Home › Bond Movies › Skyfall
Reporting For Duty
It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Quick Links
Categories
Daniel Craig Time Out Interview on Skyfall and Quantum
The Bond bits
You’re about to start shooting the new Bond film. How do you feel about it? Is there a sense of ‘Hell, here we go for the next seven months…’ just because it’s such a massive undertaking?
‘Yes, there’s definitely some of that, but I’m genuinely really excited because we’ve got a script. The deciding factor for doing “Casino Royale”, even though I was umming and aahhing, going [puts on moody voice] “I don’t know if I want to do it”, was that they showed me the script and I thought: ****, I’ve got to do this. And I think this one is better. I really do. It’s a totally original story. I read it and it just works as a story. It sounds like a simplistic thing to say, but you read it and you go: “Oh yeah, I get that, yeah, and oh, yes, yes, okay,” and that’s unusual.’
It seems that the script is sometimes an after-thought on huge productions.
‘Yes and you swear that you’ll never get involved with shit like that, and it happens. On “Quantum”, we were ****. We had the bare bones of a script and then there was a writers’ strike and there was nothing we could do. We couldn’t employ a writer to finish it. I say to myself, “Never again”, but who knows? There was me trying to rewrite scenes – and a writer I am not.’
You had to rewrite scenes yourself?
‘Me and the director [Marc Forster] were the ones allowed to do it. The rules were that you couldn’t employ anyone as a writer, but the actor and director could work on scenes together. We were stuffed. We got away with it, but only just. It was never meant to be as much of a sequel as it was, but it ended up being a sequel, starting where the last one finished.’
It was still a massive commercial success though. So it wasn’t a failure in that sense.
‘No, quite. Thank God it worked, and it worked like gangbusters. But for me personally, on a level of feeling satisfied, I would want to do better next time. That’s really important to me.’
To give a better performance?
‘No, the whole film. If you’re going to do that sort of stuff, you’ve just got to get it right. You’ve got to give it your best shot. When you’ve got all that talent, everyone gunning to make it good, you’ve got to get it… For **** sake, it’s a Bond movie. You want people to go, “Whooah!” – a sharp intake of breath during a movie is never a bad thing.’
Did you have anything to do with getting Sam Mendes on board as director?
‘I did, yes, I did. He’s English, he’s Cambridge-educated, he’s smart. He’s lived with Bond all his life, he grew up with Bond the way I did. We grew up at exactly the same time, and I said to him, “We have to do this together, we have exactly the same reference points, we both like the same Bond movies and we both like the same bits in the same Bond movies we like.” We sat down and we just rabbited for hours about “Live and Let Die” or “From Russia with Love”, and talked about little scenes that we knew from them. That’s how we started talking about it. That’s what we tried to instill in the script. He’s been working his arse off to tie all these things together so they make sense – in a Bond way.’
I love that Sam Mendes’s last film was ‘Away We Go’ – his most indie film yet.
‘Yes, that’s true, and now he’s making a $200m Bond movie. He’s an OCD control freak and I mean that in the nicest possible way, as all directors are. David Fincher included. They are all absolutely single-minded and all they want to do is get it right. On a movie like this, you need that – maybe I shouldn’t call him an “OCD control freak”: it’s a joke, but you need someone with lots of different heads – there’s a producing head, a directing head, a special-effects head, a publicity head. More than any other movie, you need someone with all that going on, and he just does, he’s a manager, a great manager, and one of the skills doing a Bond movie is about is managing a lot of people, saying, “Okay, do that, that’s got to be done, and I’ll do that.” It’s a tricky **** job to do.’
It sounds like you’ve become even more involved behind the scenes as time has gone on.
‘I said from the very beginning to Barbara [Broccoli] and Michael [Wilson, the producers and guardians of the Bond franchise]: “If you give me this responsibility, I can just walk on that set and pretend to be James Bond,” but they allowed me to be involved more. It’s naturally progressed. I don’t want to get in people’s way, I just want to encourage things along. Sam got involved and then we got Roger Deakins [the director of photography], for **** sake, who’s shooting it. The air is rare, and we’ve had the chance to employ some brilliant people. Win or lose, we’ve done the best we can because we’ve put the right people in the job. Pool the best talent you can, give them a good time and do the best we can – now I sound like a **** politician!’
Did you worry about becoming public property – tabloid fodder – when you took on Bond?
‘Yes, in some respects it’s unavoidable, you can’t deny it. In some respects, I still fight with it now. I can’t go to war with paparazzi. The Daily Mail loves saying – [putting whiny voice on] “He never smiles” – yeah, because I know you’re **** taking pictures of me, that’s why. Because the Daily Mail comes to mind every time I see a camera. I challenge anybody to **** smile. I’m just not that person.
