Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1124812491251125312541260

Comments

  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    Posts: 867
    Youth is an asset, but if they're around 40 - 43 or so and look younger, then they'd still be fine. I'm 45, but I look 25 - 30. No, I'm not going to try out for Bond. I'm a skinny American who can't act. 😅
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,300
    Youth is an asset, but if they're around 40 - 43 or so and look younger, then they'd still be fine. I'm 45, but I look 25 - 30. No, I'm not going to try out for Bond. I'm a skinny American who can't act. 😅

    Nor could George Lazenby, so there's that.
    Chuck your hat in the ring with @DewiWynBond ;)
  • edited February 15 Posts: 1,056
    Royal rumble?

    Reminds me of someone trying a wrestling move on me in Jiu-jitsu years ago. A piledriver! I almost broke my neck.
  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    Posts: 867
    Benny wrote: »
    Youth is an asset, but if they're around 40 - 43 or so and look younger, then they'd still be fine. I'm 45, but I look 25 - 30. No, I'm not going to try out for Bond. I'm a skinny American who can't act. 😅

    Nor could George Lazenby, so there's that.
    Chuck your hat in the ring with @DewiWynBond ;)

    I'm of the opinion that Lazenby could act, at least judging by the results. Not as good as Connery, obviously. But judging him on his own, he did quite well.

    Anyway...
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,300
    Don’t get me wrong, I like George and I think much of the charm and success of Majesty’s is because of him.
    However, at the time he wasn’t quite in the same league as Connery or Moore.
  • Posts: 1,056
    Royal rumble?
    Benny wrote: »
    Don’t get me wrong, I like George and I think much of the charm and success of Majesty’s is because of him.
    However, at the time he wasn’t quite in the same league as Connery or Moore.

    You could say he had one mode of acting, but the ending was something natural. I'm planning a variety of acts myself.
  • Posts: 9,910
    After listening to writing in the wall this morning (me and my wife are doing sort of a year in review music wise each week ) to the Turner fans if you can convince me we wont have any sam smith in his tenure but good rock and roll like McCartney and Cornell then you have another fan of turner lol
  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    edited February 16 Posts: 867
    Risico007 wrote: »
    After listening to writing in the wall this morning (me and my wife are doing sort of a year in review music wise each week ) to the Turner fans if you can convince me we wont have any sam smith in his tenure but good rock and roll like McCartney and Cornell then you have another fan of turner lol

    No Sam Smith. But unlikely rock n' roll. I'd prefer tasteful, beautiful pop music. Jazzy standard would be better, but unrealistic, sad to say.

    gettyimages-2152627248-612x612-1.jpg

    Another reminder just how damn right he looks and feels for Bond.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,382
    A. Turner with an Oasis title track, I’m in.
  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    Posts: 867
    talos7 wrote: »
    A. Turner with an Oasis title track, I’m in.
    If EON was ever going to have Oasis do a Bond them, it would've been 30 years ago.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,683
    There's no question Aidan Turner is a natural fit, but time isn't on his side anymore, and B26 is not about to start filming tomorrow.

    From everything we know about EON, they want someone who can play Bond for at least a decade.

    I don't know why they are so hung up about it, they just are.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,382
    talos7 wrote: »
    A. Turner with an Oasis title track, I’m in.
    If EON was ever going to have Oasis do a Bond them, it would've been 30 years ago.

    They are about to launch a reunion that will include a tour and album; the tour quickly sold out ; It is a perfect time to have them do the title track.

    https://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/music/news/oasis-reunion-tour-tickets-sold-out-resale-b2604876.html
  • SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷SecretAgentMan⁰⁰⁷ Lekki, Lagos, Nigeria
    edited February 16 Posts: 2,295
    It seems the theme song now depends on the actor playing Bond and the film's direction. I read somewhere that Goldfrapp were to work on CR, but when EON wanted a grounded and raw Bond in Craig, Goldfrapp weren't suitable anymore. I still want to hear a Goldfrapp Bond theme, though. The duo were so made for Bond. A lot of their songs are really Bondian.

    I would also like to hear an Oasis Bond theme though, love the band. Like The Smiths, they're a guitar-driven rock band. They even have songs that would have suited Craig's portrayal of Bond in CR & QoS. So yeah, Noel on guitar, and Liam's nasal singing style, always sounds cool.
  • edited February 19 Posts: 483
    ScreenRant on why the next Bond actor should be over 40.

    https://screenrant.com/james-bond-26-next-007-actor-age-younger-mistake-op-ed/

    I suppose you could cast an older actor but given the big gaps between recent films, how many films could an older actor play? Probably not many. Three within a decade, I guess. That's assuming Bond 26 is made within the next five years. You need Bond 26 released by 2027 ish if you want to cast an older actor.

