It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Also, I think Jamie Dornan has something. But he looks weird without a beard...
Good point. Haven't actually thought about that, but you're probably right – he did have a Fleming Bond quality to his looks in Haywire.
A Swedish Bond? Why not! Alexander Skarsgård – like his father, is a good actor, and wouldn't be a bad pick. At 1,94 m, he would certainly have the physicality on his side too. The major issue (if you look past that he isn't at all a Brit or of Commonwealth origin), is that he's 42 years old.
I'm not keen on Dornan I'm afraid.
What do folks think of Sam Heughan? I posted his interview from a few days back earlier where he said he auditioned for the part in 2005. Did others know about that? It was certainly news to me.
Saw that interview the other day. I've never seen Heughan in anything so I can't say much about his acting. I don't think he remotely looks like a Bond in that interview though. Says he's auditioned for CR. He must have been only about 25 at the time.
That said though, get rid of the beard, give him a proper Fleming-esque Bond haircut and put him in a well tailored suit ( not one that's too small), and I think he may have more potential that some of the other names mentioned.
Part of what's turning me away from so many of these names are today's fashions, which, IMO are pretty far removed from Bond. Ryan Seacrest's wardrobe in that interview for instance looks typical of what we're seeing today. Put Pierce Brosnan in that outfit and I think he'd probably look ridiculous. In fact Seacrest looks like a guy nearing middle age who is trying to look young and trendy. Heughan doesn't look much like Bond in the outfit he was sporting. This is probably why I have to really squint to see Bondian potential in most of the names mentioned.
This goes to show that not everything is leaked and that the number of actors who actually do an a audition is larger than it would appear.
Now I’m sure there’s a difference between an audition and a formal screentest.
I agree with you on today's attire as well. This slim pant/jacket look only works aesthetically on some imho. It's not for everyone. I personally prefer a regular cut myself.
That's a good point, and I wonder what exactly he was referring to (test vs. audition). It seems as though they cast quite a wide net in 2005 due to the nature of the reboot. Lots of variety, with the likes of Cavill, Heughan, Jackman and Craig in the mix, among others.
Toby could have been good imho. I realize he hammed it up for DAD, but he has something to him.
Toby Stephens would have been a great Bond, IMO. Shame he's already played a villain.
Re. Heughan: I wonder how far he got, and what EON thought of his audition. Never seen him in anything, unfortunately.
Except bond would have just been a cary grant character instead of his own identity.
According to Wikipedia, they considered more than 200 actors. Not all of them were screentested, I believe.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casino_Royale_(2006_film)#Casting
There really is no reason there can’t be both; it would obviously require the right directors and writers, but more importantly the right actor. Jackman is one of the few that can pull this off effortlessly, and is as skilled with the lighter material as he is being one of the most intimidating actors in film today. It’s rare that one person can skillfully pull of both.
I would have probably preferred him, or another fellow Aussie who was linked, Eric Bana, to Craig. Alas we got who did and most where pleased.
'I just felt at the time that the scripts has become so unbelievable and crazy, and I felt like they needed to become grittier and real.'
So, I'm not sure Mr. Jackman would have wanted lighter material, in this alternative universe of he being Bond. I can see him being very clear on what he wanted, and what he wanted is where the series went anyways. If anything, I can see him doing more of the throw away lines of Connery, not anything remotely close to resembling Moore or Brosnan.
However, I'm wondering how serious EoN was on him, since the Bond talk seems to be nothing more than a conversation he had with his agent, and not necessarily anything close to a sit down with Barbara, Michael, or anyone at EoN.
But I agree, he's an amazing actor and would have made a brilliant 007.
@ClarkDevlin That's the one.