›

Should there be books based on Q?

RogerMoore007RogerMoore007
edited December 2013 in Literary 007 Posts: 170
A look at the world through Q's perspective. Would you like it?

Comments

  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    edited December 2013 Posts: 18,348
    No. Enough of these damn spin-offs already.
  • RogerMoore007RogerMoore007
    Posts: 170
    Watch your language @Dragonpol, no need to get so angry.
  • Samuel001Samuel001 Moderator
    edited December 2013 Posts: 13,356
    It's a fair point. I can't see anyone backing this idea personally, or this thread going anywhere.

    We don't want spin-offs, just focus on Bond.
  • DragonpolDragonpol https://thebondologistblog.blogspot.com
    Posts: 18,348
    RogerMoore007 wrote:
    Watch your language @Dragonpol, no need to get so angry.

    Seriously? You clearly don't know me, then. Just joshing, but I guess you're new. I'm just fed up with all of these one sentence threads that are on ever-so pointless subjects, but each to their own and all that jazz.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited December 2013 Posts: 24,264
    Great, another thread that serves the purpose of diluting our archives... :(
    Here.

    Also, what a silly question. What's next? Should M get a book series? Should we read J.W. Pepper's biography? (I buy the film rights to that one. ;-))
This discussion has been closed.