It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Anyway, I prefer Moore overall.
More physical, (mostly) took the role seriously and just had more energy and style overall. Plus he was my first image of Bond.
I do enjoy Moore though.
I felt during the Brosnan era, mainly TWINE and DAD, that Bond was becoming self-parody. We see hints of it in TND too. Not his fault, mostly the producers, but stiill one reason why I enjoy Rog slightly more.
I'd say they were the most comedy driven out of the lot. ("YOU BIG BULLY")
Still, I agree that they are fun nonetheless.
I can agree that Moore had more style and so, but Brosnan is a icon for me....
i grew up with Brosnan, and my first Bond film was Goldeneye... BUT... with all that said, in the end, i think i would rather watch 4 of Moore's films than 4 of Brosnan's... Pierce started off in Goldeneye as almost a nice hybrid between Connery and Moore - he could be ruthless, but also smarmy... but as the films went on, he started becoming more and more like Moore - far more humor than actual physicality - and i would rather take the original, than someone turning into him..
Can we get a poll for this one too, please?
For me Sean Connery & Roger Moore are the two sides of the 007 coin. The rest of them can be compared to them but never as good.
Make that 20-5 as I will go with Moore.
Bartleby didn't clarify his choice so I haven't included him in the count. ;-)