No Time To Die: Production Diary

1144014411443144514462507

Comments

  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 41,113
    jake24 wrote: »
    You really don't have any more knowledge than the rest of us.

    This. Just like Radiohead was doing the SP theme song, only for it not to happen.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883

    Fair enough, however QOS didn’t really have a script and while there is a case to be made that the film isn’t good, the acting can’t be faulted
    That's a fair point. A very good observation in fact.

    Craig carried QoS and energized it. He didn't show up for SP. Perhaps that just dragged everyone else down because he, as Bond, is in nearly every scene.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,997
    From past experience, I think a four year production seems to work best. That gap between QoS and Skyfall seemed to do the film the world of good, obviously the Olympics helped but still. So with the same time now between Spectre and Bond 25, my hope is restored.
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    I think how long the gaps are is irrelevant to the quality.
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Denbigh wrote: »
    From past experience, I think a four year production seems to work best. That gap between QoS and Skyfall seemed to do the film the world of good, obviously the Olympics helped but still. So with the same time now between Spectre and Bond 25, my hope is restored.
    Anecdotally yes, but they only started on this Boyle script recently to my knowledge. So really, if they had their ducks in order, they could have shaved two years off this wait. It's not like it's going to be any less rushed at the end of the day. The SF delay was forced on them to a degree by MGM's woes as I recall. They sort of had Mendes's idea locked quite early.
    I think how long the gaps are is irrelevant to the quality.
    I tend to agree.
  • edited April 2018 Posts: 4,619
    Getafix wrote: »

    we thought that with SP as well until they were brought back. I wouldn't be surprised if they are asked to do some fiddling with the script
    EON will DEFINITELY ask them to do some fiddling with the script, then Boyle will say: "It's either 100% John Hodge, or I'm out." To which EON will say on their knees: "Yes, Sir! It's 100% Hodge".

    Seriously, guys, with Boyle on board, forget everything you knew about how EON makes a Bond film.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,997
    bondjames wrote: »
    Anecdotally yes, but they only started on this Boyle script recently to my knowledge. So really, if they had their ducks in order, they could have shaved two years off this wait. It's not like it's going to be any less rushed at the end of the day. The SF delay was forced on them to a degree by MGM's woes as I recall. They sort of had Mendes's idea locked quite early.
    I tend to agree.

    All very true, I'm just crossing every finger possible that this is gonna be a great Bond film haha :D
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    edited April 2018 Posts: 23,883
    Denbigh wrote: »

    All very true, I'm just crossing every finger possible that this is gonna be a great Bond film haha :D
    I certainly hope so too. We deserve it for our patience.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,997
    If you type Bond 25 into Google, Jez Butterworth is listed as another writer. HUH? I think this might be a mistake that someones carried over from Spectre.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    edited April 2018 Posts: 2,730
    Denbigh wrote: »
    If you type Bond 25 into Google, Jez Butterworth is listed as another writer. HUH? I think this might be a mistake that someones carried over from Spectre.

    Google isn’t super good. I remember they had spectres running time as like 2:40 or something for many months after release despite it being less then that.

    Edit- I checked right now, and it’s still listed as 2:40. The film is 2:28 in actuality
  • edited April 2018 Posts: 17,917
    Denbigh wrote: »
    If you type Bond 25 into Google, Jez Butterworth is listed as another writer. HUH? I think this might be a mistake that someones carried over from Spectre.

    Isn't there quite a lot copy-paste info on Bond 25? It was the last time I checked.
  • Posts: 19,339
    I find,and i know this is unusual,that WIKI is actually pretty on the ball with B25......someone is very keen to update it ,and so far correctly.
  • Posts: 12,571
    Naomi looking well, sincerely hoping for some sort of update soon!!!!
  • marketto007marketto007 Brazil
    Posts: 3,277
    Does anybody have a clip of naomie harris's comments from graham norton?

    This?

  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    edited April 2018 Posts: 3,157
    I think how long the gaps are is irrelevant to the quality.

    Agreed. Dr No, FRWL, GF and OHMSS all took shorter than Skyfall and SPECTRE and are all arguably better than both (personally I also rank QoS higher than Skyfall and it took half the time to be made).
  • RC7RC7
    edited April 2018 Posts: 10,512
    Walecs wrote: »

    Agreed. Dr No, FRWL, GF and OHMSS all took shorter than Skyfall and SPECTRE and are all arguably better than both (personally I also rank QoS higher than Skyfall and it took half the time to be made).

