It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
Feldman and his friend, the director Howard Hawks, had an interest in adapting Casino Royale, considering Leigh Brackett as a writer and Cary Grant as James Bond. They eventually gave up once they saw the 1962 film Dr. No,
Writing in 1959 to his friend Ivar Bryce, whose company Xanadu was planning to make the first Bond film, Fleming said, "Both Dehn [a Hollywood screenwriter] and I think that Richard Burton would be by far the best James Bond."
Producer Charles K. Feldman kept him on a contract for two years before the film was made.
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Still though, I would have liked to see David Niven playing a less comical Bond. Shame his skills were so wasted in the spoof that we eventually got.
James Mason
Richard Burton
Rod Taylor
Terence Cooper was the one they initially cast, while the intention still was to make it a serious Bond film.
I think Laurence Harvey could have been a good Bond.
You're right--that's actually the best suggestion I've heard so far. Harvey would be perfect for the cold, brutal Bond of Fleming's Casino Royale, just as he played a convincing bitter assassin in The Manchurian Candidate.
And if anyone is wondering how good the serious version of Casino Royale could have been, make sure to read Jeremy Duns's Rogue Royale, his study of Ben Hecht's unused scripts.
Laurence Harvey is a great suggestion. Most likely a stronger candidate than my choice Terence Cooper.
The Independent newspaper:
Harvey possessed or developed a British upper class accent. Taking a guess, had Fleming known about Harvey pre-Doctor No (perhaps he didn't know of him?) he might have suggested him for the part.
People tend to forget the other leading candidates for Dr. No before Connery was finally chosen. Those were Stephen Boyd and Rod Taylor, besides Richard Johnson and Michael Craig, that is. Personally, I think Boyd would have made a very good Bond as well. It's funny to think that, at sometime, all of these actors have appeared in a Bond spoof after their initial consideration for the role in '61. Harvey was in The Spy with a Cold Nose (1966), Stephen Boyd was in Assignment K (1967), Rod Taylor was in The Liquidator (1965), Richard Johnson was in Danger Route (1967), while Michael Craig was in Modesty Blaise (1966).
The other plausible British alternative to Connery was Oliver Reed. In 1967, at which point Connery had seemingly left the role of 007, Reed was in the frame and despite Broccoli's claims that, "...with Reed we would have had a far greater problem to destroy his image and remould him as James Bond. We just didn't have the time or money to do that", the role could have been ideal for him. Though there is the faint suggestion that post-Oliver!, Reed may have been dropped on the grounds of cost, not so much his off-screen hellraising antics.
Here's a snap of Michael Craig in Modesty Blaise...
And while Laurence Harvey may seem to have lacked the physical toughness that some would say is essential for the role, Fleming appeared to define 'toughness' as the ability to take an incredible amount of punishment as well as being able to dish it out - an ability that certainly comes to the fore in Casino Royale.
Stanley Baker
and for an offbeat choice Dirk Bogarde in his matinee idol days
To see what I mean go to 56:38 to see Harvey’s skeletal frame...
Also, bit left field, but check out a vintage picture of Inspector Morse himself, John Thaw. He'd have been great in ''67. Cracking actor.
You know the more I think about this thread the more I hate the deplorable CR '67 and the wasted opportunity that turning it into a spoof was.
But it was child-actor Bobby Driscoll instead. He was famous as a child, working for Disney, but died in 1968 at age 31 after a long time of drug abuse. Really a sad story.
Which kinda makes me ponder hard about that. Sean Connery in Casino Royale? Almost as good as Sean Connery in On Her Majesty's Secret Service.
That was on TCM a few weeks ago. I missed the firt half hour or so. His build was one the slight side. But he definitely had something, a coldness to him.
If the ambition was to make a thriller and not a comedy, perhaps Feldman would not have needed to summon an ensemble cast of stars and Orson Welles would not have been selected here to play Le Chiffre. Nevertheless, I would have loved to see a serious confrontation between Sellers and Welles, adapted from Hecht's script which in all likelihood was excellent. If not Welles, maybe the great Robert Morley could have been available, and cheaper for Feldman. It seems to me that he would have been as good a choice, if not better.
and has he ever talked about Casino royale
He walked out of the picture before his part was finished. I don't think there is much about him talking. I think Sellers as a serious Bond would have been not what audiences were expecting.
Richard Burton would be another fine choice though.
There was Hoffman in 1970, but also The Prisoner of Zenda in 1979; despite being a comedy, Sellers plays a serious role in the later (but also a comedic one, he has two parts). They are the only ones which come to mind. There is also Being There, but the nature of his role is more ambiguous.