It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Connery was Bond, and him together with the director Terance Young created the cinematic Bond character.
This may be where the problem lies imho. You think Brosnan is the best, objectively, by far? Really? Objectively?
Here's my take (and it's just my opinion - there's no objectivity here):
Connery is the best not because he was the first (although he was).... He's not the best because he was cool (although he was the coolest imho).
He's the best because nobody did it so effortlessly (including Craig, at least up to SP which I've yet to watch). Connery embodied what he portrayed. He didn't look like he was trying. It felt real.
Of all the actors, he was the most believable ladies man imho. The one who you felt could make them swoon. He was also the most believable killer (so is Craig however).
I found early Connery (in particular Terence Young's Connery) to be witty, suave, sophisticated, cold, menacing, enigmatic, confident, sexy, experienced, butch etc. etc. He is the only actor who captured nearly all your attributes above. All the others split these attributes and brought some of them to the table, but no one captured it all like early Terence Young Connery.
The only attribute that he perhaps did not project was vulnerability, but that was most likely by conscious design. Neither did Moore. Heroes were not asked to do this in those days. Lazenby was different because they stayed true to the book.
I think one only needs to look at the 'Bond, James Bond' introductions of all the actors to determine who is #1. Most would agree that Connery's DN intro is the gold standard. Not strained. Not affected. Just real. To this day it hasn't been equaled (yes, I'm including Craig's cool but still inferior & overstylized intro at the end of CR). He's also the only Bond actor with an Oscar on his trophy wall.
Connery has everything you listed above. To me, Dalton is easily the worst. Lazenby next and both because of acting.
My next guess is the author of this thread simply posted it to see his name.
You're not worth the trouble ...enjoy your thread.
That said I've never once ranked him as my favourite. As a youngster when it was Connery or Moore I favoured the latter. Then when I became a fully fledged fan, reading the books and collecting the films Dalton arrived on the scene and won instant favour. At times I've also really rated Lazenby as you can easily picture him when reading the novels.
Craig is a fine Bond too but my current 2nd place due to nostalgia for Tim's era.
So yes Connery is a great Bond but often played the bridesmaid in my own rankings!
I object. That is too far.
2. Craig
3. Moore
4. Dalton
5. Lazenby
6. Brosnan
Well, that was easy.
They all have their merits, and all have their weaknesses. Most people just reckon Connery has the most of the former and the least of the latter.
http://www.mi6community.com/index.php?p=/discussion/143/rank-the-actors#latest