SPECTRE Production Timeline

1791792794796797870

Comments

  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277

    the link not working

    @EndCredits007 - New link for the PDF of Event Magazine:
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4W-JyTBejG2Q0w5YzExbnBIX1k
  • edited September 2015 Posts: 6,601
    Station_Z wrote: »
    Germanlady wrote: »
    Has there been any confirmation by now, that the main cast will be in Zürich?

    Anybody?

    https://www.facebook.com/JamesBondClubSchweiz/photos/a.398897096833544.90481.129568650433058/989629007760347/?type=3

    Only Naomie Harris and Dave Bautista will attend the Swiss Premiere.

    Thanks a lot, means I am not going to visit my son, but there are better times to be there ;)
  • Posts: 1,068
    1574C0DA-E48D-4317-90D8-C741622D45C3-1981-000003163C046F2D.jpg



    PLOT TWIST!!

    Sam Smith IS Blofeld!

    Turning 007's world upside down and creating irreconcilable divisions among those that care for him:



    2B416A0E-1553-4EF8-890B-0891F331E79F-1981-000003162A8B2A98.jpg
  • I remember when "Who Can You Trust", the title song for "Spy", forummembers easily wrote it of as a 'Bond clone', as something that sounds 'uninspiring' and 'dull'. But how do we look at this song now? After "Writing's On The Wall" premiered?

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited September 2015 Posts: 23,883
    I remember when "Who Can You Trust", the title song for "Spy", forummembers easily wrote it of as a 'Bond clone', as something that sounds 'uninspiring' and 'dull'. But how do we look at this song now? After "Writing's On The Wall" premiered?


    It sounds like a grammy winner now (comparatively speaking) to me, but it is still obvious pastiche, so I'm glad we didn't get something like this for SP. It would have led to negative comparisons to some of the more bombastic great songs of the past....I think that's why EON dumped Surrender to the end credits for TND (because it was too similar to some of the older tracks but inferior and somewhat parodic (at least to my ears). Even though Crowe's song can be criticized, it wasn't all that derivative
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    Surrender sounds like an end credits song ..sure it wasn't written for that purpose?
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Surrender sounds like an end credits song ..sure it wasn't written for that purpose?

    No, I believe Arnold wrote it for the main theme. MGM picked Crowe's track though after a competitive bidding process and Surrender was switched to the end credits. That's why we hear some of the Surrender theme in the score for the film. I'm not sure if politics were involved, but I'm glad they went with Crowe's track, because Surrender is too pastiche even though it sounds Bondian imho.
  • edited September 2015 Posts: 3,164
    The final trailer has now been CONFIRMED to play in U.S. cinemas this week - with Lionsgate's Sicario, and in IMAX with The Walk.

    http://digitalcinema.bydeluxe.com/site/dlxportal/docs/TrailMix_by_Deluxe-_WK_40_US.pdf

    Runs 1:15, online release presumably by Thursday evening.
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    SPECTRE soundtrack cover.

    719UsMyDHmL._SL1417_.jpg
  • Garth007Garth007 Missouri, USA
    Posts: 61
    SPECTRE soundtrack cover.

    719UsMyDHmL._SL1417_.jpg
    Find it very interesting they keep using this poster a lot for the promotional. Honestly think in my opinion they could use something better to represent the film better artistically

  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    bondjames wrote: »
    mcdonbb wrote: »
    Surrender sounds like an end credits song ..sure it wasn't written for that purpose?

    No, I believe Arnold wrote it for the main theme. MGM picked Crowe's track though after a competitive bidding process and Surrender was switched to the end credits. That's why we hear some of the Surrender theme in the score for the film. I'm not sure if politics were involved, but I'm glad they went with Crowe's track, because Surrender is too pastiche even though it sounds Bondian imho.

    I agree ..but just doesn't sound like a main title to me.

  • Posts: 12,526
    MarcFC15 wrote: »
    Why wasn't this image used as a poster? Love it

    CPriFfbW8AAns1k.jpg

    Love the cover, it certainly reminds me of my user name in terms of the game with the one eye highlighted! :-bd Certainly purchasing this asap!!!
    ggl007 wrote: »
    Odeon:

    CP_6Y9lWEAACsyA.jpg

    Boy do i wish this was in my local cinema!!! :x
    SPECTRE soundtrack cover.

