It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
The imdbpage of Bond 24 http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2379713/
Eh ? Craig has the normal 3 films + 1 optional film... so it was possible he could have turned down his optional 4th film, even if very unlikely. As for post Bond 24 films, Craig hasn't signed for them yet.
Probably / possibly Craigs fourth. Has the news hit DanielCraigIsNotBond yet?
I must say I'm not a fan of the lengthy hiatus we've had between films. This will be a welcome return to the Bond series of old.
http://debrief.commanderbond.net/topic/61416-bond-24-confirmed-for-2014/page__st__60
Old news, and if you hear/read the interview (collider I believe) they just say they do a film at a time, sony got excited, etc
I really miss them naming the next film following the end credits. I'm just nostalgic.
That being said, I just hope they can put out a quality product. It was four years between DAD and CR and that turned out pretty good. However, only two years between CR and QoS and most of Brosnan's films and we all see how that worked out.
I guess filmmaking for large studios is more complex these days than back in the 60's, 70's and 80's.
Ya never know if Logan, Wade, Pervis, the producers and Mandes(?!) find I title they love then we could have it! Also if they have decided to do it round a title like a villan called Risco...
I am hoping Mendes does return, during the presser before production, he never answered if he would return or not..... but its obvious that EON will extend the offer, they did it with both Campbell and Forster, both turned them down.... I do have a good feeling about this Mendes/Craig combination, and I think if SF turns out to be critical success, then I could see Mendes returning..... not many directors would've sat around and waited like he did when MGM was trying to figure their finances out - even turning down other directing offers due to his involvement with his stage production, but also the new Bond picture...
I would also like to see one of the remaining Fleming titles to be used...
that is all..
Don't know, just a thought I had the other day that I thought would be cool...
As much as I agree that Nolan would be a phenomenal choice to do a Bond, I don't think it's very likely that it would happen. If for no better reason because he is too big at this point. He is an auteur, and EON has always strayed away from that. Not to mention that he would be very expensive to bring on. The only way I see that happening is if Nolan agreed to take a massive pay cut and also work within the paramaters of what EON dictates. And for him to do that he would have to be a massive fan. I believe he is from what I've heard him say, but his career is clearly carrying superb momentum right now so he would really need to consider all of this very carefully.
That said, I've always thought that Danny Boyle would be an inspired choice. He's British, edgy, highly-respected and award-friendly, but not as commercial as Nolan.
I also miss knowing what the next title will be, but that was easier said than done when they still had original Fleming titles and material to work with.
I still insist QOS was a good, not great sequel to CR and yet gets hung out to dry with the worst Bond films without consideration to issues beyond it's control, yet still managed to answer the questions coming out of CR. It's a middle of the pack type to be that could have been a top 10 with a few more scenes. DAD had an extra year and no issues and failed miserably in comparison.