Bond's 50th Annavisary...a Disapointment

002002
edited January 2013 in Bond Movies Posts: 581
i was thinking in retrospect of 2012 being the 50th annavisary of James Bond felt rather disapointing:

* We had only 1 Documentary (Which isnt avalible to people outside the UK- as far as we know)
* We had a Video Game (which is one of the worst bond games of all time)
* we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome
* The BluRay/Dvd Boxset...basically ripping off people who bought the 2006 Dvd sets- atleast Casino Royale's menu was in line with the other 20 Bond Film unlike QOS which unevens the whole boxset)

did anyone else feel disapointed by the lack of Bond celebrations?

Comments

  • Major_BoothroydMajor_Boothroyd Republic of Isthmus
    edited January 2013 Posts: 2,722
    This has been covered ad nauseum but I wasn't particularly disappointed - gave me the opportunity to buy the blu-ray because I hadn't bought the DVDs (had the VHS' so glad I held off on the DVDs)
    I bought books i had been holding off on - battle for bond, making of OHMSS etc.

    Also don't forget the James Bond archives - that is a pretty awesome book.

    The game was rubbish but kinda to be expected considering Bond games' patchy past.

    Agree with you on the QOS menu - that vexed me as to why they didn't change it!

    Your idea for a movie is insane and would have made Bond fans spontaneously internally combust.
  • Posts: 11,119
    002 wrote:
    i was thinking in retrospect of 2012 being the 50th annavisary of James Bond felt rather disapointing:

    * We had only 1 Documentary (Which isnt avalible to people outside the UK- as far as we know)
    * We had a Video Game (which is one of the worst bond games of all time)
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome
    * The BluRay/Dvd Boxset...basically ripping off people who bought the 2006 Dvd sets- atleast Casino Royale's menu was in line with the other 20 Bond Film unlike QOS which unevens the whole boxset)

    did anyone else feel disapointed by the lack of Bond celebrations?

    No! %-(
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    edited January 2013 Posts: 9,117
    002 wrote:
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome


    As others have said this has been more than covered already but I couldnt let that stand. Quite probably the worst idea...(Clarkson-esque pause for breath)... in the world.

    I'd rather let Lee Tamahori back than give you any creative control over a Bond film. Dear Christ.

    And what the hell is an 'Annavisary'?
  • 002002
    Posts: 581
    This has been covered ad nauseum but I wasn't particularly disappointed - gave me the opportunity to buy the blu-ray because I hadn't bought the DVDs (had the VHS' so glad I held off on the DVDs)
    I bought books i had been holding off on - battle for bond, making of OHMSS etc.

    Also don't forget the James Bond archives - that is a pretty awesome book.

    i actually didnt know about the James Bond archives- the only book i knew was Roger Moore's Bond on Bond which was rather entertaining

    The game was rubbish but kinda to be expected considering Bond games' patchy past.

    thats true enough
    Agree with you on the QOS menu - that vexed me as to why they didn't change it!

    Your idea for a movie is insane and would have made Bond fans spontaneously internally combust.

    * It could have been a one off Special like a Tv Movie or something...idk maybe i have been watching too much doctor who...wait would Sponaneously combust be a bad thing? and also my friend said that they did consider back in the 80s to bring Dalton, Moore and Connery together in an adventure together but then they decided to do The Living Daylights
  • 002002
    Posts: 581
    002 wrote:
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome


    I'd rather let Lee Tamahori back than give you any creative control over a Bond film. Dear Christ.

    And what the hell is an 'Annavisary'?

    FFS i was just saying it would be an awesome idea to see Multiple Bonds together
    and yes sorry "anniversary"
  • TheWizardOfIceTheWizardOfIce 'One of the Internet's more toxic individuals'
    Posts: 9,117
    002 wrote:
    FFS i was just saying it would be an awesome idea to see Multiple Bonds together

    No it wouldnt. It would be and is a shite idea.

    Bond actors at the oscars or SF premiere yes but your concept is so beyond bad that I'd prefer the Jinx spin off we never got.
  • Major_BoothroydMajor_Boothroyd Republic of Isthmus
    Posts: 2,722
    002 wrote:
    FFS i was just saying it would be an awesome idea to see Multiple Bonds together

    No it wouldnt. It would be and is a shite idea.

