It was the best of times; it was the worst of times... Moore vs, Brosnan

chrisisall

Moore had charm, and leftover credit from The Saint. He was good looking, and had real star power.
Brosnan was young & even better looking (& great hair), with leftover credit from Remington Steele.

IMO Pierce did a better Bond, more human, more apt to be volatile or emotional. More ready to kill in a moment.
Roger did a more personalised Bond, realising the finer qualities of the character in favour of the less redeeming.

Which of the two do you prefer, and why?

Creasy47

We already have a thread for this:

http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/1218/moore-vs.-brosnan/p1

chrisisall

OOops, my bad. Close please.

Benny

Another thread opened without using the search function first.
Really @chrisisall I'd expect better.

[-X

The things I do for England.