing to Arthur C. Clarke and the British Interplanetary Society to check his facts about range and accuracy."
There is another video by the same person here, along with another six faked Moon Landing conspiracy theory videos. See here for his James Bond related You Tube videos:
No, sorry don't buy it.
But it is nice to read that Fleming went to some lengths to make his wiring about the Moonraker rocket accurate enough.
@Chrisisall, don't take my Kodachrome away. ;)
When I look back at all the CRAP I learned in high school...
Yeah, I caught it too. Remember: One man's ceiling is another man's floor...
But I still have Paul Simon singing in my head now. ;)
Yes, and I really enjoyed writing that article as a tribute to Arthur C. Clarke back in March 2008. The full article can now be read on The Bondologist Blog. It was a CBn Main Page Article in 2008 too.
Your musical knowledge is second to none, @BeatlesSansEarmuffs.
I appreciate the nod, @Dragonpol, but I must defer to @SirHenry in this field.
Yes, I meant to say second only to @SirHenryLeeChaChing.
Except - in general musical terms - maybe MrEon. Hope he comes back. ;)
would have taken a different turn.
Well, it was going to be the fourth one, but then they went with Thunderball instead. How do you think the series direction would have taken a different turn, @quarrel7? I'm intrigued.