    Bond actors at the oscars or SF premiere yes but your concept is so beyond bad that I'd prefer the Jinx spin off we never got.

    The Jinx film would have been abysmal. You can see EON's mentality - it might have worked as a cash cow - Halle berry had just won an Oscar and was yet to commit the cinematic hate crime that was Catwoman - but the Jinx character was so bland, it's difficult to know how they would have made it anything other than rubbish.
  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    edited January 2013 Posts: 24,256
    Moved to Bond movies. the General discussion forum is for non-Bond topics. :-)

    002 wrote:
    i was thinking in retrospect of 2012 being the 50th annavisary of James Bond felt rather disapointing:

    Interesting remarks, @002. Here's what I think:
    002 wrote:
    * We had only 1 Documentary (Which isnt avalible to people outside the UK- as far as we know)

    But man, what a documentary!! I love EoN. Adds so much to what we already knew. It is available outside the UK. I watched it on Belgian television recently for starters. Turns out it will be made available in other ways as well and quite soon at that.

    Look, I rather have one two hour documentary in which I learn new things, than a rechewing of the old gadgets - girls - stunts compilation shows we've seen too many of. For additional information, I turn to the DVD's: the inside documentaries, the makings ofs, the story behind Casino Royale's film rights, ...
    002 wrote:
    * We had a Video Game (which is one of the worst bond games of all time)

    I can't judge that one yet. ;-)
    002 wrote:
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome

    Nah, not in my book. SF is a bloody good Bond and that's all I need really. DAD was soaked in extra's back in 2002 but left a sour taste. Ultimately, the film is what I want, the film is what I desire to be good. Also, I certainly wouldn't like fancy mash-ups with multiple former Bonds. A celebration needs to be honouring, not mocking.
    002 wrote:
    * The BluRay/Dvd Boxset...basically ripping off people who bought the 2006 Dvd sets- atleast Casino Royale's menu was in line with the other 20 Bond Film unlike QOS which unevens the whole boxset)

    I would consider it a rip-off if they had turned out something entirely different. That way those who bought the former release of the DVD's would almost be forced to 'upgrade'. This is exactly the kind of selling tricks that give George Lucas a bad name. ;-)
    002 wrote:
    did anyone else feel disapointed by the lack of Bond celebrations?

    No. I never needed or wanted anything besides one . bloody . good . Bond.

    And I got it. :x
  • 002002
    Posts: 581
    you do raise a lot of good points DarthDimi

  • Posts: 1,492
    [quote="002" i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome
    [/quote]

    Quelle horror!

    Worst idea in the world.If Eon had gone down that route they would be an international DAD laughing stock.

    Regarding the anniversary well we loved the exhibtion at the Barbican so the 50th was OK by us.

  • Posts: 1,052
    I thought the EON documentary was pretty lame and I would have liked to have seen the older films re-released on the big screen but all in all there was plenty of attention thrown at Bond.
  • 002 wrote:

    and also my friend said that they did consider back in the 80s to bring Dalton, Moore and Connery together in an adventure together but then they decided to do The Living Daylights[/b]

    Your friend is just making this up. Or, someone else made this up and told your friend. There's zero truth to this at all.
  • Despite agreeing that the 50th celebrations were fairly crap overall (although we did get a good film which is what matters most at the end of the day), that multiple Bond idea of yours sounds terrible, sorry.
  • Data_ThiefData_Thief Banned
    Posts: 75
    I'm disappointed mainly with skyfall. I was expecting a fresh new serious bond film, instead I got was a kiddy action adventure constantly giving homage to past bond moments. The movie was very subpar. I am glad Sean Connery had nothing to do with The 50th anniversary , because he knows the Brocolli family is all about money, Connery knew he was just going to be used and exploited for the soul porpoise of marketing skyfall.
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 12,837
    Data_Thief wrote:
    I'm disappointed mainly with skyfall. I was expecting a fresh new serious bond film, instead I got was a kiddy action adventure constantly giving homage to past bond moments. The movie was very subpar.

