It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
That's how it looks in the airport scene. Like she's wearing boots and a trench. She looks like a stripogram. The skirt, if she has one, is invisible.
I wondered the same thing. And I rather liked the retro look and the amount of legs shown.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1053046/Agent-Fields-going-undiecover--Bond-girl-Gemma-gets-caught-wind-set-Panama.html
She is not wearing anything under the coat. It's absurd. I mean, it just looks ridiculous. What kind of 'secretary' or field agent or whatever she is supposed to be dresses like this for work? No one dresses like this for work, apart from a stripper.
The title of the photo in the Daily Mail is even 'Stripped for action'.
She's supposed to be playing some up-tight administrator, but the outward appearance is more 'fancy a sh*g Mr Bond?'
I don't think, that the writers had intended her to be an administrator at all. I can't claim any real knowledge ,but to me it's obvious, that she was meant to be an MI6 operator as well. I think as an explanation she would have told Bond, that she just came right out of another operation which had led to her present way of dressing. This would have led to some banter along the
"I just barely made it to escape"
" I see,what you mean with barely"
"Alll the things we do for the firm."
"Well, I might have something else for you to do..." persuasion and we would have seen them again hours later naked in the bedroom, which would make much more sense than this "stationary " abomination we got. But again,let me emphasize,that this is merely a theory of mine.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-1053046/Agent-Fields-going-undiecover--Bond-girl-Gemma-gets-caught-wind-set-Panama.html#ixzz30IMkJVaS
It's one of the weirdest moments in the film. Perhaps the entire series. The film makers must surely have had some reason - perhaps it got lost on Forster's extrremely messy cutting floor, along with a lot of other stuff that might have explained what was going on.
Yeah, the line about the stationery was awful. And people claim it was Brosnan that got the bad scripts...
That is a picture of the actress, off filming, out of character. Who knows if Fields had a miniskirt or merely undies? She probably just liked the look, that is all. She is supposed to be a glorified secretary in a small station in a remote country. She can wear whatever she wants.
That I doubt very much. Have you ever been to an embassy? At these kind of places no one look like he can wear (or behave like ) whatever he (or she) wants. I rather stick with my explanation.
Still a bit odd though isn't it?
I have been to High Commissions and I know there's a dress code, but I haven't been in the places civilians are not allowed to go. And beside, she could have not been on duty when she was summoned to meet Bond.
This is when dramatic license takes its toll on realism. It is a bit odd, but not overly so. Less odd in Bolivia than, say Iran. I always took it as a look influenced by old serials.
I think it's a photo of her in character on-set as well. Possibly her approaching the airport main entrance.
I suspect the director had a pretty strong voice in this costuming decision. Not the first stone I'd choose to cast in Marc Forster's direction, there are plenty more...
Until there is evidence of clothing, I do believe she was starkers under that trench. I believe the filmmakers were trying to titillate us with her prancing about.
In one of the still shots, posted on this site ( the old site) in the lead-up to the film, there was visual evidence of what I think, IIRC, was a pink bra-strap. No physical evidence of anything below that though. Not that I am aware of.
Yes, she did seem like a walking talking stripogram. :-*
I am referring to pulp fiction. The jacket being like one of those old Noir trench coats, sexed up if you will. I rather like it.
I see where you're coming from. Just seems totally out of context.
Jeremy Renner as Hansel. Awesome!