It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I'm not sure I get your meaning?
Aside from that, people are also more aware of the ways advertising and marketing works and we see the media showing the Skyfall train even though most people around the world probably won't get the chance to visit it.
Sorry, but this is nonsense. You judge a movie on the finished product. Deleted scenes, creative differences, technical hitches, restrictive production periods are all utterly irrelevant. I certainly wouldn't go down that route if you want to defend QoS.
Quantum of Bourne is in my judgement a failed opportunity in the franchise, but the result of a director who is not at ease in the genre. But the director bears the responsibility for the end product........ his other movies are more statisfying.
Same here.
Great minds and all that ;)
Definitely the Bond film I've enjoyed most in the cinema since the Dalton era.
Plus Daniel Craig is amazing in this film and had the best clothes of the era.
The contrast between the frenetic action sequences and the quieter moments is deliberate. (Not that I want my actuon this way all the time)
The general reception trumps what some of us fans deeply enjoyed about it. I doubt we'll ever see a QoS 2.0 type film in the series again, as much of a disappointment as that is.
It's too late for one anyway.
James Bond stabbing guys in the throat and gunning Alfa Romeos off the side of the road. Can't go wrong there.
Totally agree. QOS really reminded me of very early Bond in many ways, before the bloat set in. It's more stripped back and energised than anything EON had made for years.
I understand all the criticisms and it could have been fine tuned had they had time. But overall I rate it quite highly. Probably the Craig film I'm most likely to rewatch.
The fact that on some days, they'd actually be writing the scene before they shot it is impressive, too - the film should've been a complete, tonal train wreck (between that and the writer's strike), but turned out gold, in my opinion.
QoB is still disappointing when it starts there is one masterclass of fucked up editing it is difficult to follow what the director wanted to begin with. The foot-chase in Italy is almost a light copy of the Bourne one in Morocco. One of the strangest things is the stunt coordinator and editor of the last Bourne movie and how they were deployed for this movie. They did not improve the movie
It is really crap the editing it is the major fault of the movie, it feels like the director did not have the right stuff filmed to make a logical action-scene and tries to hide it.
+1