How the hell was Newman nominated for an oscar but not Barry?

Aziz_FekkeshAziz_Fekkesh Royale-les-Eaux
edited January 2013 in Music Posts: 403
This is patently absurd and just goes to show how much of a joke the oscars are. Barry does incredible scores throughout the series but only gets nominated for his work outside of the series, as if Bond isn't good enough. Suddenly, Newman gets nominated on a critically acclaimed film (because that's the only reason they pay attention; also because it's a popularity contest) for a score that is unremarkable and not even close to Barry's scores. Same goes for Ken Adam. The only reason I'd watch this bollocks is if all the Bond's reunite, and even then not all the way through, I can't stand it.
«1

Comments

  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    The Oscars feel that if they let a series like Bond win awards like composer/director/actor/Best Picture (basically the ones that get the most attention) then they will have lowered themselves and then people would ask them to include films like it (other films with action in it as a feature) and other films in that regard as being "Oscar worthy". I don't think Skyfall is all over the place with action, but the Academy doesn't go for that kind of stuff. Though, previous films have won big that feature massive battles/fights: Think Braveheart and Saving Private Ryan for instance, so that doesn't make much sense. I don't get why the Academy has a disdain for the series, but if they are doing it to try and protect some integrity, they already lost any they would have had anyway decades ago.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 2,171
    for a score that is unremarkable and not even close to Barry's scores.

    As Le Chiffre would say...

    "BUT YOU ARE SO... WRONG!!!"

    Newman's Skyfall score is great. Sure, its not what is considered a "traditional" Bond score (see Barry) or a 007-theme dependent score (see earlier Arnold) but that doesnt mean its unremarkable. It's remarkable in its own right.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited January 2013 Posts: 24,256
    To be honest, I agree with the frustration for it's been one of mine for ages.

    John Barry composed such musical masterpieces for the Bonds, it is quite frankly hallucinating to conclude that in his lifetime he never received an Oscar for them. I say them because even one wouldn't have been enough. Either he wasn't nominated or he was but lost the Oscar to an inferior score. Am I pursuing illegitimate truth in what is at best my opinion? Perhaps. But let's be frank - one can almost objectively speaking recognise Barry's Bond music as ahead of its time, nearly perfect, universally influential for many celebrated composers that came after him, and so on.

    It's not a shame that other composers were nominated for, or took home, an Oscar for their Bond contributions. It'll be a joy if and when Newman takes home the piece. But man does it make me angry that not the master himself, superior in every way to all of them, was ever given the recognition he deserved.

    This was my very first indication ever that the Oscars can be, if they wish, a load of horse bugger.
    JWESTBROOK wrote:

    Oh yes, there's that too. ;-) You're right, friend. But let's say I'll keep it open till most opinions have been stated, and then we'll expand the title to a 'why didn't Barry ever get and oscar for his Bond scores' discussion. ;-) What do you think?
  • mdo007mdo007 Katy, Texas
    Posts: 259
    Also John Barry already won oscars not for Bond but other films he did like Born Free, and The Lion in Winter. He might not have won an oscar for Bond, but he did for other. So I don't know why's that a big deal.
  • Posts: 1,817
    The Academy doesn't have real knowledge of music, therefore neither about soundtracks. How can John Williams didn't won the Oscar for The Empire Strikes Back which is a masterpiece in terms of composition, instrumentation, themes complexity, and so on?
    John Barry's scores are also gems of contemporary music (not only soundtracks), so that too proves the lack of musical expertise in the Awards.
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    DarthDimi wrote:
    it is quite frankly hallucinating to conclude that in his lifetime he never received an Oscar

    I'm sorry?
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited January 2013 Posts: 24,256
    DarthDimi wrote:
    it is quite frankly hallucinating to conclude that in his lifetime he never received an Oscar

    I'm sorry?

