It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Definitely.
There's Star Trek: The Animated Series, so that might be good. And each episode (22 in total) is 30 minutes long, so that's in your time frame. :)
Thought have that but it's still on the box and not a book, but thanks dude, I'd rather blood her in with the kirk and co when she's a bit older. the animated series did feature the original cast didn't it?
Yes, Everyone except for Chekov. I consider it the last 2 years of the five year mission. :)
What are you talking about?
Reviews starting to come in
That set is amazing!!!! :O Roll on May when we finally get to see it!!!! \:D/ <:-P
Kirk and McCoy in that Klingon prison
The murder of Gorkin
Kim Cattrall as a Vulcan
Christopher Plummer as the main villain
This movie has so many memorable moments and characters but is often overlooked and forgotten. I highly recommend it and yes, I think it is less violent than Wrath of Khan and less scary than First Contact.
Speaking of First Contact, didn't the Borg look so much more terrifying on the big screen than they ever looked on TNG?
Undiscovered Country was awesome (and a great Cold War analog).
I happened to like All Good Things, even though it was an odd-numbered Trek... wait... Oh, yeah, Movie Number Seven was Generations. Oops.
First Contact was my favorite movie until Star Trek came out (and I'm sure that'll be surpassed by Into Darkness).
Nemesis was good (I think), mainly because I liked the battle scenes near the end (Enterprise and 2 Romulan Warbirds vs. Shinzon's ship, c'mon, that was awesome).
Anyway, when Roddenberry saw the script for WRATH he fired off many angry memos to the producers. He did not like Spock dying, he hated the characterzations, and he really dispised the battle scenes between Enterprise and Reliant. I guess after flying bomber missions in WW2 he really was never a fan of any storyline that used battle scenes.
Despite creating the phenomen Star Trek Roddenberry was not much of a writer. Some of the better eps were not written by him and with all his nasty notes on WRATH, this is the most beloved and many will argue THE BEST OF THE TREK FILMS.
This is not a knock on Gene Roddenberry, he was a genius in many ways but the films were best served without him.
The Best: STAR TREK III SEARCH FOR SPOCK
The Worst: Pick one: INSURRECTION or STAR TREK V
Actually Search for Spock is the only odd numbered film that I enjoyed. It came out in the summer of 1984 and went up against Indiana Jones and the Temple of Doom, Gremlins, Ghostbusters, and a few other summer hits. It held it's own and is quite good.
None of them (odd numbered Treks) could hold a candle to Search for Spock
Trek movies are harder to rate for me than Bond movies; I love 1,2,3,4,6, and I like 5 a lot, regardless of the dopey stuff & bad FX.
But the movies after Undiscovered Country are all sort of just okay-to-meh for me.
Personally I always liked the Romulans and found them more endearing than the Klingon Empire. The Klingons had more episodes (TOS) devoted to them and their ruthlessness than the Romulans. Maybe the Powers to be just felt they were more interesting and made for better TV. I don't know.
I would compare the Klingons to Japan in the late 1800's to 1940's.
While the Romulans were more like the Soviet Union from 1920-1991