It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I think EON realized that they were too CUCKOO to make Bond and Blofeld brothers. I also have written down ideas for a Blofeld spinoff story, @Ludovico it's tough. I think at best, I'm aiming for a short story, honestly.
As for the new book itself, could the press release that week be made because that week would have been Peter Hunt’s 100th birthday? The timing while not on his actual birthday does seem to be more than coincidence. Maybe a Blofeld book series is in the works.
Pleasance is suitably creepy and iconic, I dare say he's even a little underrated nowadays.
Savalas is probably objectively the best of the on-screen Blofelds.
Charles Gray is underrated and fits the film he's in like a glove.
Christoph Waltz's portrayal was abysmal.
Great viewpoints. I still think the best way to bring Blofeld back is reintroducing Irma Bunt.
But the Blofeld at the desert location. The one that says to go ahead and touch the meteor. It strikes a different tone and is not written as well as the first part. Then at the end we get back to a little more of the creepy Blofeld. So the script does him no favours.
In SP, Waltz is just kind of diminutive and doesn't "take up space" with any charisma or sense of threat or menace. He's just doing a rather poor imitation of his earlier, better performance.
In SP he just doesn't have anything to work with. He's barely in the movie to begin with- pretty much only three scenes- the SPECTRE meeting, the SPECTRE base, and finale in London. And not only is he not in the movie enough, he's not given anything to do in the scenes that he does have. He's a stock character with a stock motivation and stock lines.
Bardem did well playing Silva, a similar villain who's only in a few scenes, because he's tall and has a deep voice. He makes an impression and can do a lot with a little. Waltz can also do a lot, but only if he's given a lot. If they wanted him for Blofeld, they would've been better off going the OHMSS/DAF route by giving him plenty of scenes and a lot of dialogue.
This is a good point. Waltz is a verbose actor and the script didn't give him much.
I know people like the Spectre meeting scene and I've never understood why. It's well shot. But it's long and boring and Blofeld is not commenting on anything regarding his criminal enterprise. Compare the TB scene, which is so, so much better-written.
Even if they had copied Silva in SF and given Blofeld a long speech at some point (in the crater?), that would have been better than what we got.
100%, great writing, perfectly excecuted