    You might want to read the entire sentence, @TheWizardOfIce. :-) John Barry never received an Oscar for any of his Bond scores. He wasn't even nominated for one.
  • I think that back in the 60s there were more indie movies, or credible films, that might snare Oscars. Since the late 70s it's a blockbuster thing and money talks, there just aren't enough low-key credible films to be up for Oscars so they're happier to rope in other, less sophisticated fare. Now adults are unashamedly into Lord of the Rings, Batman, Bond and so on, may not have been seen that way back in the day.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,252
    It is difficult understand the Academy's judgement. In the category of Special Visual Effects, Ray Harryhausen, one of the all time giants in the field, never received an Oscar nomination. He was given a lifetime achievement award.
  • Posts: 11,119
    Mallory wrote:
    for a score that is unremarkable and not even close to Barry's scores.

    As Le Chiffre would say...

    "BUT YOU ARE SO... WRONG!!!"

    Newman's Skyfall score is great. Sure, its not what is considered a "traditional" Bond score (see Barry) or a 007-theme dependent score (see earlier Arnold) but that doesnt mean its unremarkable. It's remarkable in its own right.

    That's exactly why Thomas Newman scored an Oscar nomination with it. The ingenuity of Newman's score for 'Skyfall' is two sided:

    A) It still sounds Bond-esque, while not loosing Newman's own sound, but most importantly....
    B) It is Newman's first real action flick. For Newman this must have been quite a difficult process. The typical Newman sound mixed with traditional Bond elements resulted in a concoction that is, for Newman, one of the most original scores to date.

    And frankly? This is how the Oscars work. They are not solely a 'Price for the best', but also a recognition ánd encouragement to do this more often.

    And that's why I think the score for 'Skyfall' is a typical Bond score. But not only that! It's much more. It stands on its own as a very good score for simply a very good movie, apart from being a Bond score.
  • I pointed this out in the Oscar thread. I can't believe it either but that's how the Oscars work I suppose. Piss take really, the master of the Bond sound doesn't get one of his scores nominated but Newmans score (which most critics and fans thought was one of the weaker parts of SF) does?

    This only got nominated because it's Newman and I really hope it doesn't win.
  • Posts: 11,119
    I pointed this out in the Oscar thread. I can't believe it either but that's how the Oscars work I suppose. Piss take really, the master of the Bond sound doesn't get one of his scores nominated but Newmans score (which most critics and fans thought was one of the weaker parts of SF) does?

    This only got nominated because it's Newman and I really hope it doesn't win.

    I think you are not reading my arguments. I think 'we' Bond fans judge 'Skyfall' merely with a Bond eye. The Oscars judge films, not Bond films. Having said that.....I think that's the reason why 'Skyfall' gets the respect from the Academy with 5 Oscar nominations; a unique achievement. 'Skyfall' is finally much more than just another great Bond film. It's also a fantastic film.

    Concerning the arguments I just mentioned about Thomas Newman.......Read my statements above.

    What I don't understand is all this negative fuzz really. I mean.....for the past 31 years Bond fans have been criticising the Academy for not recognising franchise films. And for the past 31 years Bond fans have been saying that 007 should not look to those 'damn Oscars'.

    And now we finally get an Oscar nod for 'Best Music Score'....and we again focus on the negatives. Again, the Oscars are also prizes for encouragement and achievements. They are not necessarily ratings for the quality of films. PLEASE take that in mind.

    Also, for your sake, you could see it as a 'final recognition after all these years for the James Bond music'. Alas, no one will or can do that. Sad.

    From a promotion/advertisement point of view Bond doesn't need an Oscar at all. Smaller critical pictures, like 'Zero Dark Thirty', 'Life Of Pi', 'Argo', 'Moonrise Kingdom', 'The Master' and 'Silver Linings Playbook' in my opinion deserve an Oscar from the bigger categories more. Knowing that these one-time movies, not being part of a franchise, will never reach the 1 Billion Dollar gross, they deserve an Oscar in one of the bigger acting/best picture categories more than James Bond.

    Having said so, 'Skyfall' still gets 5 Oscar nods. What the hell are we whining about then :-). Still, I may sound a bit harsh, but that's my opinion.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 12,837
    Your argument was just you saying "nope, Newman was great, great Bond score and film score" and I disagree completely.

    I'm happy with Bond getting award recognition if I think Bond deserves it.

