It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I don't like MR and find it poor, however I can give him praise in some aspects: Longsdale, some scenes are genuinely chilling, for instance. But yes it is miles better than DAD and is certainly not as universally disliked.
Goldfinger may be the general's public consensual Bond movie, but when it comes to both fans and critiques, I say FRWL, who is also praised by people who were or are involved in making Bond movies.
I think that LALD is universally identified as being average. I certainly view it as that.
And I doubt you'll find many people to disagree with you on LALD, whether they consider it rather good or rather bad.
Live and Let Die is one of the "so okay it's average" movies. I'd put Tomorrow Never Dies, Octopussy and maybe Thunderball or You Only Live Twice in there too. There are some outliers who love and hate each of them, but for the most part you'll find them residing solidly in the middle.
Agreed. All of those releases are in the middle of my ranking.
Yes but both TB and OP have also strong admirers (me among them) and in TB's case many find it up there in quality with the early Bond. So it is a more controversial Bond movie. Same with TND, which has its admirers and its detractors, who think the Brosnan tenure started going wrong with it. LALD has never as far as I know stirred passions here on anywhere else. First of the Moore Bonds, not his best, somewhat faithful to Fleming but pale compared to the novel, and overall nobody seems to think much of it.
They are off series, but both CR67 and NSNA are pretty much universally hated, at least by the fans.
It is the other way round for me: I always end up enjoying it much more than I thought and more than I think it objectively deserves. There are some great moments, some impressive stunts, but it is very, very, very flawed. That said, I can't help but love the B movie feel.
Has it? It always struck me as one of the most forgotten Bond movies.
Maybe I'm wrong, but I've always got the impression it is fairly well remembered, the theme song being a big help of course.
Around here it seems to be very well remembered. If I got a nickel for every time someone said it was their first Bond film, I'd be a rich man. It obviously has a lot of nostalgic appeal for fans because of that, and since it was Roger's first with an eerie, voodoo inspired plot, it has a very new feeling to it as Bond enters the 70s in true form.
Exactly. In the general public everyone remember the song and thus the title. But that's it. It remains under the radar otherwise. A shame because it has a lot going for it and in many ways I prefer it to Moore's more famous ones. But it is pale compared to the novel.
There's a thread made by yours truly on this: http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/6934/general-public-perceptions-of-bond/p2#Item_40
Other than your list, people remember the volcano lair in You Only Live Twice, that Bond was married in On Her Majesty's Secret Service, Brosnan's jump in Goldeneye and possibly the evil 00 and Elektra King as the female villain. Casino Royale has the freerunning sequence and Bond tied to the chair. QoS has the apartment complex at the end, and Skyfall has Silva's introduction and the Tennyson run.