It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
For all we know it could've been a very tumultuous time for her where she made alot of enemies. True the same could probably be said for her run in MI6 but it's probably a matter of the character's history that we don't know much about.
No, it doesn't make any sense to me at all. "You should have trusted me to finish the job." Quite right. How many fights had we seen Craig's Bond win at this point? I get it that M panicked but she says that she trusts him at the end of QoS so what has changed since then?
At least the movies work if watched as stand-alone movies. Even QOS works as it is one roller-coaster action ride and the story (if there is one) is the least important part of it.
Uh the point was that she was willing to risk Bond's life in order to kill Patrice. And she couldn't risk another second that other agents would be compromised. So she was wrong. And sure she didn't trust Bond in that moment but she was under stress and had to make a quick decision between many agents lives or Bonds. So her risks failed. That's all there is to it.
"I'll risk losing you, Bond, because I can see into the future and tell that you'll lose in your fight against Patrice. You've had machete fights with warlords, knife fights against skilled assassins, and you've taken out other MI6 operatives in an enclosed elevator, but I know you won't be able to beat Patrice."
Makes zero sense.
That could be due to Moneypenny's bad description of the situation (making it seem more urgent and critical than it really was). Had M been there to see what was going on, she might have made different judgement. But Eve was making over-exaggerated calls, and M couldn't know how long she had. So yes, that's what ended up happening because maybe M's character can talk the talk (Goldeneye) but can't walk the walk. Hence her "retirement" for bad judgement.
Yesterday I watched again Goldeneye and I have a doubt that maybe has been covered but not sure
Here is my question, did Alec betrayed them because James didn't do anything in the first scene of the film or was it because of the after WWII incident.
In the cementary scene he says its because of the story sukovsy story told Bond on WWII but the scene in the train tells something else.
When Alec ask your friend or the mission he latter says we go back to the beginning or something like that, so it implies we go back to the first scene where didn't rescue Alec in the opening sequence.
I can buy that Magneto was a kid during the war even if the X-Men films are set a decade or so into the future. He is a mutant, but Alec is probably not. A stupid hangover from when 006 was meant to be someone like Anthony Hopkins.
I remember discussing this on this thread a couple of years ago. Technically Trevelyn is 56 years old for the events of Goldeneye. That's one spry looking 56 year old.
If memory serves me correctly, originally Trevelyn was supposed to be Bond's mentor rather than a partner. Which would've made alot more sense. I don't know why they changed their minds.
I can't imagine his father's suicide taking place too much longer after Britain's betrayal. Trevelyn himself says he was 6 years old. Any way you cut it Trevelyn would be in his 50s.
It's a problem I've had with GE in recent years. The script wasn't as well thought out as people say.
yes but also talked about Bond's loyalty to the que queen instead to his friend(him), so could that mean he decided to change sides after Bond didn't save him before the place exploded.
He said in the cementary scene i was thinking to make you Join me in my plan but i knew you were loyal to the queen not your friend.
So that means he used to think James was his friend but that first scene we see before the opening credits changed everything.
Obviously Bond would have never betrayed england since like Alec Pointed out his parents died in a plane accident not murdered by stalling or commiting suicide because of it but he was fond of James till he didn't save him in the mission we see them togeher.
Exactly what I clicked on this thread to find out. Cross this question of my bucket list. Thanks.
He knows where the gun is, why not take it out of the game.
If Sterling Archer can do it if the mission demands it, then James Bond can do it too
:P
If BB suddenly feels she has to please the gay community or thinks she can lure even more people into the cinema by doing such a thing, she undoubtably will.
She already has cast M as a woman, Q as a young hipster, and Moneypenny as a young black woman and made James Bond blond and short. Go figure.
There's really no point in asking a question like this that has been asked many, many times before. It's the same as asking "Should James Bond be black?", and it always ends up one way: argumentative discussions.
I second that notion.
We have already a Transex Bond girl. All though it was not part of the plot. Then there was that Skyfall line "who says it's my 1st time" likely tongue and cheek. But Bond is ruthless in his pursuing if sleeping with a man got him closer to his objectives he would do it.