‘But I do get it, you can’t just come out and be angry. There’s no **** point. You’ve got to live your life. I know I’m not that person. I’m never going to arrive at an airport after a 12-hour flight and go, “Oh, hi everyone, it’s so great to see you!” I can’t do it. You’ve got to live your life, you’ve got to enjoy it. And this is a great time, I’m playing James Bond. That’s what makes me secure about it, I’m having a lot of fun with it and getting a kick out of it, and people have a perception that I’m grumpy all the time.’
I remember when they announced you as Bond they had you speeding down the Thames on a boat. You obviously decided to swallow your worries about exposure to the press for that…
‘They wanted to fly me in on a Harrier jump jet! I remember thinking: “Okay, in for a penny…” But the safety regulations stopped that idea. The irony was, I got down to the river, to the military speedboat, and there was this marine giving me a lifejacket. And I was like, “Do I have to wear a life jacket?”, and he was like, “Yeah, you’re not getting on this boat without one.” But what about my suit!
‘It was a strange transition that time. I had no idea what was going on. Who could I ask? “Hey, Pierce [Brosnan], what’s it like?” I did do that. And he was just: “You’ve got to go for it.” There’s nothing that he could say that could be of any use whatsoever.’
As Bond, you’re virtually a pin-up, aren’t you?
‘The iconography of it is really important. I’ve just spent three or four months on and off with Tom Ford, trying suits on, over and over. It’s important. It just is. Whichever is the first suit I come out in, it has to have the reaction, “Oh, **** hell, that’s a suit.” You have to have an eye on that and the look and feel of things. I’m in the gym every day, that’s the truth, I have to be there. I have to start doing it ten weeks off from filming, otherwise it doesn’t work.’
And, as Bond, you have to whip off your top at some point. So vanity surely comes into play?
‘To answer your question – yes!’
http://www.timeout.com/london/feature/2002/daniel-craig-exclusive-interview
credit: DTD
Mod Edit: I know you didn't write the article, but at least edit out the swear words, before you post it.
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
You should post it here though, to keep them all in one place.
Done..
Love the cover photo too! I would love for that shot (sans glasses) in the film--but we all know EON won't portray smoking in Bond anymore...but let's not get into that! Is Craig going for a Fleming pose there?
Well, with this sort of friendly reminder, its a pleasure to provide info on here.
I particularly like the "at least", which sounds like "IF by all means, you have to post something, then at least do***.
Nice...
Craig isn't Dalton. Connery swears quite a bit as well.
I acknowledge that the writers strike damaged the film, but then they should of stopped and waited, and done it properly. they should never have shot a single frame until the script was perfect. For this I will never forgive Marc.
having said all this, I do hope that SkyFall is very successful and continues to power Bond into the 21st century. Its got a lot of competition from MI4 and Batman and Bourne. Long live British cinema!
With regards to other films being released? There is nothing to fear, Bond has seen them all off to be honest! 50 years of the franchise is evidence of that.
With Sir Rog you always get one-liners, with Conners and Lazers (often entertaining) angst, with Timbo insight and with the Brozzer (when he was Bond at least) on-message bigging up of the series and role. With Craig, though, you get honesty - which in this media-dominated and media-obsessed age is refreshing, indeed.
And @aclarke11, I wouldn't be a bit surprised if Quantum came back - maybe in Bond 24? Actually, I wouldn't be surprised if Mendes and co. are shooting us a bit of a lie and it plays some sort of a role in SF - they're certainly keeping a lot close to their collective chest when it comes to the story and characters. After all, they haven't categorically said Qunatum <i>won't</i> be in SF at all... ;)
So says the man who seems not to approve of Craig's Bond? In the words of Sir Rog, interesting... :P
And Cavill, what could have been. :(
Given Eon's penchant for re-considering and/ or re-auditioning actors each time the role's up for grabs (Sir Rog, Timbo, James Purefoy et al), methinks Cavill may well have another chance - unless he (ahem) takes off as Superman, that is.
But surely he was - and most certainly looked - too young for 007 seven years ago, didn't he...? :-?
I'm wondering, is this really necessary?
Don't get me wrong, I like it. I workout in the gym regularly, some people say I'm a fitness freak.
We all know James Bond has to be fit, all the previous ones were, but none of them had so much muscles.
Did the producers demand of him to be buffed and ripped?
Some kind of contract obligation, maybe?
I think it is great and it should be his routine for every film. If he went for 5 flicks and did this before each one, he would break the Brosnan/Connery mold of getting rounder and rounder (hell, Tobey did it with Spider-man as well). He should stay in top shape.
But as for Cavill, he's 28 now, so in my book, his window has opened for mature Bond, but it won't stay open for long. Mind you, Eon, given their penchant, will probably grab him when he's 40. #-o
Interesting side note. Connery was 31 when he shot DN. Early on in the film, he indicates that he's been on the job with the Beretta for 10 years.
And if the Charlie Higson, Young Bond stories are to believed, Bond would have been a danger agent in his early 20's. Even Fleming had Bond doing spy work as a 20-something during the war. I think the ideal Bond age as envisioned by Fleming was roughly 30-45 and then mandatory retirement. And even at 30 Bond was seasoned.