› ›

SPECTRE Production Timeline

1…245246248250251…870

Comments

  • skullkrusherskullkrusher
    Posts: 212
    StoneShi wrote: »
    You may be able to guess - it's an unused Fleming title that was in consideration for QOS.
    Fleming's working title "Death Leaves An Echo" ;-) [img][/img]


  • ColonelSunColonelSun
    Posts: 1,493
    Fleming had many potential titles in his notes which he considered using like "My Enemy's Enemy is my Friend".

    Eon have access to Fleming's story, idea notes etc.

  • StoneShiStoneShi
    Posts: 75
    Bingo got it in a one.

    Gustav Graves... step outside your world... there is more to Fleming than those four titles, as the true fan knows. Perhaps work your domain name magic to confirm for us DLAE... I'm itching to see for myself if what I'm hearing is true.

    Remember: my credentials. I was the first to break Hoytema and Purvis/Wade's return.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    But...but....BUT THAT'S A WUNDERFUL TITLE!!

    Oooowh by jolly, "Death Leaves An Echo". I'm seriously thrilled. One needs to explain me something. How can I know these unused Fleming-titles? Where can I find them?

    Again, a magnificent title....if it's true. But apparently it is :-D!
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    ColonelSun wrote: »
    Fleming had many potential titles in his notes which he considered using like "My Enemy's Enemy is my Friend".

    Eon have access to Fleming's story, idea notes etc.

    Bond 24 is 'Man's Work'.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    Actually, if that's true, I think that's a great title. And fitting.
    Thanks, @StoneShi. Hope it is verified soon. :) Good point about EON's access to Fleming's notes, @ColonelSun.
  • StoneShiStoneShi
    Posts: 75
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    But...but....BUT THAT'S A WUNDERFUL TITLE!!

    Oooowh by jolly, "Death Leaves An Echo". I'm seriously thrilled. One needs to explain me something. How can I know these unused Fleming-titles? Where can I find them?

    Wikipedia... DLAE is one of the few useable ones remaining. The rest are clunkers that he rejected for good reason, like Undertaker's Wind (fart concept) and Man's Work (like a Tim Allen sitcom) or B movie (Infernal Machine). That leaves a few choices. Purvis and Wade have proven they are not up to the task of coining a Bond title.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    Actually, if that's true, I think that's a great title. And fitting.
    Thanks, @StoneShi.

    I wouldn't bank on it.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    edited October 2014 Posts: 12,480
    I'm not, @RC7. :) Waiting for verification of course. I do like it as a title very much, though, and I hope this is true. Definitely a longer title for a Bond film (thinking back now: AVTAK; YOLT; TWINE). So maybe due for longer. I just like the sound of it.

    Re P&W: It is not up to the writers to give the Bond film its title. That is - I think - mainly the producer's decision, although I'm sure they include others in the discussion.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    An announcement tomorrow? Hmm

  • StoneShiStoneShi
    Posts: 75
    RC7 wrote: »
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    Actually, if that's true, I think that's a great title. And fitting.
    Thanks, @StoneShi.

    I wouldn't bank on it.

    Check my track record. And I'll take you up on any bet any time any place.

    You know the name... name the number...
  • JWPepperJWPepper You sit on it, but you can't take it with you.
    Posts: 512
    The Secret Service deleted the production office photo on Twitter. So, it is true; why else would they delete it?

  • StoneShiStoneShi
    Posts: 75
    doubleoego wrote: »
    An announcement tomorrow? Hmm

  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    edited October 2014 Posts: 11,119
    http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbond-deathleavesanecho.com AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbond-deathleavesanecho.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbonddeathleavesanecho.com AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/jamesbonddeathleavesanecho.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-film.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-thefilm.com AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-thefilm.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-themovie.com AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho-themovie.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechofilm.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechomovie.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechothefilm.com AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechothefilm.net AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanechothemovie.com AVAILABLE
    http://www.who.is/whois/deathleavesanecho.com AVAILABLE

    Apparently, all of the above domain names are still available. Where did you find the DLAE-acronym? I couldn't find it on the official @JamesBondLive Twitter-page.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    @StoneShi, I believe it was you who made a big deal about not getting recognition for breaking Hoytema as dp. I respect and appreciate you keeping your sources to yourself but for the love of God, please don't troll our emotions here. I hope you're being sincere.
  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    Thanks for the interpretation of that list, GG. ;)
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    I'm not, @RC7. :) Waiting for verification of course. I do like it as a title very much, though, and I hope this is true.

    Re P&W: It is not up to the writers to give the Bond film its title. That is - I think - mainly the producer's decision, although I'm sure they include others in the discussion.

    Well, it was Wade who came up with the title Skyfall, so it's certainly still possible the genesis of the title lies with Logan or P&W, or as you say B&M. The studio also have a massive say.
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    doubleoego wrote: »
    @StoneShi, I believe it was you who made a big deal about not getting recognition for breaking Hoytema as dp. I respect and appreciate you keeping your sources to yourself but for the love of God, please don't troll our emotions here. I hope you're being sincere.