    You're just giving yourself away more and more. Please just go away, we don't want you on this site.
    Data_Thief wrote:
    I am glad Sean Connery had nothing to do with The 50th anniversary , because he knows the Brocolli family is all about money, Connery knew he was just going to be used and exploited for the soul porpoise of marketing skyfall.

    Hilarious. Sean "tax dodging and has had a long lasting grudge with EON for years because he didn't get paid enough" Connery didn't do the documentary or anything because he doesn't like people who only care about money.

    No, it's not because of his health or because of his grudge with EON, he had nothing to do with the 50th because he doesn't want to be exploited by people who just want money. Makes sense!
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    002 wrote:
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome

    Where can I get whatever it is you're smoking?
  • RC7RC7
    edited January 2013 Posts: 10,512
    002 wrote:
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome

    Jesustittyf***ingchrist. Aside from the fact you were hoping for more (seriously, do you read, or have any investment in anything relating to popular culture and the logic of how a film franchise works?) that is possibly the single worst idea I've ever heard. I'm astonished.

    BABS: 'Hey Michael, I was thinking. You know that Bond stuff we churn out every couple of years?'

    MGW: 'Yeah, Babs?

    BABS: 'How about we royally f*** it?'

    MGW: 'Go on...'

    BABS: 'That Kiwi guy, the one who thought cardboard cut-outs of ice on a runway was an acceptable peice of set decoration...'

    MGW: 'Tamagotchi?'

    BABS: 'Yeah, well he had that great codename theory, remember?'

    MGW: 'Come to think of it, it was rather good wasn't it? Especially if we wanted to completely ass-**** the living bejesus out of our family's legacy'.

    BABS: 'How about we run with it?'

    MGW: 'I'm not sure. As fantastic as it sounds, Mendes already signed on for Skyfall?'

    BABS: 'Yeah, but we'd have Brosnan, Craig, and Dalton, Roger could be retired...'

    MGW: 'Hell to the yes, and maybe George could run a Florist's in Wimbledon where the wreaths for the countless victims of the double-0's are meticulously woven.'

    BABS: 'You're getting subversive again, Michael.'

    MGW: 'Sorry, I'm just bloody excited about all this. I could literally scream.'

    BABS: 'Look...'

    MGW: 'What?'

    BABS: 'Here, on this fansite... somebody with exactly, and I mean exactly, the same idea. Either he's bugged our office or he's a god damn, ruddy-bloody genius. **** Skyfall!!!!!!!! **** Mendes!!!!!!!

    MGW: 'Ha ha! **** Skyfall, it's time to unleash SKYBOLLOCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    F-bombs removed by mods.
  • Data_ThiefData_Thief Banned
    Posts: 75
    Data_Thief wrote:
    I'm disappointed mainly with skyfall. I was expecting a fresh new serious bond film, instead I got was a kiddy action adventure constantly giving homage to past bond moments. The movie was very subpar.

    You're just giving yourself away more and more. Please just go away, we don't want you on this site.
    Data_Thief wrote:
    I am glad Sean Connery had nothing to do with The 50th anniversary , because he knows the Brocolli family is all about money, Connery knew he was just going to be used and exploited for the soul porpoise of marketing skyfall.

    Hilarious. Sean "tax dodging and has had a long lasting grudge with EON for years because he didn't get paid enough" Connery didn't do the documentary or anything because he doesn't like people who only care about money.

    No, it's not because of his health or because of his grudge with EON, he had nothing to do with the 50th because he doesn't want to be exploited by people who just want money. Makes sense!

    You do know most tax payers money is funding government sponsored terrorism including illegal drone attacks ? and overpaid politician salaries ...but thats another issue. And I dont blame Sean for moving out of Scotland, he wants independence for his country! and by god he is right for wanting so, the united kingdom is a total mess, my god there's not even a first or second amendment and the violence and crime is sky high! my god London has become Londonistan, the EU is destroying Europe. You're not even allowed to purchase anything over 500 dollars in cash, or you need a credit card to do so...and unfortunately America is currently being taken over by the new world order ..the world is ran by a global corrupt elite
  • Posts: 3,327
    002 wrote:
    * we only had 1 Bond movie (Skyfall yes was pretty good but i was hoping for more)- mainly i wanted to see a Special Multi-Bond Story with Brosnan, Craig and Dalton teaming up against an enemy..yes i know people dont want to admit the theroy that bond is a codename but still its 50 years and it would have been awesome
    Awesome for you, yes. Meanwhile, everyone else on Planet Earth would be absolutely horrified by the idea, but never mind. The men in white coats should be along soon to bring your afternoon tea and biscuits to your padded cell......

