SPECTRE Production Timeline

1836837839841842870

Comments

  • Posts: 1,970
    To all those in the UK going to midnight premieres tonight have fun and as Kmal Khan would say "enjoy yourselves". But try not to spoil anything in here because us people back in the states and the rest of the world still have 2 more weeks to go.

    It's been a great year long journey talking with all you and watching the making of this film unfold. Can't believe this movie is finally here .
  • Posts: 270
    new interview

  • edited October 2015 Posts: 1,021
    I hate film "journalists" who don't do their research. She even thinks this year is the 50th anniversary..
  • Posts: 3,164
    fjdinardo wrote: »
    To all those in the UK going to midnight premieres tonight have fun and as Kmal Khan would say "enjoy yourselves". But try not to spoil anything in here because us people back in the states and the rest of the world still have 2 more weeks to go.

    It's been a great year long journey talking with all you and watching the making of this film unfold. Can't believe this movie is finally here .

    UK release is Monday 7:30pm not midnight tonight
  • Posts: 270
    Looks like there was a photocall in London today. Hope the full res pics come soon! http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/mn/20151022/james_bond_spectre_photocall_221015_main/james-bond-spectre-photocall_4989108.jpg
  • tqbtqb
    Posts: 1,022
    hthomas20 wrote: »
    new interview

    That interview became cringe worthy fast. The daniel craig pout? wtf
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    tqb wrote: »
    hthomas20 wrote: »
    new interview

    That interview became cringe worthy fast. The daniel craig pout? wtf

    Yes I got embarrassed for her BUT Craig was very nice in the interview.
  • Posts: 11,119
    hthomas20 wrote: »
    Looks like there was a photocall in London today. Hope the full res pics come soon! http://www.contactmusic.com/pics/mn/20151022/james_bond_spectre_photocall_221015_main/james-bond-spectre-photocall_4989108.jpg

    james-bond-spectre-photocall_4989140.jpg
    james-bond-spectre-photocall_4989113.jpg
    james-bond-spectre-photocall_4989097.jpg
    james-bond-spectre-photocall_4989111.jpg

    I have to say that.......Monica Bellucci looks a lot like Fatima Blush from NSNA. Especially in those lovely 1980's clothes :D:
    398d333af42745aad4b87f2444dceb14.jpg
  • DCisaredDCisared Liverpool
    edited October 2015 Posts: 1,329
    I hope he told her to off ha ha

    Mod edit: F-bomb removed.
  • edited October 2015 Posts: 2,599
    Everything the critics have said is exactly what I expected, including this unfortunately:

    "...and thrifty when it comes to character development. The Bond Girls in particular get short-changed - Seydoux is a thumbnail sketch, while Monica Bellucci's grieving widow is so throwaway you wonder why she even said yes
    to the part."


    Read more: http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/review/a674869/spectre-review-daniel-craig-embraces-bonds-classic-formula-but-it-doesnt-packely-skyfalls-emotional-punch.html#ixzz3pJH7878e
    Follow us: @digitalspy on Twitter | digitalspyuk on Facebook

    Oh well, I'm sure it'll be an entertaining film but there's a good chance that I will feel like I've been short changed somewhat. One wonders why they wanted Smith to record a romance song when it's all so brief in the film anyway. I bet that I will think that Craig is too comedic too. Anymore than what was in Casino Royale is too much. Everything else looks good but it seems like my overall memory of the film will be somewhat tainted by the usual fleeting character driven scenes in Bond films, with the exception of the great OHMSS, CR and Skyfall. They did Tracey, Vesper and M justice but disappointingly not this time around. SPECTRE sounds like a classic Bond film but sadly not one that dears to be a little different in the way of character movement.

    "As the second half unfolds, the absence of an emotional core becomes ever more glaring, hopping from one action beat to the next without ever asking us to care – or, at times, understand – what’s going on. "

    Just one action scene after another. I might have guessed. Can't say I'm surprised but I still feel disappointed.

  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,402
    RC7 wrote: »
    Metacritic has it at 70, RT at 7.2



    I know it's early to tell.

    Anyway, I'm glad the reviews are mostly good. Nowhere near the euphoria in 2012 though.

    And many saying SP is not as good as SF leaves me worried :)) (a tiny bit) :))

    Let's be honest, where a lot of people were waiting to love SF, a lot were waiting to hate SP. There's a video, which I now can't find, of four blokes doing a quick review outside the Odeon. The guy in the middle is basically gagging to say how he doesn't like it, not with a look of disappointment, but a look of restrained glee. There are too many people like that these days, even Bond fans. It's laughable. If I were to not like a film my overriding emotion would be disappointment. Some people just revel in baselessly knocking things.

    Well put @RC7, I saw that video and that guy was so annoying. He was grinning the whole time and kept chipping in with negative stuff like 'last one for Craig!' He obviously had no deep love for the films. What a b%%$end ~X(
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Bounine wrote: »
    Everything the critics have said is exactly what I expected, including this unfortunately:

    "...and thrifty when it comes to character development. The Bond Girls in particular get short-changed - Seydoux is a thumbnail sketch, while Monica Bellucci's grieving widow is so throwaway you wonder why she even said yes
    to the part."