    719UsMyDHmL._SL1417_.jpg

    Cool, although i would have loved a Day of the Dead cover like the special edition Empire mag!
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    Agree about the CD cover @RogueAgent... Might be tempted to make my own CD insert up for when I get this :)
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    It's pretty obvious based on the trailer.. "You're protecting someone.."
    Boom Madeline swan appears..

    Anyways watched a skyfall interview and the interviewer said "so you have two movies left after this one, what's next?" I posted this awhile back and everyone hounded me saying I should be banned for spoiling people...

    This is the production blog. If you don't want to be spoiled by information that has ALREADY been released then don't come on here. Simple enough.
    It's so annoying when people get mad about officially released information.

    Rant over lol
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited September 2015 Posts: 10,591
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.

    You are aware that there are a good number of people on this very forum who are purposely avoiding official material, including the theatrical trailer and the recent synopsis, aren't you? People visit this thread to keep up to date with news and interesting tidbits about a forthcoming Bond movie. It's common courtesy to put major spoilers such as that in spoiler tags, regardless of whether or not it's been released officially.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    jake24 wrote: »
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.

    You are aware that there are a good number of people on this very forum who are purposely avoiding official material, including the theatrical trailer and the recent synopsis, aren't you? People visit this thread to keep up to date with news and interesting tidbits about a forthcoming Bond movie. It's common courtesy to put major spoilers such as that in spoiler tags, regardless of whether or not it's been released officially.

    In the 10 years that I have been here there have never been any issues in the production thread...

    All I am saying is the bickering and arguments get really old.

    If you don't want to see tv spots and trailers then that's completely fine.
    I am not saying don't put spoilers in spoiler tags but when we get hounded for mentioning info in the trailer and people flip because it "spoiled it" that's just so annoying.

    Those people need to be considerate of the 90% who actually watch the trailers.. Just saying.

    There is a much higher percentage of people in this thread who view the trailers and production blogs.

    The people who don't want to watch that is a very small number.

    I would advise caution to coming into this thread, you will see interviews, clips, production blogs, pictures/stills, posters;etc all that can be viewed as spoilerfic to some. To come in here complaining because of someone using actual spoilers is one thing, to complain about a comment based on the trailer that's another....

    I would suggest a non-spoiler production thread but I don't see how that can really be policed. Not everyone will be happy ..


  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.

    That isn't what you originally claimed was obvious. I'm not going to go into it further to avoid reiterating previous information that spoiled plot information for some.

    Your post was flagged for resorting to ad hominim/personal attacks.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.

    That isn't what you originally claimed was obvious. I'm not going to go into it further to avoid reiterating previous information that spoiled plot information for some.

    Your post was flagged for resorting to ad hominim/personal attacks.

    I am not personally attacking anyone?

    "It's pretty obvious based on the trailer.. "You're protecting someone.."
    Boom Madeline swan appears.."

    That is different from my other post where I said she was the one being protected? They are the same thing.

    Let's please get back on topic!
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    edited September 2015 Posts: 7,551
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.

    That isn't what you originally claimed was obvious. I'm not going to go into it further to avoid reiterating previous information that spoiled plot information for some.

    Your post was flagged for resorting to ad hominim/personal attacks.

    I am not personally attacking anyone?

    "It's pretty obvious based on the trailer.. "You're protecting someone.."
    Boom Madeline swan appears.."

    That is different from my other post where I said she was the one being protected? They are the same thing.

    Let's please get back on topic!

    You called me stupid and/or 12. Check your PMs.
  • CASINOROYALECASINOROYALE Somewhere hot
    Posts: 1,003
    Yeah, @CASINOROYALE, that first thing in your post isn't obvious in any way whatsoever.

    You must be 12 or stupid haha...

    How is that not obvious ?
    It was fairly obvious the "you're protecting someone" and then we instantly have bond and Madeline confronting each other and she has been kidnapped by hinx..

