Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1127212731274127512761278»

Comments

  • edited 4:10pm Posts: 5,068
    007HallY wrote: »
    My sense of Reacher is he’s rather idealised. Maybe I haven’t seen enough of the character though, but generally from what I’ve seen he’s always a few steps ahead of everyone else and even if he has his own moral code/is a loner, he’s very much a chivalrous figure who’ll help out or resolve a situation for selfless reasons.

    For some reason, this description of Reacher's appearance in one of the books makes me cringe a little bit:

    "a six-pack like a cobbled city street, a chest like a suit of NFL armor, biceps like basketballs, and subcutaneous fat like a Kleenex tissue."

    It's very... idealised, as you say.

    That's quite a description! :)) It's not quite Ian Fleming or Raymond Chandler, is it? I've never read the books but the film and I suppose the TV series gave me the impression of him being idealised.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,492
    Until he met his wife, William Munny was probably one of the most vicious, reprehensible characters Eastwood ever portrayed; he somewhat blurred the line between hero and anti hero.
  • Posts: 15,537
    talos7 wrote: »
    Until he met his wife, William Munny was probably one of the most vicious, reprehensible characters Eastwood ever portrayed; he somewhat blurred the line between hero and anti hero.

    I think the hero/antihero debate deserves its own thread.

    On a side note, the most typical modern antihero imo would be Peter Venkman. Maybe not the other Ghostbusters, but him definitely. He's little more than a crook.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,492
    Ludovico wrote: »
    talos7 wrote: »
    Until he met his wife, William Munny was probably one of the most vicious, reprehensible characters Eastwood ever portrayed; he somewhat blurred the line between hero and anti hero.

    I think the hero/antihero debate deserves its own thread.

    On a side note, the most typical modern antihero imo would be Peter Venkman. Maybe not the other Ghostbusters, but him definitely. He's little more than a crook.

    I agree, it’s a very interesting topic, and open to a great deal of discussion
Sign In or Register to comment.