It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Seriously, name one and I can dig into the trash bin of my memory & pull out the thinking on it. Give me time & I'll come to really appreciate SF... probably after I see SP (I'm expecting it to be fantastic from the stuff I'm seeing on it) I'll have this epiphany that SF was better than I thought.
But no Bonds will ever eclipse Dalton's two for me- it just isn't in the cards.
TLD is one of my favourites. LTK not quite, but still good.
Agreed, Damn close for me too. TLD just gets it because of Barry & the Vienna scenes, but LTK runs it darn close and is so much better towards the end. Two very different experiences but both first class. I think only Connery (FRWL to GF) & Craig (CR to QoS) have delivered this kind of quality in immediate succession with so much difference in tone and feel.
Don't forget Dr No. ;)
Very true, but I was referring to quality with a change of tone as well. Arguably DN is similar in tone to FRWL & the excellent TB is similar in tone to GF. There is a tonal change between FRWL & GF & they are both excellent. Similarly there is a tonal change between CR & QoS (some may disagree that the latter is excellent but I love it) & the two Dalton films.
Still really enjoy LTK, for what it's worth. I just don't rank the two cheek by jowl as most do, which is interesting, as they aren't that similar aside from their leading man.
Glad to see there is still plenty of love for TLD :>
The tone of LTK sits better with Dalton and it's probably the better of the two perfomances, but overall TLD still stands stronger as a film and story.
TLD also contains his best scenes from a 007-purist point of view - Bratislava sniper scene & hotel room with Pushkin.
Well said
An excellent point that I had not noticed before. That is what's great about LTK - there are new things to notice every time one watches it.
And if you care about that sort of thing (I don't particularly, when it comes to the films): His performance in TLD is more "Flemingesque."
Yes, the snippets of SP I'm picking up on all look and sound fantastic. I'm really optimistic. I think though that if it's as good as I'm hoping it will be, then it'll only put SF further into the shade.
LTK-Let Timothy Kill
LTK has some genuine classic moments but it also has some downright embarrassing moments and I'll take all the so called awful moments in SF over having Q in the field.
Although no we accept that because it's old cosy Bond with gadgets and the Bond theme blaring we are in comfortable territory here whether it doesn't make sense within the narrative of the film. Q being in the film just undermined Bond's revenge element and was one of the most blatant crow barred moments of the series.
TLD is undoubtedly of a much more even tone and although feeling like a Moore film retooled works better with the exception of some uncomfortable one liner which poor old Tim just can't sell.
He's a great Bond and definitely bought the Fleming back but his films just didn't take advantage of his portrayal, yes it was grittier but it couldn't let go of the tick the box moments and although they work in TLD when they try to make it work in the context of a revenge story it just jars.
Sorry my rose tinted specs are in the repair shop at the moment.
:)>-