It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I wish I was so lucky. It was sort of a big plot point, and I've been avoiding the big spoilers and I've only allowed myself to look at little ones, like the characters names, the locations, and some action scenes.
I have watch it like 10 times and still look it every time!
Wow. You'll have to tell me what it was come November.
Just remember one thing - there was NO way to continue in the same vain as the Brosnan films, as people were starting to get rather tired of all the over the top stuff. So - they toned it down and people liked that. Now, after two films, they want another change and they will do that to the best of their abilities, namely not loosing the bits of reality and modern approach and still adding some of the old film assets. Not easy - but to be fair - they did, what they thought, the public wanted and I suppose, they continue to do that now.
Thank you. That's what some people - not saying anyone on here, just people posting on other news sites - don't understand: it's a TEASER trailer, which sets out to tease. I don't see how people can make complete judgments on an 84-second teaser trailer, of all things. Wait until October/November, see the film, then decide. Only then, can you truly know how the movie is.
I, too, was not as fortunate as you. @thelivingroyale and I both caught it before it was fixed, sadly. Really altered my mood.
I don't know if this will make you feel a bit better but the spoiler was not entirely correct, in fact it had one Huge mistake! So, consider yourselves a little bit unspoiled!
Yeah same here.
You're welcome guys. Prepare to be surprised.
Just looked through the YT ones and considering its YT and half is unreadable it wasn't all that bad. A mixed bag, as expected, really.
That's why I couldn't see them; they blend right into the background!! Thank you for the pic!
That image looks like it has been photoshopped and the characters stuck in, but obviously hasn't.
I loved the very refined and rich, almost saturated, look of some of the shots, beginning with the logo of MGM and continuing with the casino and the neon shots. Promising!
They all had one at one point ;)
I mentioned that the spoiler was a little wrong on the previous page but didn't want to precede the spoiler tag with anything, as letting those concerned know there was something off, may have been a spoiler in itself. They'll now go into the film expecting something different.
It's a lose-lose situation, really @Sandy. Those tags are so very important.
Agreed. The media world and many posters on Bond sites had to eat their words after CR
The screenshot HAS BEEN Photoshoped. I'm the one who did it, only to highlight them in the pic.
xxx