    How is it not obvious that she is the person being protected ??

    Why would they just randomly show a random girl then? There's no point in the mr white scene and THAT line and then immediately showing her.
    It's completely obvious.

    That isn't what you originally claimed was obvious. I'm not going to go into it further to avoid reiterating previous information that spoiled plot information for some.

    Your post was flagged for resorting to ad hominim/personal attacks.

    I am not personally attacking anyone?

    "It's pretty obvious based on the trailer.. "You're protecting someone.."
    Boom Madeline swan appears.."

    That is different from my other post where I said she was the one being protected? They are the same thing.

    Let's please get back on topic!

    You called me stupid and/or 12. Check your PMs.


    The fact that you immediately reported me to a mod shows how immature you are. I am frustrated that I come to the production thread and every single time I see people complaining about being spoiled when in fact it is just common knowledge or officially released information. I will inform a mod of what is going on.
  • Posts: 15,124
    antovolk wrote: »
    leas_mole wrote: »
    Yes please, just read something I knew nothing about. :(
    Sorry! But that information has beenon the official 007 page for months now.... have put in spoilers

    Exactly - it's in the new official synopsis for the film.

    It's a challenging time to be sure. I'm trying to avoid any and all plot information whatsoever until the film is released (haven't watched any teasers or trailers, certainly haven't read any leaks). My philosophy on the matter is this:

    I read something accidentally that has been officially released by EON in some capacity (leas_mole's totally legitimate post, in this case) - Shame on Me.

    I read something pertaining to the leaks posted by someone who's read them, and posted where they shouldn't be posting the information - Shame on Them.

    That's a good philosophy.
  • edited September 2015 Posts: 1,220
    antovolk wrote: »
    leas_mole wrote: »
    Yes please, just read something I knew nothing about. :(
    Sorry! But that information has beenon the official 007 page for months now.... have put in spoilers

    Exactly - it's in the new official synopsis for the film.

    It's a challenging time to be sure. I'm trying to avoid any and all plot information whatsoever until the film is released (haven't watched any teasers or trailers, certainly haven't read any leaks). My philosophy on the matter is this:

    I read something accidentally that has been officially released by EON in some capacity (leas_mole's totally legitimate post, in this case) - Shame on Me.

    I read something pertaining to the leaks posted by someone who's read them, and posted where they shouldn't be posting the information - Shame on Them.

    I agree, I understand that there have been issues regarding people posting leaked information, but people need to realize (particularly at this stage in the game) that it's going to be tough sledding if you're extremely spoiler sensitive and if you're going to be active on the Spectre forums, then you should expect that you're going to glean information about a plot point or two, even ones such as this one which was made public by the official synopsis. Those who want to go in completely blind should really consider staying out of the Spectre threads, at least for the time being.
  • NickTwentyTwoNickTwentyTwo Vancouver, BC, Canada
    Posts: 7,551
    Absolutely, @battleshipgreygt
  • People that dont want to know anything about spectre, i can't imagine why they look on the spectre thread!
  • EndCredit007EndCredit007 EGYPT
    Posts: 114

    the link not working

    @EndCredits007 - New link for the PDF of Event Magazine:
    https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B4W-JyTBejG2Q0w5YzExbnBIX1k

    thx a billion
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    vasilismf wrote: »
    People that dont want to know anything about spectre, i can't imagine why they look on the spectre thread!

    Yup ..like trying not to see coffee in a Starbucks.
    ~O) ~O) :-h ~O)
  • SPECTRE soundtrack cover.

    719UsMyDHmL._SL1417_.jpg

    No tracklist yet?
  • MarcFC15MarcFC15 London
    Posts: 24
    Garth007 wrote: »
    SPECTRE soundtrack cover.

    719UsMyDHmL._SL1417_.jpg
    Find it very interesting they keep using this poster a lot for the promotional. Honestly think in my opinion they could use something better to represent the film better artistically

    Agree, it's just saying 'look he's wearing the same tux as Connery in Goldfinger and there's a voodoo looking guy in the background reminiscent of Live and Let Die, though there's nothing in the film like that' I want an old school Bond poster

Sign In or Register to comment.