It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Oh knight nice one Brady!
I know, write right?
It's nice to see you lot make spelling mistakes two to 2 too sometimes.
I've always considered Klebb the main villain.
Definitely one of the best henchman in the series, but for my money not the main villain of FRWL. Klebb/Blofeld would probably be...
And regarding the idea of including Klebb in the Henchman game... Well, i expect the same outcome. People will start whining that she "is not really a henchwoman", and she will be eliminated prematurely. I think it's unnecessary that both of FRWL's representatives should suffer because members are being nitpicky about semantics.
But now it seems like I'm making a big deal of this, and the truth is... I am! ;) These are, after all, minor concerns in my world. And that's why I found the reaction to Grant surprising in the first place...
Grant is a henchmen, and yes an iconicFleming created character, and the prototype for all the Eon Aryan henchmen that have followed, but still he's a henchman, who would fare well in any henchman game.
I can understand Sanchez scoring so high, because he was a charming engaging fellow, unless of course he was ordering your heart to be ripped out, whereas Goldfinger was a flat humourless sort.
Sanchez really liked Bond. He seemed to value him as a worthy team member. It was almost sad to see their bromance shattered, but still in the pantheon of Bond master villains, I find GF far more, lets say engaging.
He was a classic Fleming-created OTT supervillain. Unlike Sanchez he had no human qualities that I could discern such as loyalty or even a shred of warmth.
Bond seemed to treat GF with contempt, as if he was subhuman.
GF was all about megalomaniacal greed and power. This IMO is classic Bond turf - having to face these monster type villains, foil their mad schemes and vanquish them from the face of the earth, whilst doing so with grim determination and deadly force....tempered by the Bond style and charm.
This I think is the magic of the 007 world. It's fantasy. It's escapist, but grounded enough in reality, to allow us to suspend disbelief, if only for a couple of hours.
GF, Ernst and DN IMO are the big three of Bond villainy. And Eon to its credit has created many others, from the Fleming created mold.
I much liked how Eon, in the early days would continually re-invent Blofeld with different actors. The technique allowed for both continuity with iconic supervillainy but also also allowed for change and different looks for the same devil.
We may have seen more of this if McClory hadn't been such a pain-in-the-ass, and thwarted yet another Blofeld reinvention for TSWLM film.