    I want Bond to win awards in things I think it deserves. I want Deakins to win, I want Bardem to win the Bafta, I wanted it to get a nomination for best picture. I don't think Newman deserves it frankly.

    By your logic Gustav we should've been happy if Die Another Day, A View To A Kill, etc, all got best picture nominations. Sure they weren't very good films and it would've taken away the chance of more deserving films but it's recognition at the Oscars, so what the hell would we be whining about?
  • 001001
    Posts: 1,575
    This is patently absurd and just goes to show how much of a joke the oscars are. Barry does incredible scores throughout the series but only gets nominated for his work outside of the series, as if Bond isn't good enough. Suddenly, Newman gets nominated on a critically acclaimed film (because that's the only reason they pay attention; also because it's a popularity contest) for a score that is unremarkable and not even close to Barry's scores. Same goes for Ken Adam. The only reason I'd watch this bollocks is if all the Bond's reunite, and even then not all the way through, I can't stand it.

    "You are so right". :)
    Stuff the oscars,everyone knows they are a prestigeous but flawed awards.

  • Posts: 15
    John Barry was and is in a class of his own with all his scores, and duly won 5 oscars for other great movies!! Bond films haven't been taken seriously by the academy in many areas, including music!? So therefore never won a best score or song gong! Until now?, where Adele may well break that mould!? Which is the really the only chance of an Oscar win, not even Roger Deakins will get a real sniff, not this time round!!!

    And what's more... Thomas newman will not win anyhow!! Life of pi, Michael Danna will!! Which if you've seen the film or heard that score can hear a mans life time of compositions round into one very moving score!!!

    Ps... Please.... Not John Williams "Lincoln" score to win!? Dull and oh so predictable!! :)>-
  • It will be a CRIMINAL ACT if Deakins and SF doesn't win for that magnificent cinematography, for what's been nominated in the 5 categories Deakins is easily the most deserving.
  • Posts: 11,119
    It will be a CRIMINAL ACT if Deakins and SF doesn't win for that magnificent cinematography, for what's been nominated in the 5 categories Deakins is easily the most deserving.

    Have you actually seen Claudia Miranda's cinematography on 'Life Of Pi'?
  • Posts: 15
    It will be a CRIMINAL ACT if Deakins and SF doesn't win for that magnificent cinematography, for what's been nominated in the 5 categories Deakins is easily the most deserving.

    Deakins cinematograph on skyfall is good, but really.... Nothing terribly new!? Just better than what's gone before on Bond!!!

    Life of pi... Is my bet!! Stunning work by Miranda!!!
  • It will be a CRIMINAL ACT if Deakins and SF doesn't win for that magnificent cinematography, for what's been nominated in the 5 categories Deakins is easily the most deserving.

    Have you actually seen Claudia Miranda's cinematography on 'Life Of Pi'?

    Yes, and I think Deakins did a better job.

  • Posts: 15
    It will be a CRIMINAL ACT if Deakins and SF doesn't win for that magnificent cinematography, for what's been nominated in the 5 categories Deakins is easily the most deserving.

    Have you actually seen Claudia Miranda's cinematography on 'Life Of Pi'?

    Yes, and I think Deakins did a better job.


    Better... On what's a totally different Movie experience!! Even Deakins would struggle with winning over some of the competition on offer, mainly Life of pi!!? Deakins best work isn't on skyfall but on other films his done like his Coen bros work!?

    Anyhow his not going to win, as won't Newman!!

    Adele is the only real contender!
  • quantumofsolacequantumofsolace England
    Posts: 279
    Why has the god-like Ennio Morricone never won an Oscar (not counting the honorary one a few years ago) when the god-awful Hans Zimmer has? Why did 'The Silence Of The Lambs' pick up the "big five" (deservedly, I might add) and yet Howard Shore's breathtaking score that contributed so much to the film never received so much as a nomination? AMPAS have been guilty of so many shocking oversights in every category (no Best Director gong for Sir Alfred Hitchcock? Insanity!) but you can multiply that by at least a hundred when it comes to score/song. Ah well. Moaning about it isn't going to change anything. The whole world knows how fantastic JB's JB scores were, are and forever will be. That's all that matters.
  • Penguin wrote:
    It will be a CRIMINAL ACT if Deakins and SF doesn't win for that magnificent cinematography, for what's been nominated in the 5 categories Deakins is easily the most deserving.

