Reporting For Duty
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
Controversial opinions about the books
MrBond
Station S
I've searched around to see if there's any thread about this topic that already exists. But i haven't found one, but if there is one. Feel free to close this.
So, what's your controversial opinion about the books?
The first i can pick from the top of my head is:
I find YOLT very overrated!
So, what's your controversial opinion about the books?
The first i can pick from the top of my head is:
I find YOLT very overrated!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I find TSWLM a good book with Fleming looking for another way to express himself and while doing that he gives us a view on James Bond from a non-Intelligence based person who sees a dangerous Englishman doing a job of saving people.
A look on 007 from the outside, and a nice noir tale on the side.
I would not mind seeing this story incorperated in a PTS for DC.
Anyway here's mine, posted it in the other controversial opinions thread but nobody replied: Goldfinger is one of the best Bond novels. The story is a bit stupid, and the way Fleming writes about lesbians and Koreans cringe worthy to say the least but GF is a great villain, Oddjob is a brilliant henchman (him being given the cat to eat is proper creepy), Bond is at his most human (really fleshed out well) and just like all the Fleming books it's so descriptive that you can't stop reading it (I'm normally a slow reader but it didn't take me long to finish any of the Bond books).
I also like how it ties into CR and DAF. Nice bit of continuity. Plus, Bond is in an Aston for the first time. There's a lot to like there imo.
I agree that Spy is quite good. Indeed, from a purely literary standpoint, it is some of Fleming's finest work. He's really at the height of his powers here.
I regard GF as quite possibly Fleming's worst. When dealing with Bond, one must suspend belief, but with GF, it's simply a bridge too far (much like DAD in the filmic oeuvre). The dialogue Fleming puts in the American gangsters' mouths is also quite farcical.
Indeed. And he makes such a believable, lead female character and narrator.
Yes. And her life story is literally painful to read at times. To say Viv is unlucky at love is an understatement!
Not a terribly controversial opinion in decades past - Amis catalogued all sorts of howlers like this - but these days people have forgotten that Fleming's skill wasn't in his plotting (which was Silva-level most of the time), but in his ability to paper over these deficiencies.
That's quite controversial. Especially what you mention from OHMSS.
Blofeld think's that Bond is Sir Hilary throughout the time when Bond is at Piz Gloria. Although Bond knows that it is just a matter of time before Blofeld starts to suspect something, hence why Bond leaves.
Blofeld asks Bond about his knowledge about 007 just because Campbell accused Bond for being 007.
That isn't dumb, it was cleverly written.
It's just a contrivance to get Bond out of Piz Gloria and onto the slopes.
(Oh and fix your security system, genius. Even your non-superspy patients can get out of their rooms!)
Actually I would agree with Bond returning all damaged and attempting a hit on his boss, which I consider a brilliant idea.
Bond is then send out to redeem himself, not unlike YOLT with a friend from the past helping him and refinding his old self and certainties. The last paragraph is about his independance and how he will guard it in the future in order to save him from grief shows how James Bond has become full circle since the 2nd novel of the SPECTRE/Blofeld trilogy.
Hardly a howler. Merely a mistake by Blofeld, not by Fleming.
We don't know precisely when Blofeld bowls Bray out as Bond. Fleming/Bond makes clear that it all depends upon how long Campbell can hold out and keep his wits about him. It is entirely possible, even likely that Blofeld and his goons only broke Campbell moments before Bond overhears the fatwa on the intercom.
Blofeld is too much of an egocentric man to realize that he has been infiltrated. It isn't sloppy writing.
While what you say is factually accurate, it's irrelevant. Blofeld suspects Bray of being Bond enough to sweat Campbell. What's more, Blofeld knows that if Bray is Bond, then Bond knows that Blofeld holds this suspicion - a very dangerous prospect for Blofeld (and one that leads to his undoing). Bond is aware of this fact and Blofeld is aware of this fact, ergo...Bray is sent back to his room unguarded? It boggles.
No, again, it's a dramatic contrivance used to bring about an action sequence.
But Bond/Fleming make clear again and again that Blofeld's snobbery is an unreconstructed mania for him. So much so that it becomes a blind spot. Blofeld so desperately wants to be ennobled that he is willing to risk yet another of his grandiose enterprises, and yes, even his own life in order to attain recognition. Highly intelligent people, even geniuses, do dumb things when motivated by primal passions.
Blofeld is fearful enough to torture a man to death in order to protect his enterprise, but fails to isolate the very threat he fears? There's no blind spot (which you use in the sense of motivations obscuring realizations - something I agree is la folie of Fleming's villains), it's a problem of motivations being unconnected with actions.
The story of Vivienne is interesting as she is a depressive and wounded person (although there is much misogyny in the text). It reminded me of an Italian novel I read many years ago by Cesare Pavese (The beautiful summer).
What exactly do you mean by that?
I do not see that as a XIXth writer percee, it is more a style that is still used these days.
But Blofeld does isolate the threat. The only thing that prevents Blofeld from eradicating the threat is the happenstance of Bond overhearing the general order to "arrest" and detain Bond.
The last chapter I consider brilliant. The book as a whole is wanting but still enjoyable.
The entire beginning right up to Bond being restrained by Tanner after the assassination attempt is my favourite sequence in the entire series of books.
By whom? I know of no author--particularly of modern vintage--who goes into such exquisite detail describing the human face and physiognomy. Fleming is unparalleled in this area, IMO.
Gun is very derivative--an ill and aging Fleming rushed out one final Bond and had to borrow from his previous work to do so--but still outstrips the best work by the vast majority of thriller writers.