It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
If you read the comments on this thread, you will see that it may not have been bad, and indeed could have dramatically change Moore take on Bond and his whole tenure.
So much of the 'action' in early OHMSS is based on fistfights, which of course Moore couldn't really do. Also, having him being given the runaround by Draco's henchmen would make him look more clownish than it did with Lazenby.
Surprised to read about Moore's acting ability on this thread, he didn't have much range. I wonder how Lazenby would have fared in TSWLM?
Very good question. Depends which Connery.
Connery FRWL = NO. Connery DAF = YES
Read the thread. Would Moore have acted the same way with the OHMSS script as we know it?
Moore had the perfect introduction four years later in Live and Let Die. I think any sooner would of been inappropriate, and as for Tim Dalton turning down the chance at the end of the 1960s, it's a good thing common sense prevailed, as simply couldn't envisage the actor being Bond at such a young age. He also, made his Bond introduction at the right age. Once again, Moore could of been Bond for OHMSS, without question, but would never want anyone else in the role other than Lazenby for that. He did a more than adequate job
1) OHMSS would've been a radically different film.
Or
2) Roger Moore would've been a radically different Bond.
Since the Moore era hadn't already begun I'm sort of leaning towards option 2 to be honest, although I don't think OHMSS was suited to Moore and I don't think he would've done as well as Lazenby (I do prefer Moore as Bond in general though).
Well said. Moore could have handled it just fine. The film would have changed a bit (in some places for the better and some for the worse) but with a such a great story and wonderful supporting cast it's hard to go wrong here. Likewise, Dalton and even post YOLT Connery could have gotten the job done just fine but at the end of the day I'm glad we got Georgie Porgie.
Pierce Brosnan was all of 15 when OHMSS was being filmed, but anyway, I feel he would've been disastrous in the role, especially in the more emotional, insular scenes. I my head, there's no chemistry between him and Rigg. Nope.
Timothy Dalton was in his twenties...so too young. Otherwise, he might've been pretty good. In my head, he would've had okay chemistry with Rigg. I dunno.
Roger Moore. Old enough at the time, to be sure, but no. Just no. I can't picture him and Rigg together at all on screen. Not a bad actor at all, but for the more emotional, romantic parts? No no.
Sean Connery would be the best choice besides Lazenby. But even then I'm unsure how he would come off with Rigg or the more emotional parts. Who knows.
George Lazenby was right on for pretty much the whole film and had great on-screen chemistry with Diana Rigg as Tracy, the best Bond girl of them all. Why change what works so well already?
Well, this is not the point of this thread, obviously. It is a completely speculative topic.
And we would have thought it had been made for him because of his role in The Saint.
And if DAF was adjusted so that Bond killed Blofeld out of revenge here, not only do I think DAF would have been better, but we wouldn't have that stupid Helicopter PTS in FYEO, either. What I wouldn't give to have a glimpse into that alternate universe.
No... ...
Surely most of the threads on here are speculitive, there wouldn't be much to talk about if people didn't ask these kind of questions.
It does seem the biggest irony is that Connery so say wanted something to sink his teeth into and yet OHMSS was the most character driven film in the series.
Would Rog have been too associated with the Saint in 1969?
....you are joking right?
i would have swapped Lazenby with Dalton...even if Dalton was young at the time
Yes.
Agreed. However, speculating about Moore in OHMSS makes me think of using bread sticks instead of cucumbers to make pickles. It's a completely inappropriate use of a very good product, in my opinion.
There was no point in going further for me. Not everyone who comments on these forums has to write an essay response.
No need to get your pickled bread sticks in a twist.
Would Moore have played it the same way after YOLT as DAF? Doubtful. In a way, DAF's success derailed the entire series because it set the tone for the '70s and first half of the '80s.
Dead on correct here. This isn't to say that Moore isn't an excellent and diverse actor who could take on a harder edge, but he doesn't fight well enough and that aspect is huge in OHMSS. I think he would have done better at Piz Gloria as he and Connery were the best when it came to copious shagging, but probably no better or worse in the Tracy scenes. As for Brosnan he is a good actor, but he's not good enough to do what Craig did in CR.
Yes but he was busy doing the final series of The Saint.