It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Roger Moore: 55 (+1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Look, I think some people need to accept that Connery is not everybody's Bond. For me, and lots of other people, Moore will always be the best incarnation of James Bond. Just as Lazenby is somebody's Bond, just as Brosnan is. Come on Sir Roger!
Roger Moore: 54 (-1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
This is embarrassing.
Roger Moore: 55 (+1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Roger Moore: 54 -1
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Friday
Sean Connery: 45 (-1)
Roger Moore: 55 (+1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Sean Connery: 46 (+1)
Roger Moore: 54 (-1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Sean Connery: 45 (-1)
Roger Moore: 55 (+1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Roger Moore: 54 (-1)
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
Roger Moore: 53 (-1)
Sean Connery: 48 (+1)
Roger Moore: 52 (-1)
And seriously, where in the blue hell did all these Moore fans come from?
We struck a deal with @Mooredock. That is my vote up there, by the way.
Oh you. =))
Of course it is "having it in for someone". When one of the candidates leading margin is at roughly 30 points, of course it's not fair to erase that entire lead. And how thus equaling the points make things "move along"? Moore is basically as far away from being eliminated as he was before. If this has any effect it will to lengthen this game's duration, not shorten it.
I guess you have every right to do as you did, this being your thread. But that doesn't make it fair. It doesn't exactly work in your favour either that you have consistently been voting for Moore after Brosnan was aliminated. And although I don't care too much about the outcome of this game, I find your argumentation here quite ridiculous...
The ventriloquist Mooreduck (very best Duck) gives his puppet the @thunderfinger for being nasty and pooping in his hand. In his own thread.
This the stupidest most childish post I think that I have ever read on the web anywhere.
@murdock brazenly strips more than 30 points off the candidate that he brazenly doesn't support, conveniently ignoring the fact that he is openly biased against said candidate, nevermind that the idea of stripping 30 points off one name and none from the other is idiotic in the first place.
The game is done. its now been rigged by the simpleton in charge. @murdock doesn't have the organizational skills to run a two-car parade.
Sorry for being so insulting but @murdock has wasted all of our time on this game. The results are now meaningless, not to mention entirely arbitrary.
I would suggest that mods run games in future. Not unqualified members. We can all at least defer to a mod's authority as mod....
Any idea would have been a better idea.
But here's some ideas that have worked in the past, maybe before your time.
Take 50% totals off each name and/or increase the increment to +/- 5 points.
If one has a grasp of, I think Grade 8 math, you will realize both methods are perfectly fair, and respectful of votes that have come before. Its not that tough to figure out.
But again we need mods running these games, not some guy who takes his orders from his monkey puppet.
When Connery had 1,5 (roughly) of Moores score, of course it is a huge change...
There have been several ideas being suggested and discussed. (Personally I'm fan of the "equal cut" idea we have used before.) None of them are Perfect of course, but this has to rank as the worst for two reasons: 1) It's the least fair idea. And (more importantly) 2) It doesn't even speed things. On the contrary it slows Things down.
The only ones who get an advantage out of this are those who want Moore to win, no matter how long it takes. The least thing you could have done was to take it up for discussion before deciding...
Sean Connery: 83
Roger Moore: 55
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby
In that spirit I will take up your offer to continue where we left off before the big meltdown, but I do think that only a MOD should be making any future decisions regarding how this game is ultimately resolved. That's why they get the big bucks.
Friday vote
Sean Connery: 84 +1
Roger Moore: 54 -1
Eliminated:
3) Daniel Craig
4) Timothy Dalton
5) Pierce Brosnan
6) George Lazenby