  • Posts: 3,327
    Data_Thief wrote:
    [
    You do know most tax payers money is funding government sponsored terrorism including illegal drone attacks ? and overpaid politician salaries ...but thats another issue. And I dont blame Sean for moving out of Scotland, he wants independence for his country! and by god he is right for wanting so, the united kingdom is a total mess, my god there's not even a first or second amendment and the violence and crime is sky high! my god London has become Londonistan, the EU is destroying Europe. You're not even allowed to purchase anything over 500 dollars in cash, or you need a credit card to do so...and unfortunately America is currently being taken over by the new world order ..the world is ran by a global corrupt elite
    Never mind. The men in white coats should be along soon to bring your afternoon tea and biscuits to your padded cell......


  • Data_ThiefData_Thief Banned
    Posts: 75
    yeah, stay blind to government corruption. You're choice
  • Posts: 3,327
    Data_Thief wrote:
    yeah, stay blind to government corruption. You're choice
    Ok will do....and keep trolling while you're at it. I'm 100% certain everyone here is listening with avid interest to your opinions.

  • DarthDimiDarthDimi Behind you!Moderator
    Posts: 24,256
    @Data_Thief, please let us not forget that this thread is about Bond's 50th anniversary.
  • Data_Thief wrote:
    You do know most tax payers money is funding government sponsored terrorism including illegal drone attacks ? and overpaid politician salaries ...but thats another issue.

    Ok this should erase any doubts. Mods, please ban him again.
    Data_Thief wrote:
    And I dont blame Sean for moving out of Scotland, he wants independence for his country!

    I didn't mention Scotland at all. But while we're on that subject, Sean loves his country so much he accepted a knighthood, and despite the fact that he's living in the Bahamas as a tax exile he still bangs on about UK politics.
    Data_Thief wrote:
    my god there's not even a first or second amendment

    This is hilarious.
    Data_Thief wrote:
    the violence and crime is sky high! my god London has become Londonistan, the EU is destroying Europe. You're not even allowed to purchase anything over 500 dollars in cash, or you need a credit card to do so...and unfortunately America is currently being taken over by the new world order ..the world is ran by a global corrupt elite

    And also kind of sad. Why am I replying to you?
  • edited January 2013 Posts: 2,171
    I think it's been a great 50th anniversary:

    Good:
    Skyfall was amazing
    Bond in Motion was amazing (visited)
    Designing 007 was decent, if not amazing (visited)
    The James Bond Archives is a great, if slightly superficial book
    The Top Gear 50th Anniversary Show was fun
    The 50Th Anniversary Concert was well performed
    Everything or Nothing was a well researched and presented film.
    Bond 50 Blu-ray box set (yeah it's a shame about the QoS Blu)

    Bad:
    No vintage Bond released in cinemas (would have loved to see FYEO on the big screen)
    007 legends was absolute garbage
    No new Sideshow 2012 Bond figures (wishful thinking though)
    No extended/deluxe Quantum of Solace DVD/Blu Ray

    All in all, 9/10.
  • The odd thing about this site is, I do agree with DataThief, his comments make sense. I really feel that Rog is on a retainer by praising and promoting the Bond films still, there must be something in it for him. I don't blame Connery for staying out of it, it does seem to me they use his classic films (and Rog's to be fair) to bolster the franchise and keep it popular, rather than having the current films to exist on their own merits.

    It wasn't like that in Rog's day, they preferred to pretend Connery didn't exist, they sort of created their own vibe, their own world. Just M, Q and Moneypenny existed from the previous days.

    Oh, okay, the stuff about the new world order is a bit wacky, why not the freemasons too?

    Anyway, I'd have liked to have seen some Bond films reissued on the big screen in London but guess it may have clashed with Skyfall.
Sign In or Register to comment.