It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
This review makes it sound like a good deal of fun:
http://www.dvdverdict.com/reviews/windandlion.php
"If you ignore the breathtaking license that Milius takes with historical fact—the film is (very) loosely based on actual events—and view the film strictly as a fantastical adventure, The Wind and the Lion is a pretty engaging ride."
When I was in United States Marine Corps Officer Candidates School, they showed us a clip from this film at the start of a class on Marine Corps History. The clip was the scene in which the Marines run through town and assault the palace. It's still one of my favorite movie scenes, and it inspired me to see the whole movie as soon as I was able to get my hands on a copy.
It's true that the film is only loosely based on historical fact. If I'm not mistaken, the real incident occurred during the Presidency of Chester Alan Arthur, but in the movie, Theodore Roosevelt is President. Even so, it's a wildly entertaining romp of a film. And besides, who wants to watch a movie about Chester Alan Arthur?
Waiting impatiently for this one to be released on Blu-Ray.
But as a rip-roaring adventure film it is first-rate. And the Goldsmith score is magnificent.
Re: Chester A. Arthur -- He may have been a forgettable president, but his mutton-chop whiskers were awesome!
Oh man, I just watched the first 30 minutes of the film and found it so cartoonishly hokey... apart from Goldsmith's WONDERFUL score, it just turns me off. I see what's coming; Bergin will come to see what a magnificent man of honour Connery is by the end. What tosh. His character is a dopey butwipe, and I can't continue watching a movie whose main character deserves to be killed like the dog he is.
I'll just get the soundtrack.
:-<
Yes, Lawrence of Arabia it ain't!
I got suckered into buying a copy because I sampled the score on Youtube. I was like, WOW, I guess I need to see it! But right from the beginning Raisuni's men are killing indiscriminately and laughing, then Raisuni beheads two followers for not praising his name while drinking from his well, and then orders the cutting off of some girl's finger somewhere to send to Roosevelt in place of his hostage's finger. Gee, what a nice guy.
I guess I'm just monumentally culturally insensitive... :))
So you criticize the movie for not painting its characters merely in black and white. Well, to each his own.
Sean seemed obsessed with doing big historical period pieces in his '70s post Bond years. Reveling in his middle-age baldness it seems.
Eg Wind And The Lion, Man Who Would Be King, Robin and Marian. Even A Bridge Too Far and Murder On The Orient Express too.
No, actually I don't like the movie for its subject matter. AND the fact that if they were going to play with actual history so liberally, why not give us a rousing adventure with a hero we can like? Otherwise just stick to the facts. This movie wanted it both ways, and that I cannot abide.