    Read more: http://www.digitalspy.com/movies/review/a674869/spectre-review-daniel-craig-embraces-bonds-classic-formula-but-it-doesnt-packely-skyfalls-emotional-punch.html#ixzz3pJH7878e
    Follow us: @digitalspy on Twitter | digitalspyuk on Facebook

    Oh well, I'm sure it'll be an entertaining film but there's a good chance that I will feel like I've been short changed somewhat. One wonders why they wanted Smith to record a romance song when it's all so brief in the film anyway. I bet that I will think that Craig is too comedic too. Anymore than what was in Casino Royale is too much. Everything else looks good but it seems like my overall memory of the film will be somewhat tainted by the usual fleeting character driven scenes in Bond films, with the exception of the great OHMSS, CR and Skyfall. They did Tracey, Vesper and M justice but disappointingly not this time around. SPECTRE sounds like a classic Bond film but sadly not one that dears to be a little different in the way of character movement.

    I don't see the logic in what you're doing here. Surely a better way to approach this would be to go and see the film and make an assessment then, rather than preemptively assuming how you'll feel. Your talking about your 'memory of this film', having not even seen it.
  • Posts: 3,276
  • MarcFC15MarcFC15 London
    Posts: 24
    hthomas20 wrote: »
    new interview


    That was painful to watch for so many reasons.

  • MarcFC15MarcFC15 London
    Posts: 24
    tqb wrote: »
    hthomas20 wrote: »
    new interview

    That interview became cringe worthy fast. The daniel craig pout? wtf

    Agreed, embarrassingly so and painful to watch in parts. DC does pout though, look at every poster for SPECTRE as an example.

  • Posts: 203
    Wow, that was bad! no wonder bond actor's don't want to do this for long. she was treating him like a chimp? WTF?
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,402
    MarcFC15 wrote: »
    tqb wrote: »
    hthomas20 wrote: »
    new interview

    That interview became cringe worthy fast. The daniel craig pout? wtf

    Agreed, embarrassingly so and painful to watch in parts. DC does pout though, look at every poster for SPECTRE as an example.

    This is what happens when interviewers start acting like the people they're interviewing are there to do whatever they ask of them, else they'll be a poor sport. She had no idea what she was asking was simply inappropriate.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited October 2015 Posts: 8,402
    RC7 wrote: »
    Metacritic has it at 70, RT at 7.2



    I know it's early to tell.

    Anyway, I'm glad the reviews are mostly good. Nowhere near the euphoria in 2012 though.

    And many saying SP is not as good as SF leaves me worried :)) (a tiny bit) :))

    Let's be honest, where a lot of people were waiting to love SF, a lot were waiting to hate SP. There's a video, which I now can't find, of four blokes doing a quick review outside the Odeon. The guy in the middle is basically gagging to say how he doesn't like it, not with a look of disappointment, but a look of restrained glee. There are too many people like that these days, even Bond fans. It's laughable. If I were to not like a film my overriding emotion would be disappointment. Some people just revel in baselessly knocking things.



    @RC7 The guy with the glasses, I think you mean. I cannot stand when people behave like that. It's almost being smug that a film didn't impress you. It's how people act when they think they understand how a magic trick is done. :-w
  • Posts: 15,125
    Not reading anything right now. Will leave these here forums until the 26, when I see the movie. I don't want to get any spoiler and there has been a pre-release, so see you then.
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    edited October 2015 Posts: 2,540
    c9eubzB.png
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,540
    SPECTRE's Dave Bautista: 'Daniel Craig punched me'

    Even though Dave seems like a genuinely top bloke, you'd still shit yourself a bit if you clocked him on the beak.
  • skropper13skropper13 United States
    Posts: 117
    RC7 wrote: »
    Metacritic has it at 70, RT at 7.2



    I know it's early to tell.

    Anyway, I'm glad the reviews are mostly good. Nowhere near the euphoria in 2012 though.

    And many saying SP is not as good as SF leaves me worried :)) (a tiny bit) :))

    Let's be honest, where a lot of people were waiting to love SF, a lot were waiting to hate SP. There's a video, which I now can't find, of four blokes doing a quick review outside the Odeon. The guy in the middle is basically gagging to say how he doesn't like it, not with a look of disappointment, but a look of restrained glee. There are too many people like that these days, even Bond fans. It's laughable. If I were to not like a film my overriding emotion would be disappointment. Some people just revel in baselessly knocking things.


    Never was there a truer statement... Most people these days think they are an established movie critic. Just enjoy the movie. If you're a bond fan it sounds like this movie will follow up skyfall great. Especially if you wanted a little more "classic" bond. The biggest gripes I've seen: the legnth... Okay so more bond? Fine with me. A little less than developed madeline swann? Okay I definitely did not want another vesper or ohmss love story...
  • Posts: 270
    all kinds of interviews now being uploaded -
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,139
    Oh snap! That train fight!
    =P~
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    I could not have imagined something better than what I just saw of the train fight. Absolutely impeccable.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    doubleoego wrote: »
    Oh snap! That train fight!
    =P~

    Looks really good
Sign In or Register to comment.