    Have you actually seen Claudia Miranda's cinematography on 'Life Of Pi'?

    Yes, and I think Deakins did a better job.


    Better... On what's a totally different Movie experience!! Even Deakins would struggle with winning over some of the competition on offer, mainly Life of pi!!? Deakins best work isn't on skyfall but on other films his done like his Coen bros work!?

    Anyhow his not going to win, as won't Newman!!

    Adele is the only real contender!

    Oh well, you say tomato I say tomahto.

  • Posts: 1,310
    Should the great John Barry have been nominated for one (or more) of his Bond scores?

    HELL YES.

    But is Neman's Skyfall score the best score we've had in years?

    HELL YES.
  • LicencedToKilt69007LicencedToKilt69007 Belgium, Wallonia
    Posts: 523
    Sir John Barry should have WON an Academy Award for his work on the serie.

    For some IMO, I typed on the right thread but at least the people from the Oscars must had given him an "honour award" for his career, when he stopped after TLD. (which was at -his- best, furthermore)

    The Oscars have been snobing 007 for too long and it isn't objective. Shall I call it "jealousy in disguise" ?

    Newman's score is a quite good one but certainly not in one of the best. Arnold's TND, TWINE should also had been awarded or minimum nominated (I include DAD score in nominations).
  • Posts: 1,713
    Seinfeld : "Newman !" :D
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,256
    DarthDimi wrote:
    DarthDimi wrote:
    it is quite frankly hallucinating to conclude that in his lifetime he never received an Oscar

    I'm sorry?

    You might want to read the entire sentence, @TheWizardOfIce. :-) John Barry never received an Oscar for any of his Bond scores. He wasn't even nominated for one.

    @TheWizardOfIce, I'm still in anticipation of your explanation of "I'm sorry?". I never figured out what it is about my post that made you say that. :-)
  • Like I said in another post. The whole Academy is an Old Boys Club. They decide on a few people who they really like and those guys always win the awards. Skyfall's score is nowhere near as strong as say The Living Daylights. But it's Newman that gets the Oscar nomination, why? Because he scored Road To Perdition and they were all over that remember? Part of the whole Mendes-Winslet-DiCaprio-Scorcese-Scott-Bigelow mafia that has pervaded the awards for the last decade.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 11,119
    Like I said in another post. The whole Academy is an Old Boys Club. They decide on a few people who they really like and those guys always win the awards. Skyfall's score is nowhere near as strong as say The Living Daylights. But it's Newman that gets the Oscar nomination, why? Because he scored Road To Perdition and they were all over that remember? Part of the whole Mendes-Winslet-DiCaprio-Scorcese-Scott-Bigelow mafia that has pervaded the awards for the last decade.

    That's your opinion off course, but actually quite untrue. First of all, age is no factor in inviting people to vote in a Academy Award category. Usually they are previous music composers....for the original score category. But they can be older but also younger. So to say the Academy is only an Old Boy Club is not entirely correct.

    Secondly, and I tried to explain that on many occasions, the Oscars are not prizes for 'Best Bond film'. They are cinematic prizes for 'Every film'. So in that sense, both Thomas Newman, Marvin Hamlisch and John Barry got deserved Oscar recognition. Both composers have been composing for great movies outside the Bond franchise as well.

    If you look into it in that way, then we can write down a number of facts regarding prizes won in the category 'Best Original Score':

    JOHN BARRY:
    Nominated for Academy Award: 7 times
    --> 'Born Free' (Original Song, 1966)
    --> 'Born Free' (Original Music Score, 1966)
    --> 'The Lion In Winter' (1968)
    --> 'Mary, Queen Of Scots' (1971)
    --> 'Out Of Africa' (1985)
    --> 'Dances With Wolves' (1990)
    --> 'Chaplin' (1992)

    Winning an Academy Award: 5 times
    --> 'Born Free' (Original Song, 1966)
    --> 'Born Free' (Original Music Score, 1966)
    --> 'The Lion In Winter' (1968)
    --> 'Out Of Africa' (1985)
    --> 'Dances With Wolves' (1990)

