It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
You do make a valid point about Bernard Lee in MR and his final scene being a disservice to this once popular amd beloved character, not that Lee could've done anything about making amends as he died shorty after production and was replaced by Geoffrey Keen. Though Cubby did have a Fleming story up his sleeve with FYEO to correct the misjudged slapstick course of MR afterward. Clearly CR was a one-off and if Barbara Broccoli makes the same mistake again with NTTD as she did with DAD, then they'll be no Fleming material or title to help bail her out a second time.
I won't get into a puritanical debate about Mr Wint showing a perverse pleasure at a bomb being thrust between his legs, the same as I won't get drawn into a debate about Bond slapping Dink on the behind in GF with the line: "Man talk", or even Bond coercing Patricia Fearing into sex in the Shrublands sanatorium. I'll leave that for the modern-day puritans to chew over.
Well, obviously. I wouldn't have said it otherwise.
Yes of course there were, everybody in the world agreed with you, I'm sure ;)
No he wasn't replaced by Keen, and it wasn't really a disservice to his character, that's just what his character did. I think if you get too worried about certain things not being treated with the reverence they deserve when you're watching a fun movie about a handsome superspy battling a guy with metal teeth in space, then you're maybe not approaching these with a mindset that will allow you to enjoy them. They're big silly films, just enjoy them. You're getting into that fan mindset like you see Star Wars fans getting into where they think it must all be treated incredibly seriously and respectfully, losing sight of exactly what the big fun adventure film is actually supposed to be doing.
It's nothing to do with puritanical thinking, I think you've used the wrong term there.
No problem.
I'm in a mixed camp. I think GE was the perfect film for the time. I was ready for a new Bond film, and I think it perfectly delivered on blending classic elements with one or two modern (at the time) ones.
Skyfall, is for me, a touch overrated.
I think the first half is superb, one of the best in the series. When we leave Silva's island it drops off a cliff.
Getting back on thread, the answer is a firm NO. Skyfall is definitely not the best Bond film. Far from it.
The mere suggestion that anyone thinks it could be is slightly offensive to all the early Connery films, and OHMSS, which are the real benchmark to the franchise.
Or they just have different opinions to you. Might be possible?
You're allowed to find it offensive, but it's not an offence against the old films, no. Also they're only films, people can like what they want without being told they're being offensive for doing so. It's just too much.
I think that's a given when you're 38 pages in and everyone has made their opinions clear and repeated.
Also, I wouldn't agree with sentiments that it's somehow "offensive" to the early Connery films, whatever that means, even if I don't like the movie.
Of course this is where subjectivity and differing opinions come in, and I really like Skyfall, but I'd still rate OHMSS higher. Lazenby, while very inexperienced, delivered the emotional stuff in a very effective way, IMO.
Skyfall may be the best Bond film from a pure cinematography standpoint. And it has, IMO, the best scene in the franchise. But I don't think it's the best Bond film.
Which scene is that?
I suppose there are better scenes out there in Bond films, but maybe for me this scene just epitomizes the Bond films so well. A perfect insertion in a 50th anniversary tribute film.
Of course this is all just my opinion and I'm sure many out there will scoff at it. Perhaps I should have said "my favourite" rather than "the best".
It is a great scene no doubt! And there are many of them in Skyfall.
The sequence where Bond follows Patrice into the skyscraper ending with the fight and mysterious shots of Severine is another highlight for me
Absolutely, beautiful scene.
And a sidenote, I really wish we could've seen the deleted sequence where Severine delivers the briefcase to Patrice at the airport. I can understand why they cut it from the final film, but a deleted scene on the DVD would've been cool.
"Home Alone comparison" :))
Your point is?
Funny, for all of the issues I have with the film, that's one that never bothered me. I enjoy seeing them improvise and adapt, which actually pans out in their favor quite remarkably. Protecting M would've been a success if Bond had merely told her to hit the lights when the time came and hide (he should've known Silva would want to grandstand and kill her on his own. Making her actually fight wasn't the best idea.)
It's a funny comparison.
I like to think it's always been Bond's zombie apocalypse plan :D
I've warmed somewhat to the third act at Skyfall. The plotting is dumber than a box of rocks, but at least it's visually spectacular.
(I could say the same about Fields in QoA. She deserved more screen time and she looks more attractive in other films.)
I dont like Skyfall but iv never understood the '' controversy '' of the shower scene.Severine did invite him on the boat and its not like shes shocked or anything when he steps into her shower.Sex between two consenting adults.Whats the problem?
Lol remind me to never invite you onto my boat.
“Officer, he invited me onto his boat, and it is customary then for the guest to immediately get naked and hop into the shower with the host. Two consenting adults, what’s the problem??”