It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Same here. His "vision" of Bond seemed to be a catalogue of clichés about British people. I am so glad his dreadful Batman script never made it into a movie.
I'm so glad they scrapped his supposedly "best quip" :O in TSWLM too. That would have been cringeworthy! So tasteless, and not even funny.
I know, it adds fuel to my theory that in the decadent era of the 1970s the Bond films descended into little more than sex comedies in those scripts provided by Tom Mankiewicz and Christopher Wood (himself of Confessions... fame). I have more to say on all of this subject area of the Bond films of the 1970s in more depth on my blog at some point.
This would have made for a fun exchange. It does sound very similar to the tone of some of their actual tetes a tetes, but I do think it is helped by the connection with FRWL. I like the connection between the two films.
=====
Do you have a favourite one liner?
The Best Bond quip maybe that I ever wrote – and I wrote hundreds of them – was cut out of The Spy Who Loved Me. It’s when Roger meets Barbara Bach at the bar. He knows that she’s a Soviet Major or something and she knows he’s 007. Anyway, he says, “I must say, you’re prettier than your pictures, Major,” and she responds, “The only picture I’ve seen of you, Mr. Bond, was taken in bed with one of our agents – a Miss Tatiana Romanova.” (She’s the girl in From Russia with Love.) Roger then said, “Was she smiling?” And Barbara Bach answers, “As I recall, her mouth was not immediately visible.” Roger retorts, “Then I was smiling.”
Edit: very informative discussion with Wood as well.
Being a huge fan of the Remo Williams Destroyer novels, Wood confirmed what I have suspected; that there was no second Remo movie as the first was a boxoffice flop.
I liked it obviously, as it turned me on to reading all of the published books, which are way better than the film.
But I also thought the film title was one of the worst ever, "Remo Williams: The Adventure Begins." That title is uber lame, considering all the great Bond-like book titles they could have chosen. And its also pretentious, with the title seemingly presuming a sequel.
Remo film rights, or more properly, The Destroyer film rights, have been back in play for a while. Someone though is sitting on actually making a new movie.
But if and when another Destroyer film is made, please do work with the Destroyer title, not the Remo name. Remo is an assassin of the highest order. He's not only witty and glib, but also dark and dangerous when need be. The Destroyer moniker fits the character perfectly.
==also liked Woods reflections on Moonraker. He made it clear, he wanted a harder edged film, that he hated Dolly ( don't blame him he says) and a great line that Jaws had totally sacrificed credibility as a figure of menace. Not his fault though.
His two screenplay adaptations I think are as good as they are, because he did consciously try to imitate Fleming's style.
And it would have been a vulgar joke on the greatest Bond movie.
Wood wrote two excellent novels that I would not have minded on the big screen, but what we ended up with was excellent enough.
And I do agree with the remark about the ski stunt from TSWLM it is a far better stunt than QoS or SF has delivered without CGI, the difference being that the stuntman of TSWLM indeed did something very daring and as a viewer I know it.
I found TSWLM a superiour version of YOLT in that case, YOLT was imho a crime against Flemings novel.
In that regard, yes. At least TSWLM was not mean to be an adaptation of the novel.
And TSWLM showed Roger Moore at his best as 007 while YOLT did show a sometimes less than enthusiastic Sean at work.
http://www.empireonline.com/interviews/interview.asp?IID=1109
I can imagine that you were as it is far superior to the film version.
And I kept imagining Sean Connery in it. What surprised me is that, although the setting and plot is ludicrous, Bond is very close to Fleming's Bond. And Wood goes through great efforts to make Stromberg a Flemingesque villain.
Oh no, Fleming's novel is the best. And very underrated.
It's certainly his most autographical work too, along with 'Octopussy' but the novel and film versions off TSWLM cannot really be compared for obvious enough reasons.
I really love Flemings' TSWLM as it read more like one of those noir detectives, I found it a valid exercise by Fleming to show James Bond in a different light. And he did that very well imo.