It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
None at all. In fact, I'd love it.
And as Shark, I have no objection of walking shirtless for entertainment of women. But the women of this world should do the same... especially the Bond girls who should be models for women on how to be sexy, glamorous and shine like a million sun, and for the males on this earth to salivate while watching Bond films.
wheras these days we only have M. I don't know, at least in yesteryear you got some variation.
Anyway, I agree with all of those who like hits 'n tips, if you know what I mean.
*hips*
Have you ever salivated when a woman walked past? If so, what happened next?
LOL.
It was some of the most clumsy, obvious, smug, self-conscious, overly-written dialogue I've ever seen. Came off like a bad stage play, or those bleeding Nescafe ads from the 80s.
I don't salivate to any woman that walks past me on the street. Because none of them are worth my attention. No hips, no arse, no tits, no lips... When women will be women again, then maybe some of them will grab my attention when one walks by. So that's why Bond girls should act and be like women, the sexiest women on earth, so that the women and girls on this earth will also be women again. This overly-feminist society is taking all the women out of this world... So I hope these women will return one day... Walking down the street is boring nowadays... Almost no woman to look at now...
That, it has to be said, is the height of arrogance.
<img src="http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_7bBBHc3rBrY/SbRpHQfL9eI/AAAAAAAAApw/NpnVXiDWJNc/s400/Original-1959-Barbie.doll.JPG">;
If none of the women who walk past you on the street are worth your attention, then it stands to reason that you do not talk or interact with them. And if you do not talk or interact with them, then it stands to reason that you do not know how real women act. And if you do not know how real women act, then it stands to reason that you are in no position to judge the way Bond Girls should act.
What I am saying that in the street, no women will shine more than others, none of them will grab your attention...
Well, actually......
I direct your attention to this sentence:
I say it's time for the Bond girls to act like women again, to show their beauty, to be sexy and glamourous, to please the male audience.
Now, follow the dots:
1) You say Bond Girls should act like women.
2) You say women should show their beauty.
3) You say women should be sexy and glamourous.
And here's the kicker:
4) Your post suggests that women who show the beauty and who are sexy and glamourous, please male audiences.
Therefore, since these four points logically flow into one another, you are effectively saying that women should please men; that the definition of being a woman is pleasing a man.
What other meaning is there in this? Your post suggests that you are incredibly sexist, and your denial implies that you seem to think that this kind of behaviour is somehow acceptable.
If you are not sexist, perhaps you could re-word your post in such a way that it does not suggest sexism on your part.
Corrected.
Bond films are traditionally unpretentious mentertainment, and it should remain that way.
But a Bond film can include women in it without resorting to having them prancing around in bikinis simply for men to ogle at. DC seem to think that this is the only thing that they should be doing, and implies that Bond films set the standards that society follows - ie that women stopped "showing some flesh" when Bond Girls stopped doing it - rather than Bond films being the ones to respond to society.
If you don't accept that, you'll have to just stop watching the series. It's not going to go counterclockwise.
I Agree. Wardrobe tried with Vesper but failed because she was too self-conscience. A truly glamorous woman carries it off without looking like a scared little puppy. Vesper had to work too hard at it. She looked more like she was wearing costumes. The clothes wore her and not the other way around.
As a woman who loves fashion, don’t even get me started on Strawberry Fields showing up at the airport in those atrocious boots and coat getup. There are other ways of portraying naivety without looking that plain and sad.
The 60s Bond girls had lots of curves too.
I think DC007 clearly states Bond girls in that statement and not all women.
DC007, Gemma is gorgeous sooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo hot here's two reasons:
http://celebslam.celebuzz.com/2011/12/gemma-arterton-red-dress.php
I did like Vesper and I would never kick her out of bed. she was hot.
Camille did absolutely nothing for me and as for the Skyfall girls, I would sic my dog on them....(reserve them a seat at the nearest steak house)
As for Craig doing all the best beach scenes in CR, does it have something to do with the fact that the lead producer (Babs) is a woman and she is not so keen on throwing eye candy for us warm blooded males.