    QoS is hugely overrated. It’s ‘fine’, nothing more. Tragically aligned, by certain Bond fans, with OHMSS, which absolutely dumps on it from a stratospheric height.
  • BMW_with_missilesBMW_with_missiles All the usual refinements.
    Posts: 3,000
    RC7 wrote: »

    QoS is hugely overrated. It’s ‘fine’, nothing more. Tragically aligned, by certain Bond fans, with OHMSS, which absolutely dumps on it from a stratospheric height.

    I agree wholeheartedly.
  • RemingtonRemington I'll do anything for a woman with a knife.
    Posts: 1,538
    QOS forever, my friends.
  • Posts: 12,651
    CR > SF > QOS > SP.
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 14,327
    We have all the QOS in the world.
  • edited April 2018 Posts: 12,837
    RC7 wrote: »

    QoS is hugely overrated. It’s ‘fine’, nothing more. Tragically aligned, by certain Bond fans, with OHMSS, which absolutely dumps on it from a stratospheric height.

    To be honest even fine is a strong word. I'd say something like TND is fine. Nothing spectacular, but solid. QoS is an overrated pretentious mess imo. The writers strike didn't help but the film never stood a chance with Marc "lets make it short and fast 'like a bullet' even though we've got a million subplots to deal with but also make sure we waste what little running time time we do have on all my crap poorly edited chase scenes guys because they represent the elements it's so deep and arty" Forster behind the camera.
  • Posts: 16,443
    Walecs wrote: »

    Agreed. Dr No, FRWL, GF and OHMSS all took shorter than Skyfall and SPECTRE and are all arguably better than both (personally I also rank QoS higher than Skyfall and it took half the time to be made).

    Indeed. I find DN, FRWL, GF and OHMSS to be galaxies above SF and SP.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited April 2018 Posts: 8,842

    To be honest even fine is a strong word. I'd say something like TND is fine. Nothing spectacular, but solid. QoS is an overrated pretentious mess imo. The writers strike didn't help but the film never stood a chance with Marc "lets make it short and fast 'like a bullet' even though we've got a million subplots to deal with but also make sure we waste what little running time time we do have on all my crap poorly edited chase scenes guys because they represent the elements it's so deep and arty" Forster behind the camera.

    I agree, "fine" is far too generous.

    In reality the time needed between films is probably more connected to the type of story they're making. Something like TND can be cranked out, whereas a deeper story with more layers should take longer. SP was like TND, yet they thought they had a masterpiece on their hands that would tie everything together. Hopefully there is proper story for Bond 25 that justifies the gap, so we can get back to proper missions thereafter.
  • SeanCraigSeanCraig Germany
    edited April 2018 Posts: 732
    The comparison between OHMSS and QoS is mostly, in my book, the fact that the movie slowly grew on Bond fans over time instead of being an instant hit. „Out there“ many people still either don‘t know about the movie (OHMSS) or it‘s the one „with that other guy“.

    Personally, I like QoS a lot - for many valid reasons. It will never be CR (which the majority of the fan community finds great) but it‘s fan base seems to grow over time.
  • doubleoegodoubleoego #LightWork
    Posts: 11,140
    Denbigh wrote: »
    I'm sure Boyle will do a great job but I'm worried we're gonna go back to the tone of QoS, that gritty, hard tone,

    This is something to celebrate and not to be worried about.
  • mybudgetbondmybudgetbond The World
    Posts: 190
    doubleoego wrote: »

    This is something to celebrate and not to be worried about.

    +1

  • 00Agent00Agent Any man who drinks Dom Perignon '52 can't be all bad.
    edited April 2018 Posts: 5,186
    I couldn't care less about tone. I would welcome a lighter tone, but i don't expect that from Craig and thats fine. What i want is a good, entertaining and coherent movie that works. Craig only delivered two of those, but exceeded all expectations with both of them. Judging by the pattern of his movies, the next one should be a winner.
  • WalecsWalecs On Her Majesty's Secret Service
    Posts: 3,157

    +1

    +2
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    It just needs to be exciting and have an element of fun (that doesn’t mean comedy). QoS is neither of those, CR is. I’m happy for them to experiment with tone as long as it fits the above criteria.
  • Posts: 2,104
    I just have this feeling Blofeld will be back in some way. I just feel the producers would want that.
Sign In or Register to comment.