It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Hehe! Okay, I'll set up XXXXXnotBond.com now and we can start campaigning that the next guy is terrible now :D
PS: Did you know Flemming didn't like the idea of Connery until he met him?
I suspect it will be 2024.
I hope I'm wrong but I think it's going to be a few years and I'm nervous radical changes are over the hill
Yep :(
Now we now they’re all about being radical and making changes. So anything goes...
But the are also savvy enough to change course, FYEO and CR being the most notable. I don’t think they’ll go back to the Moore or Brosnan excesses but I do think they will go for a somewhat lighter, escapist tone.
I think that's very possible, yeah you're right- it's where the past few films have gradually lead in some part. I can't really second guess where they'll go, I don't think any of us can.
I would love to see a balanced direction, but without going so deeply into the personal drama.
Can i get a thumbs up for the possibility of Tom Hiddleston as the next Bond.
His portrayal in The Night Manager should at least get him an audition....
Problem is he's 40, could have been good for this current movie, so next movie 3 years minimum away, so 42 when he starts filming, what I'm saying is he's too old already, Connery was 32 and Craig 38 when their 1st Bond came out, if you want some continuity then the new actor needs to be well under 40, which makes me think of what my Father used to say, " You know your getting old when Bond is younger than you are".
PS: Sorry copied didn't spot first line.
Yes it's my fault for coming onto a Bond site, but it's not exactly hard to not drop spoilers is it? One of this lot even went in the 'NO SPOILERS' reactions thread to drop a load of spoilers as if it was hard to read the title, but it seems retroactively changing the name of the thread is how we're doing it.
Why do there need to be spoilers in this thread, mods? Is there a regeneration sequence into the next Bond or something?
What spoiler? Daniel Craigs demise (end) as his tenure of Bond has occurred.
Thats a perfectly acceptable statement isnt it?
And MTM, are you telling me that even though youve been a member since 2011 (10 years) that youve not seen or heard ANY SPOILERS AT ALL? Methinks he doth protest too much M'Lud.
An apology would be acceptable here from a long standing member to a noob who hasnt given ANYTHING away and asked what he believed was an innocuous question.
Thank you.
Don't be a dick.
Absolutely no one owes you an apology and you know PRECISELY what you did. That's all I'll add to this.
PS: For those who haven't served over & out means over to you but shut up.
Aww but the film only reaches Cuba and introduces Paloma in the 45th minute and she's around until the 57th minute mark and I've had said that whole sequence was pretty decent. Maybe you liked the first hour?
No, please, do elaborate how someone having a movie they waited six years for spoiled randomly in a thread that has little to do with said movie makes them a "precious dick." Because you saying that makes YOU, if anyone, look like the "precious dick," particularly in the way you repeatedly hold your service above everyone else's head as if it gives you a monopoly on being upset. I really hate that I might be the person to break this to you but the fact that you served in and of itself doesn't actually make you a better or more deserving person nor does it give you a monopoly on emotions.
Oh yes, thank you, I needed a more correct time stamp. First hour it is, then :)
All of which is not required in a thread about the casting of James Bond #7
There are still plenty of us who have yet to see No Time To Die and shouldn’t have to read spoilers or plot details in a safe thread like this.
Has the thread title has been changed by a mod to allow spoilers or is that just to warn folks of what’s already in here?
Seems as though MTM whoever that is seems to run this place, virtue signalling the innocent newbies and putting them in their place. I came here for the first time, posted my opinion and got slagged off for my efforts. I don't believe whatever his name was hadn't already seen the film or read any spoiler materials, he just wants to make himself the centre of attention. Well done him, he succeeded, now we all know he's a pretentious dick. Oh, and thank you for your support to a new member, much appreciated, but frankly I can do without MTM and his minions (not you) piling on in some schoolyard arguments so for me it's Over And Out and I'll leave the incidious rabble to argue who's got the biggest PPK.