    There's nothing wrong with emotions. They are always present with these important upcoming news updates about new Bond films. You know I'm an emotional lad as well (It's very damn obvious :-P). Still, I must conclude that "Death Leaves An Echo" hasn't been registered at all yet as domain by Sony/MarkMonitor. The title nowadays is even registered to a band/song.

    Unless @StoneShi comes up with proof of the acronym "DLAE", we can not confirm anything yet....and we need to wait a cruel 24 hours :-O.
  • StoneShiStoneShi
    Posts: 75
    Willa teaser poster help confirm your doubts... ?

    http://i.imgur.com/YV4aqHS.jpg
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    StoneShi wrote: »
    Willa teaser poster help confirm your doubts... ?

    http://i.imgur.com/YV4aqHS.jpg

    Not a penny. What kind of collage is thátt :-O?

  • zebrafishzebrafish <°)))< in Octopussy's garden in the shade
    edited October 2014 Posts: 4,341
    That teaser poster confirmed MY doubts for sure!
  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,138
    StoneShi wrote: »
    Willa teaser poster help confirm your doubts... ?

    http://i.imgur.com/YV4aqHS.jpg

    Oh look, StoneShi is revealing his true self.
    What a surprise.

  • 4EverBonded4EverBonded the Ballrooms of Mars
    Posts: 12,480
    RC7 wrote: »
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    I'm not, @RC7. :) Waiting for verification of course. I do like it as a title very much, though, and I hope this is true.

    Re P&W: It is not up to the writers to give the Bond film its title. That is - I think - mainly the producer's decision, although I'm sure they include others in the discussion.

    Well, it was Wade who came up with the title Skyfall, so it's certainly still possible the genesis of the title lies with Logan or P&W, or as you say B&M. The studio also have a massive say.

    True, titles can be suggested by writers; I'm just saying the decision is not theirs.

  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    StoneShi wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    Actually, if that's true, I think that's a great title. And fitting.
    Thanks, @StoneShi.

    I wouldn't bank on it.

    Check my track record. And I'll take you up on any bet any time any place.

    You know the name... name the number...

    I'm not suggesting you're lying, but I find your troll-like behaviour at odds with someone who's supposedly an insider, or perhaps that's how you remain off the radar. If so, that's quite neat.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    4EverBonded wrote: »
    I'm not, @RC7. :) Waiting for verification of course. I do like it as a title very much, though, and I hope this is true.

    Re P&W: It is not up to the writers to give the Bond film its title. That is - I think - mainly the producer's decision, although I'm sure they include others in the discussion.

    Well, it was Wade who came up with the title Skyfall, so it's certainly still possible the genesis of the title lies with Logan or P&W, or as you say B&M. The studio also have a massive say.

    True, titles can be suggested by writers; I'm just saying the decision is not theirs.

    No, certainly not. I'm not actually sure who has final say, but I would imagine it's up to B&M to pitch to the studio and if the studio isn't sold it doesn't happen. I seem to remember the studio eventually went for QoS because the marketing guy suggested they could work in the 007 logo, ala CR.
  • skullkrusherskullkrusher
    Posts: 212
    Italy shooting expected in February and March 2015 (Lazio and Campania)..

    http://t.co/yhjSW5ahcv
  • Gustav_GravesGustav_Graves
    Posts: 11,119
    I think, when it comes down to creating a new Bond title, the creative team always have the first and final say over it. I don't believe marketeers and Sony are waiting for Michael's and Bab's head to be chopped off when they come up with a title full of, uhmm, "inuendo". Did Pickert and UA/MGM called Cubby back when they decided to use soft porn title "Octopussy"? Nah, don't worry guys, this process is save within all these brainstorm sessions of the creative team (Babs, Michael, Daniel Craig, Sam Mendes and the scriptwriters).
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Gustav_Graves wrote: »
    I think, when it comes down to creating a new Bond title, the creative team always have the first and final say over it. I don't believe marketeers and Sony are waiting for Michael's and Bab's head to be chopped off when they come up with a title full of, uhmm, "inuendo". Did Pickert and UA/MGM called Cubby back when they decided to use soft porn title "Octopussy"? Nah, don't worry guys, this process is save within all these brainstorm sessions of the creative team (Babs, Michael, Daniel Craig, Sam Mendes and the scriptwriters).

    No one is saying the studio create the title, that is down to the creative team, but the studio can veto titles. So what might be the producers first choice, ends up being binned in favour of the studios preferred title.
  • JWPepperJWPepper You sit on it, but you can't take it with you.
    Posts: 512
    Benny wrote: »
    StoneShi wrote: »
    Willa teaser poster help confirm your doubts... ?

    http://i.imgur.com/YV4aqHS.jpg

    Oh look, StoneShi is revealing his true self.
    What a surprise.

    But what about the MI6 twitter-account... Maybe the title will be revealed.

  • BennyBenny Shaken not stirredAdministrator, Moderator
    Posts: 15,138
    The fan art he posted is very similar to an troll from old.
    Seems odd that StoneShi would post such so called 'art'
Sign In or Register to comment.