It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
That is exactly as I remember it as well. I never recall any female I knew at the time going gooey over Timbo. He was a handsome man of sorts, but he didn't have the X factor that Connery had and that Craig has now. Maybe, as he wasn't one of the beefcake Bonds it had something to do with it, but from the perspective of the ladies he didn't tick enough boxes.
Women who liked Roger also liked Brosnan, but they brought a different kind of Bond to the screen.
This isn't of course without exception. There are bound to be some women who did like Dalton, but he seems to be more popular with a small but hardcore male audience, most of whom are on here. ;-).
He is the cult Bond.
Brosnan definitely had more in the looks dept. than Dalton did. He is and was more conventionally handsome. He appealed far more to the women that I spoke with about it at the time. This definitely contributed to his success in comparison to Dalton. As @NicNac said, the appeal is similar to Moore.
Craig has the raw sex appeal in spades. That was emphasized and established well ahead of the release of CR with the infamous beach shot (which rather was like a Calvin Klein underwear ad to a degree, as well as a throwback to Connery machismo). The raw masculinity of Craig appeals on a quite different and more visceral level imho. The women I've spoken with find Craig attractive, but their reaction when I mention him (and this is a subtle observation on my part) suggests a more sexual attractiveness than what I find when discussing either Brosnan or Moore, where it's more admiration based..
What I have noticed as well though is Moore is almost unanimously remembered more fondly than Brosnan among the women I have spoken with who are old enough to have seen all the films. I am not sure if that is because Dalton replaced Moore, because Craig replaced Brosnan, because of nostalgia for Moore, because of the reboot, or indeed if it's because many have reassessed their appreciation for Brosnan post-Craig.
The franchise went AWOL because of poor management.
Babs & Michael G Wilson pulled out all the stops to make sure Daniel Craig became a hit.
I do believe a level of complacency was settling in during the late 80s, as if the name 'Bond' all by itself would generate a box office hit. So yes Cubby was resting on his laurels, but he had been doing the same for years.
However, as I remember, TLD had as much promotion as the most recent Moore outings. They had Maibaum on script duties, brought on board a popular band of the time - A-ha - to do the main song, employed a stellar cast and had a good budget. So Cubby wasn't messing around. He wanted to launch Dalton in a good film, and succeeded. I remember plenty of TV exposure for the film and for Dalton.
I just think Bond was in need of a real good shake up, and maybe the 6 year break, followed by a more high tech Bond and a popular actor in the US, was what the series needed.
Of course Dalton can't be fully blamed for the downward trend of the series, it was already heading that way with the later Moores, but he didn't exactly halt the slump and whether we like it or not Pierce Brosnan did do just that.
I think EON backed Dalton as much as they should/could have. TLD did have a reasonable budget and marketing. LTK not so much admittedly but then any movie would have been lost in 1989 against the massive stuff coming out that yr (the Bat, Indie etc.).
I disagree on the quality of output statement though. I believe the quality of output was there. LTK & TLD are two of the franchise's best, if not necessarily the most commercially appealing.
Whether we like it or not though, I'd safely say that Dalton's sex appeal is probably the least successful among women of all the Bond's, and that did have an impact (although difficult to quantify) on the financial success of his Bond films.
You don't like Dalton as Bond?
:D
She apparently had a thing for the dark, brooding type... since she also had the hots for Oliver Reed (of the 1960s-70s, before he bloated up with booze).
Well, same here. Maybe it says something about the type of women I socialize with then :)
In any case, as a male viewer I found Dalts actually pulled me into the film & the character far more than any of the other Bonds, he made me both believe and emotionally invest in the persona - something only he and DC have done so far...
THAT is what I want from the actor who plays 007.
In terms of the masses, there may sadly be some truth to this. They had to change the name to accommodate some fools who did not understand what it meant during focus groups after all.
If Craig's tenure as Bond has not been a success then I'd like buckets full of failure please. How many Billion dollars does the franchise need to take in before you'll acknowledge that Craig has been successful?
And this is regardless of personal appreciation of Craig's tenure. It is a success both critically and financially. Heck financially it's a triumph.
I am not saying success or indeed quality (as I think you are implying), is only defined by financial gain. That said I do not share at all your pessimism. But regardless of one's opinion towards the quality of the Craig tenure, one has to say that it is successful both popularly and critically. Whether or not it will sustain the test of time, whether or not it is harmful to the novels (and I don't think any movie, good or bad, can be) is an entirely different debate.
I don't think TSWLM deserves the popularity it had and still has. Yet it is a successful Bond movie. The Craig era so far has been far more popular both with the public and critics than the Dalton era was at its time. Hence my original question.
Just a second, let me check...no, the novels are just fine. Mine are right where I left them and I'll bet yours are too. The Fleming James Bond novels are still available in new editions in bookstores and online booksellers all over the world. Your fear for the continued existence of the novels is pretty much groundless. Sorry to be the bearer of good tidings.
If your only definition of "success" is whether or not YOU PERSONALLY are enjoying the current spate of movies, then that's a pretty limited definition. My definition of success is the amount of new viewers, and therefore potential new Bond fans, brought in by the current movies...and there again, by any logical definition of the term, the movies are successful. I'm sorry you aren't enjoying the current batch...but as long as they continue to make money, Eon will continue to make more Bond movies. Eventually they may even make something that meets your standards. If they were to STOP making Bond movies, then the likelihood of that happening would effectively reach Zero. I prefer the odds the way things are now, thank you very much.
A classic post.
He didn't ..mentioned critically success as well.
And beside, if one considers a movie overrated... It is still a critical success, whether one likes it or not. I find Forrest Gump utterly and completely overrated and undeserving of its critical praise and its popularity. But it was a success, no doubt.
Thanks, but Pshaw. T'aint nuthin. Some posts write themselves...
I recall most of the reviews in the US were mixed.
The post was a success regardless. Critically, if not financially.
Of CR? Of SF? You must be joking! QOS had mixed reviews (unfairly IMO), but nobody blamed Craig's acting for the movie. Critics were far more indulgent regarding his second movie than they ever were to Dalton at the time of LTK's release.
1. CR
2. DN
3. LALD
4. OHMSS (one one)
5. GE
6. TLD
Point is, DC had a much better film in CR than Dalton did in TLD. But then there's another issue: Craig was just a much better actor in his debut than Dalton.