It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
9. Yes, there has been a lack of decent henchmen/women in Craig's tenure. I don't think physical traits are needed to make a memorable one, but I miss them, and believe they can still be achieved with realism.
8. Although we've already seen Craig up against dangerous creatures (scorpion/komodos- Skyfall) he is yet to take on one belonging to the villain. I think it would be cool to see Craig's version of Dr. No's tarantula/Moonraker's anaconda (actually a python) scene.
7. I'm pretty satisfied with the current villains' schemes, but we could always do with an updated take on 'world domination'. I'm sure we'll see it in the near future.
6. The lack of skiing in Craig's tenure gets mentioned a lot in the 'Bond24 wishlist' thread, and I agree. Whether it's actually skiing or something similar, Craig needs to get some snow on his suit. I'd like to see a snow mobile or snowcat chase.
5. The quirky modes of transport are a staple of the Bond films- something I forgot about until just mentioned now- and I truly do miss them. The question is, what hasn't been done yet? I think there's room for some interesting aircraft. Maybe the villain holds his meetings on a massive <a href="http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/b/b2/Iwo_Jima_Osprey.jpg/481px-Iwo_Jima_Osprey.jpg">transverse rotor rotorcraft</a>, or Bond can get around in a <a href="http://static.ddmcdn.com/gif/wingsuit-flying-1.jpg">flying wingsuit</a> or on a <a href="http://students.egfi-k12.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/waterscooter.jpg">waterscooter</a>.
4. Giant lasers- I don't miss them, but they're definitely a minor element of the films which have been lacking since Die Another Day. If we are to see lasers in Craig's tenure, I'd like to think they'd be scaled down to a small size and used for information gathering.
3. The in-jokes that break the fourth wall or become self-conscious such as Vijay playing the Bond theme- I get a very small bit of amusement out of them- but they don't belong in the Craig era. However, I'm all for *subtle* homages or references to previous films, such as in Quantum of solace, where Bond has a Universal Exports card with the name R. Sterling (a reference to his undercover name in The Spy Who Loved Me).
2. Bond walking into M's office and knowing everything about every subject is unrealistic. Sure, he needs to be knowledgeable, but there are limits. This only really got annoying during Roger's tenure- the other Bonds at least showed moments of being uninformed.
1. Expensive lairs seriously need to make comeback, provided they remain plausible. There are some great ideas for lairs in the Bond 'location thread'.
#2) 5 Reasons Goldeneye would've been better with Timothy Dalton
As a kid I used to view GE as Pierce Brosnan's coming out party. And what a coming out party it was. But now as an adult I view Goldeneye more as what should've been a continuation of the James Bond 3rd movie tradition. GE should've been Dalton's Goldfinger, The Spy Who Loved Me and more than anything else Skyfall (both deal with a Bond who is a relic in a new world and a turncoat MI6 agent as a villain). And when you eliminate nostalgia and look at the film unbiasedly GE has alot more in common with The Living Daylights (cold war spy games) and License to Kill (Bond up against a villain who has personally wronged him) than anything in TND, TWINE, or DAD. In many ways GE is a hybrid or Dalton's two films and is a Timothy Dalton Bond film starring Pierce Brosnan. Anyhow check out these 5 points.
All are valid points but I particularly agree with the theory that the advertising campaign in LTK is what really screwed Dalton over.
http://whatculture.com/film/5-reasons-goldeneye-would-have-been-better-with-timothy-dalton.php
I recall an interview with Barbara Broccoli where she stated had Dalton returned he would've starred in at least one more Bond film after GE. I don't have a link. I heard from a poster on this site a long time ago but I doubt they would've recast the role after reintroducing Dalton as 007 after six and a half years.
He wouldn't have been in TWINE. GE and Bond 18. I doubt it would've been TND. They would've tailored it to fit Dalton's Bond.
As she was going to be Natalya originally, I wonder what TND would have been like with Dalts and Pam returning as the old flame.
Seriously? I'd never heard that. I was not a huge fan of Pam, so would have prefered seeing Belluci come back in TND.
Yeah In the earliest script for TND IIRC, Natalya was originally going to be in place of Paris.
I'm glad it never happened though. Natalya is one of my favorite Bond girls. Seeing her killed off would break my heart. much like Tracy.
Not only were we not invested but Teri Hatcher was so annoying alot of people were probably happy that she wouldn't have any more screen time. Natalya on the other hand was not only much more likable than the wooden Ms. Hatcher but we saw her go thru an entire adventure (a well received one at that) with Bond. An adventure where she actually helped Bond and was a useful alley rather than just standing around looking pretty. Her death would have been a bitter one to accept.
"I made my bed...you don't sleep in it anymore"
"No-one can protect me from him...not even you"
"I told you he's a banker...I met him in Zurick"
It didn't help that the character was very one note.
By contrast I love Natalya. Having said that I'm glad she didn't die. Shame Jinx wasn't cast then come to think of it.
One of the worst bits of casting in the series' history.
Easily solved - recast Janus. I mean, Sean Bean with a dodgy posh accent as the main Bond villain - has to be a low-point in the series.
The scene that actually comes to mind for me is the initial meeting between Bond and M/Dench. That would have worked much better with a slightly older Dalton. And since I'm on the fantasy recasting bandwagon, let's ditch Dench and bring in Mirren or even Vanessa Redgrave? The chemistry would have been fantastic.
As for Sean Bean, he is a fine actor but was too young for his background. But he was well suited against Brosnan, much more than he would have been against Dalton. Unless he plays a henchman to a more seasoned villain. But then again it becomes a different movie.
Short hair suits him
True, although I think he was a long way from being past it in 94/95.
You've already said you think Dalton was the worst Bond, but you only have to look at most people's rankings on this site to see that for many fans he's up there as one of the best.
I don't normally defer to IMDB, but since popularity contests seem to carry such weight with you, you might want to consider that TLD is ranked above TND, TWINE, DAD and QoS. So on this basis, given that those films were all big commercial successes that 'connected' with audiences, surely Dalton must have been doing something right?
So LTK divides opinions. It is ranked (incorrectly IMO) as one of the best in the series by some and reviled by others. And on IMDB, it is still ranked more highly than Brosnan's last 3 films.
Isn't it time you learned to love the Daltonator?