It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Combine that with the relatively lacklustre reception of his films I've come to one conclusion.
Dalton wasn't "movie star" material. Both Brozza and Craig are. That's y they've had more successful film careers.
It's true that Dalton may not have had that much luck on the big screen compared to Brosnan and Crag, not that Craig has really made much of a mark on his own, and without Bond. I would happily take Hawks over everything i've seen from Brosnan and Craig combined. Still, the fact Dalton wasn't a star means nothing to me, I still rate him as a superior actor.
This. Dalton wasn't bothered about being famous, he just wanted to act, and I really respect him for it. Plus, the only things I saw Craig in before Bond were Our Friends In The North (TV series), that god awful Tomb Raider film (which I didn't even realise he was in until after I saw CR), and Layer Cake. And now after Bond he is alot more famous, so without Bond he wouldn't be that big.
Dalton is a good actor but I'm afraid Craig is better, TGWTDT also is another highlight Dalton has never been this natural on the big screen.
I loved OFITN but I think Dalton is a slightly better actor, and a better bond.
its Timothy Dalton- who else could play james bond, Rassilon and Mr. Prickel Pants for TS3?
besides Timothy Dalton can act...Craig cant
My top three:
1. Sean Connery
2. Daniel Craig
3. Roger Moore
You can lump the rest together and put them in a dark corner to be forgotten.
Good points there Getafix about Craig and Dalton. I've always felt Dalton has more on screen presence than Craig. I do prefer Dalton to Craig but not by alot.
I preferred Craig in QOS to CR. He was too comedic and cocky in CR.
I am one of the few who crazies who actually enjoyed QoS more than CR. Although I thought Craig's performance in CR was decent and his relationship with Vespa both convincing and entertaining.
It would be great to see Dalton in Casino Royale!
In fairness to Timbo, the era in which he made the films were not the best for fashion and the make up techniques and clothes are quite ageing when looked back on, it's a shame they didn't go for a more timless look during the 80's.
Craig pre-Bond career was as varied and impressive as Dalton's I can assure you. I was very aware of him since Our Friends In The North in which he was magnificent. After that he had the lead in several smaller budget films and support roles in big budget Hollywood films. Similar to Dalton who was impressive as Heatcliffe in Wuthering Heights in 1970 (or 71) and built his career up until he was singing to Mae West and fighting with Charley's Angels. Wow.
Since Bond many doors open for the Bond actors. Craig like the others has become a star in his own right, top billing in many films. Dalton never really managed that. He actually acheived the level of success Craig had before Bond ie top billing in small films, support in big Hollywood films.
I will however accept the argument of his fans that he didn't become a big star because he..cough..didn't want to!!
I don't know why but Timbo never looked particulary tidy/smart, everything looked a casual, not sure if that was intentional.
What's so hard to believe about that? Unless your cough is genuine, In which case I apologise.
Not get too deep into this subject, but I though Timbo looked fine, physique wise. Bond wasn't supposed to be Mr Buff, just a regularish guy who abused his body but could take a lot of pain
No, I just don't truly believe that any actor shuns stardom completely. Otherwise I can't understand some of TDs choices along the way. Some of the TV mini series for example (post Bond) and small support roles in things like The Tourist and Hot Fuzz, don't smack of someone who can pick and choose his roles.
My personal thoughts are that TD simply isn't a cinema star - he doesn't command the screen, which is why he hasn't made it big in the cinema. No one is going to go see a Timothy Dalton film.
However, having said that when he starred in the West End production of His Dark Materials about 5 years ago I genuinely tried to get the opportunity to go and see him because of all the Bond actors I would prefer to see him on the stage. I believe he has a more commanding presence there than any other Bond star. Strange really, but it is only my opinion.
(as a footnote when His Dark Materials part 1 was turned into a film Dalton's role went to , you've guessed it, Daniel Craig (The Golden Compass). And if you've read the books it's Dalton who fits the role better)
Anyway, this isn't about what he's done outside of Bond, this is about if him or Craig is a better Bond. And I think Dalton is much better.
One more vote, and Dalton is ahead again :D
I probably agree with that. I like Craig but still rate Sean, Rog and Tim above him. Perhaps even George. Brozza is so far down the pecking order he's out of sight.
It's a hard choice for me. I like them both. I guess my appreciation for Dalton, which has existed for over 15 years now, beats Craig but ever so slightly. [/quote]