It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Russia's a great, Hitchcockian-style spy story, Goldfinger is a stylish thriller and Thunderball is a sprawling, brawny spectacle.
Ralph Fiennes summed it up perfectly at the Premiere when asked what his favourite Bond movie was - "From Russia With Love, because of its fidelity to the book" - what a superb turn of phrase!
This movie has some much going on and is such an original even today that you must be an utter non-Bondfan not recognizing the greatness presented in this movie.
Do we consider this apt description of the film? I've always thought this but I was recently looking up paranoia and it seems to suggest that it has more to do with an irrational base. But to me all the paranoia in FRWL seems to come from a very rational place. Nonetheless i still feel that FRWL to this day remains the perfect definition of a paranoid espionage thriller.
Would you agree that movie is a rather paranoid affair? With all the characters being suspicious of each other and with everyone tailing each other throughout. Ive always felt this, especially with scenes of Bond being watched at the airport, checking his hotel rooms and the mere fact that the big bad's face never gets revealed. It's pure espionage storytelling at it's best.
I love when Bond checks his rooms for bugs. We see it again in OHMSS when Bond does a once over in his Piz Gloria room, but after the early Connery era and the 69 effort it seems to be a lost piece of the films that I miss dearly. I would love for Dan's Bond to check his room for a device of some sort, as a sort of call back to the classic films.
http://theincrediblesuit.blogspot.co.uk/2011/02/blogalongabond-2-from-russia-with-love.html
http://commentdecine.wordpress.com/2009/05/09/from-russia-with-love-spies-spy-on-spies/
https://moviefilmreviews.wordpress.com/2012/05/08/retrospective-from-russia-with-love-1963/#more-1253
However, paranoia in its general definition means: 'Suspicion and mistrust of people or their actions without evidence or justification', but it seems to be me that Bond and all the other characters have sufficient evidence to chase the enemy. I suppose this is probably the justification as to why the cold war went on for so long.
Here's an interesting analysis of the film over at Roger Ebert's site.
Interesting, although I disagree with Ebert about GF being better: IMO FRWL is by far the best Bond. Ever, actually. It is certainly the most intelligent.
And your reasons for this would be?...
If you want to make wild assertions like "FRWL doesn't hold a candle to modern Bond films" then you should back it up with your reasons why.
As for my reasons: http://mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/comment/260493#Comment_260493
Thanks for your interest. Move along, little troll man.
Speak for yourself friendo.
Yes, I think the irony of his last comment has been totally lost on him
Are these actual reasons? Seem more like incoherent ramblings to me or, to coin the term du jour, drivel.
Many others failed to achieve greatness because they deviated way too fare.
Now that eon are creating their own, strongly Flemingesque, plots a la 'Skyfall' - the future looks great. Particularly with the great Mr.Mendes at the helm.