    I think there are pros and cons going older. But it could work, I guess.


  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    edited February 19 Posts: 17,192
    Yeah I don't think it's impossible. If they found someone they thought absolutely perfect then I don't think a few years in either direction will put them off. Craig was a bit old for what the plan with CR was but it didn't matter. I think that could also apply to someone in their 20s too: it's about what vibe they give off.

    Good picture of Pierce in the tank in that article; you don't see that one very often.
  • Posts: 4,674
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I don't think it's impossible. If they found someone they thought absolutely perfect then I don't think a few years in either direction will put them off. Craig was a bit old for what the plan with CR was but it didn't matter. I think that could also apply to someone in their 20s too: it's about what vibe they give off.

    Good picture of Pierce in the tank in that article; you don't see that one very often.

    I think their priority is getting the best actor, yes. There’s a wide age range there that’d work (at least 28-45, if not slightly younger or older potentially).
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,683
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I don't think it's impossible. If they found someone they thought absolutely perfect then I don't think a few years in either direction will put them off. Craig was a bit old for what the plan with CR was but it didn't matter. I think that could also apply to someone in their 20s too: it's about what vibe they give off.

    Good picture of Pierce in the tank in that article; you don't see that one very often.

    I think their priority is getting the best actor, yes. There’s a wide age range there that’d work (at least 28-45, if not slightly younger or older potentially).

    So the likes of Aidan Turner and Henry Cavill are still in the fold?
  • edited February 19 Posts: 4,674
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I don't think it's impossible. If they found someone they thought absolutely perfect then I don't think a few years in either direction will put them off. Craig was a bit old for what the plan with CR was but it didn't matter. I think that could also apply to someone in their 20s too: it's about what vibe they give off.

    Good picture of Pierce in the tank in that article; you don't see that one very often.

    I think their priority is getting the best actor, yes. There’s a wide age range there that’d work (at least 28-45, if not slightly younger or older potentially).

    So the likes of Aidan Turner and Henry Cavill are still in the fold?

    So personally speaking I’ve always said either actor’s age isn’t a big issue. Both look great and are more or less in their prime from what I can see. But I don’t personally think they’re interesting candidates nor do I think either will be the next Bond.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,300
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I don't think it's impossible. If they found someone they thought absolutely perfect then I don't think a few years in either direction will put them off. Craig was a bit old for what the plan with CR was but it didn't matter. I think that could also apply to someone in their 20s too: it's about what vibe they give off.

    Good picture of Pierce in the tank in that article; you don't see that one very often.

    I think their priority is getting the best actor, yes. There’s a wide age range there that’d work (at least 28-45, if not slightly younger or older potentially).

    So the likes of Aidan Turner and Henry Cavill are still in the fold?

    Don't get ahead of yourself as you usually do.
    The article is based on the opinion of the author, not the thoughts of EON.
  • George_KaplanGeorge_Kaplan Being chauffeured by Tibbett
    edited February 20 Posts: 708
    A bit late to the party here, and I hate to be negative, but I thought all four of the recently released audition tapes were terrible. Cavill was flat as a pancake, and his poker face became quite annoying, Friend looked and sounded like a little boy, Worthington (although I'm somewhat intrigued by the idea of a less refined, 'Jack the Lad' type of Bond) was clearly very uncomfortable, and it came through in his performance, and Starr was just incredibly bland. I honestly can’t see Bond in any of these men. Quite frankly, thank god for Craig!
  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    edited February 20 Posts: 867
    Benny wrote: »
    007HallY wrote: »
    mtm wrote: »
    Yeah I don't think it's impossible. If they found someone they thought absolutely perfect then I don't think a few years in either direction will put them off. Craig was a bit old for what the plan with CR was but it didn't matter. I think that could also apply to someone in their 20s too: it's about what vibe they give off.

    Good picture of Pierce in the tank in that article; you don't see that one very often.

    I think their priority is getting the best actor, yes. There’s a wide age range there that’d work (at least 28-45, if not slightly younger or older potentially).

    So the likes of Aidan Turner and Henry Cavill are still in the fold?

    Don't get ahead of yourself as you usually do.
    The article is based on the opinion of the author, not the thoughts of EON.

    Ahead of ourselves? Now why would we do a silly thing like that? Pfft.
    NAEPfg6.jpeg
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 17,192
    A bit late to the party here, and I hate to be negative, but I thought all four of the recently released audition tapes were terrible. Cavill was flat as a pancake, and his poker face became quite annoying, Friend looked and sounded like a little boy, Worthington (although I'm somewhat intrigued by the idea of a less refined, 'Jack the Lad' type of Bond) was clearly very uncomfortable, and it came through in his performance, and Starr was just incredibly bland. I honestly can’t see Bond in any of these men. Quite frankly, thank god for Craig!