    MARVIN HAMLISCH:
    Nominated for Academy Award: 12 times
    --> 'Kotch' (Original Song, 1971)
    --> 'The Sting' (Original Song Score, 1973)
    --> 'The Way We Were' (Original Song, 1973)
    --> 'The Way We Were' (Original Score, 1973)
    --> 'The Spy Who Loved Me' (Original Song, 1977)
    --> 'The Spy Who Loved Me' (Original Score, 1977)
    --> 'Same Time, Next Year' (Original Song, 1978)
    --> 'Ice Castles' (Original Song, 1978)
    --> 'Sophie's Choice' (Original Score, 1982)
    --> 'A Chorus Line' (Original Song, 1985)
    --> 'Shirley Valentine' (Original Song, 1989)
    --> 'The Mirror Has Two Faces' (Original Song, 1996)

    Winning an Academy Award: 3 times
    --> 'The Sting' (Original Song Score, 1973)
    --> 'The Way We Were' (Original Song, 1973)
    --> 'The Way We Were' (Original Score, 1973)

    BILL CONTI:
    Nominated for Academy Award: 3 times
    --> 'Rocky' (Original Song, 1976)
    --> 'For Your Eyes Only' (Original Song, 1981)
    --> 'The Right Stuff' (Original Score, 1983)

    Winning an Academy Award: 1 time
    --> 'The Right Stuff' (Original Score, 1983)

    THOMAS NEWMAN:
    Nominated for Academy Award: 11 times
    --> 'The Shawshank Redemption' (1994)
    --> 'Little Women' (1994)
    --> 'Unstrung Heroes' (1995)
    --> 'American Beauty' (1999)
    --> 'Road To Perdition' (2002)
    --> 'Finding Nemo' (2003)
    --> 'Lemony Snicket's A Series Of Unfortunate Events' (2004)
    --> 'The Good German' (2006)
    --> 'WALL·E' (Original Song, 2008)
    --> 'WALL·E' (Original Score, 2008)
    --> 'Skyfall' (2012)

    Winning an Academy Award: N O N E


    So who's treating who unfair now? Thomas Newman got snubbed a total of 11 times. So I find it a bit arrogant if we only judge the work of the above composers solely on their Bond stuff. Now Thomas Newman gets nominated for an 11th time, and all we can say is 'How the hell was he nominated for an Oscar??'

    Reputation and better credentials outside the Bond universe are equally important. They are not judged solely on their Bond work but their entire cinematic work. Also, the Oscar is in part awarded as some kind of achievement for their overall work on music scores and/or original songs.

    Now my personal opinion. I think this really was Thomas Newman's first time he did compose a score for an action blockbuster. I think for him personally it must have been pretty tricky to start working on such a franchise, as he usually composed slow-tempo dramatic scores for drama films ('American Beauty' his most famous example). It takes a lot of creativity, ingenuity and inspiration to come up with his own original take on a action blockbuster, and especially on a Bond score.

    And I think he pulled it off. He did something extraordinary. In my opinion it is my favourite score for a Bond film ever since John Barry did 'The Living Daylights'. The reason John Barry never got nominated for a Bond score? Really, for Barry himself, and he admitted it many times, working on a Bond film was a welcome formularic period....a fun period! And allthough his Bond scores still sound fantastic -I love them- I think he was way more inspiring ánd original in his scores for 'Dances With Wolves' and 'Out Of Africa'.

    So I don't understand all the anger surrounding Thomas Newman's Oscar nomination for 'Skyfall'. In a way it also shows us that 'Skyfall' is not only taken serious as a Bond film, but also as a great cinematic achievement apart from being Bond.

    I have heard the music score from 'Life Of Pi', composed by Michael Danna. I love it, it won the Golden Globe and it is considered a frontrunner in winning the Oscar. Alexandre Desplat's score for 'Argo' could win too. But I wouldn't be surprised if Thomas Newman actually wins the Oscar for 'Best Original Score' after 10 missed wins.
Sign In or Register to comment.