    Regarding Cavill’s poker face, it’s worth noting that no movie scene like that would hold on Bond’s face for the entire thing and actors know that. Someone did actually cut his audition into the film scene on YT and it makes more sense like that, cutting away to Xenia on her lines.
  • Posts: 1,637
    Cavill was good enough in my opinion.

    If hiring him saves us years of waiting, go ahead.
  • Jordo007Jordo007 Merseyside
    Posts: 2,700
    I do wonder if the time between NTTD and Bond 26 will affect the direction of the film? By the time Bond 26 comes out Casino will probably be at least 20 years old (😬) so the idea of "rookie Bond" won't feel as familiar to the audience.

    Also the idea of a younger "rookie Bond" again might be a good draw for potential actors and the audience.

    Let's say everything behind the scenes had been running smoothly and they'd got a film out 2024/25, I think a TLD/GE soft reboot might have been more likely
  • edited February 20 Posts: 4,674
    Cavill was good enough in my opinion.

    If hiring him saves us years of waiting, go ahead.

    It won’t make a difference. In fact even if the wait had anything to do with the actor I reckon Cavill being cast would create scheduling problems in the long run (he’s pretty in demand as an actor and seems to be about to join Marvel). They can do better than ‘good enough’ 😉
    Jordo007 wrote: »
    I do wonder if the time between NTTD and Bond 26 will affect the direction of the film? By the time Bond 26 comes out Casino will probably be at least 20 years old (😬) so the idea of "rookie Bond" won't feel as familiar to the audience.

    Also the idea of a younger "rookie Bond" again might be a good draw for potential actors and the audience.

    Let's say everything behind the scenes had been running smoothly and they'd got a film out 2024/25, I think a TLD/GE soft reboot might have been more likely

    It’ll be interesting to see. My theory is they might be hesitant to do a rookie/younger Bond thing (I wouldn’t count CR as even that gave us an established Bond, albeit on an early mission). I think Bond’s appeal is that he’s a hardened professional to some extent. Take too much of that away and he’s not quite the same. But I suspect it can be done.
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,300
    I’m all for an Aidan Turner trilogy.

    Great age, fine actor. Get the ball rolling, sign him up for three and let’s do this.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,683
    Benny wrote: »
    I’m all for an Aidan Turner trilogy.

    Great age, fine actor. Get the ball rolling, sign him up for three and let’s do this.

    I think in order for there to be a chance of that happening EON would need to go down the "grab Campbell and thrash out a script and get to work" kind of approach of keeping a very tight control over every aspect.

    If EON want prestige talent behind the camera, then I don't know what the appeal of an Aidan Turner would be. He's only ever really had a role as a side character in a Peter Jackson trilogy. Really not trying to be mean, but If you look at the films of Christopher Nolan or Denis Villeneuve or any other type of Prestige director, they almost always are stacked with A-listers.
  • edited February 20 Posts: 4,674
    I always forget Turner was in The Hobbit. It’s crazy how little impact he made in that film for me.

    It’s my biggest problem with Turner - for whatever reason he just doesn’t have the charisma or presence for a big film. I guess he’s fine on tv/smaller scale stuff. But even then I don’t quite see the appeal. Happy to be wrong though.
  • ThunderballThunderball playing Chemin de Fer in a casino, downing Vespers
    edited February 20 Posts: 867
    Benny wrote: »
    I’m all for an Aidan Turner trilogy.

    Great age, fine actor. Get the ball rolling, sign him up for three and let’s do this.

    I think in order for there to be a chance of that happening EON would need to go down the "grab Campbell and thrash out a script and get to work" kind of approach of keeping a very tight control over every aspect.

    If EON want prestige talent behind the camera, then I don't know what the appeal of an Aidan Turner would be. He's only ever really had a role as a side character in a Peter Jackson trilogy. Really not trying to be mean, but If you look at the films of Christopher Nolan or Denis Villeneuve or any other type of Prestige director, they almost always are stacked with A-listers.

    I don't care about "A-listers" and "prestige". What works for a Nolan or Villeneuve film, might not be right for Bond. I mean, Connery was in nothing of much great value before becoming Bond. He worked with prestige directs after.

    And everyone completely ignored my Aidan Turner Teaser poster I just posted above. 😅 (it's fine, it was hidden by spoiler tags for effect)
    Let's try this again, along with the Risico poster I did a couple years ago:

    NAEPfg6.jpeg
    avFB4oV.jpeg
  • edited February 20 Posts: 1,637
    Richard Armitage was the man in The Hobbit but he's too old now.

    In any case I don't think we need another Dalton, a fan favorite but with little appeal to the masses.
Sign In or Register to comment.