› ›

Who should/could be a Bond actor?

1…722723725727728…1231

Comments

  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 395
    For Barbara Daniel is what Sir Roger was for Cubby.
  • cooperman2cooperman2 Uk
    Posts: 380
    I think Fassbender would have been great but didn't he say he wasn't interested in the role of Bond. Of course that was before he had three potential franchise flops. Maybe he may feel differently now.
  • FatherValentineFatherValentine England
    Posts: 737
    cooperman2 wrote: »
    I think Fassbender would have been great but didn't he say he wasn't interested in the role of Bond. Of course that was before he had three potential franchise flops. Maybe he may feel differently now.

    Well if he wasn't considered in 2005 then he has never been properly asked.

    It's a bit like me saying that I am not interested in being Gal Godot's boyfriend.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    edited October 2020 Posts: 395
    I think Eon will look Rupert Friend again when the casting start's.
  • UnivexUnivex
    edited October 2020 Posts: 6,709
    After watching The Haunting of Bly Manor, I hope they consider Oliver Jackson-Cohen. Guy can easily change between being charming and being scary within a second. Lots of potential there. Only thing is he is a bit too tall. And he looks better on film than in photographs.

    Screen%2BShot%2B2017-08-25%2Bat%2B8.32.59%2BAM%2B%255Bwww.imagesplitter.net%255D.jpeg
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 395
    Univex wrote: »
    After watching The Haunting of Bly Manor, I hope they consider Oliver Jackson-Cohen. Guy can easily change between being charming and being scary within a second. Lots of potential there. Only thing is he is a bit too tall. And he looks better on film than in photographs.

    Screen%2BShot%2B2017-08-25%2Bat%2B8.32.59%2BAM%2B%255Bwww.imagesplitter.net%255D.jpeg

    How much is bit too tall? How tall he is?
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,205
    MSL49 wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    After watching The Haunting of Bly Manor, I hope they consider Oliver Jackson-Cohen. Guy can easily change between being charming and being scary within a second. Lots of potential there. Only thing is he is a bit too tall. And he looks better on film than in photographs.

    Screen%2BShot%2B2017-08-25%2Bat%2B8.32.59%2BAM%2B%255Bwww.imagesplitter.net%255D.jpeg

    How much is bit too tall? How tall he is?
    Once an actor gets above 6’3” possibly 6’4” they are getting into the too tall range .
    Can you imagine a 6’7” Bond?

  • DoctorClatterhandDoctorClatterhand
    Posts: 162
    Univex wrote: »
    After watching The Haunting of Bly Manor, I hope they consider Oliver Jackson-Cohen. Guy can easily change between being charming and being scary within a second. Lots of potential there. Only thing is he is a bit too tall. And he looks better on film than in photographs.

    Screen%2BShot%2B2017-08-25%2Bat%2B8.32.59%2BAM%2B%255Bwww.imagesplitter.net%255D.jpeg

    Isn't he the same height as Dalton? Anyway, he definitely looks the part. I've only seen him in The Invisible Man and he was very impressive in that. He showed more range in that role than Cavill has in his entire career. Definitely a contender.
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    DoctorClatterhand wrote: »
    Univex wrote: »
    After watching The Haunting of Bly Manor, I hope they consider Oliver Jackson-Cohen. Guy can easily change between being charming and being scary within a second. Lots of potential there. Only thing is he is a bit too tall. And he looks better on film than in photographs.

    Screen%2BShot%2B2017-08-25%2Bat%2B8.32.59%2BAM%2B%255Bwww.imagesplitter.net%255D.jpeg

    Isn't he the same height as Dalton? Anyway, he definitely looks the part. I've only seen him in The Invisible Man and he was very impressive in that. He showed more range in that role than Cavill has in his entire career. Definitely a contender.

    Never scene this chap in anything. But I’ll keep a look out.
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,216
    Jackson-Cohen is 6' 3".
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    Jackson-Cohen is 6' 3".

    That’s a plus, but almost too tall!Ha ha ha!
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,785
    He could be paired with Elizabeth Debicki, also 6' 3". She'd still have to wear flats, though.
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    Posts: 5,970
    Lets jusy hope Marvel or DC don't pick him up before EON can.
  • Benjamin_Weekly69Benjamin_Weekly69 London
    Posts: 727
    CraigMooreOHMSS wrote: »
    Jackson-Cohen is 6' 3".

    It’s okay. The next bond film takes place primarily in the Netherlands. He would blend in as an average bloke.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 395
    Dominic Cooper.
  • Since62Since62
    Posts: 1,630
    6'3" would be fine ! Connery 6'2" Agreed that, at some point, you go from tall to "holy-cow-that-guy-is-really-tall !" Tom Selleck -- the original choice for Indiana Jones -- is 6'4"

    As for Oliver Jackson-Cohen...he played quite the villain in The Invisible Man...can you REALLY act that evil ? Or does it come from within ? Also -- is the world ready for a three-named Bond actor ?

    Alrrrrright, alright, just goofing here. Right age for playing in a few films, good height...As for someone playing in "one and done" oh, no, everyone knows that does not work well. They've been through that.

    By the way...is anyone feelin' it with this actor ?
  • ShardlakeShardlake Leeds, West Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 4,043
    Fassbender remains the actor more than any other for me that could have been Bond and utterly smashed it out the park.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    Posts: 395
    Why Tom Selleck didn't play Indiana Jones? What was the reason?
  • WillyGalore_ReduxWillyGalore_Redux I like my beer cold, my TV loud and my homosexuals flaaaaaaming
    edited October 2020 Posts: 294
    MSL49 wrote: »
    Why Tom Selleck didn't play Indiana Jones? What was the reason?

    He was contracted to Magnum P.I. so he couldn't accept. Much like Brosnan when he was contracted to Remington Steele in '86 and Bond went to Dalton instead.
  • mtmmtm United Kingdom
    Posts: 16,370
    MSL49 wrote: »
    Why Tom Selleck didn't play Indiana Jones? What was the reason?

    He couldn't get out of his Magnum PI contract- very much like Brosnan with Bond in 1986. A shame in a way; he'd have been very good.
  • DoctorClatterhandDoctorClatterhand
    Posts: 162
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Fassbender remains the actor more than any other for me that could have been Bond and utterly smashed it out the park.

    I think the same about Hugh Jackman. He has such a huge range. Handsome bugger too.
  • MSL49MSL49 Finland
    edited October 2020 Posts: 395
    Bond producers successed recasting with Moore and Ford is Jones till the end.
  • FatherValentineFatherValentine England
    Posts: 737
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Fassbender remains the actor more than any other for me that could have been Bond and utterly smashed it out the park.

    Yes
  • suavejmfsuavejmf Harrogate, North Yorkshire, England
    Posts: 5,131
    FatherValentine wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Fassbender remains the actor more than any other for me that could have been Bond and utterly smashed it out the park.

    Yes

    +1.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,753
    What about the new-ish vicar of Grantchester, Tom Brittney? 29 years old and 6' 2".

    grantchester.jpg
  • Herr_StockmannHerr_Stockmann
    Posts: 910
    I've never seen him in anything, but he certainly has the physique for the role, and his young age is an undeniable quality if shooting for Bond 26 do not start before some years. The question is whether he has the acting abilities to play the part.
  • UnivexUnivex
    Posts: 6,709
    A poor man James Norton (not that I'm advocating for Norton). Looks common and brute, IMO. But a very valid proposal, nonetheless.
  • TorgeirtrapTorgeirtrap
    Posts: 17,753
    Herr_Stockmann wrote: »
    I've never seen him in anything, but he certainly has the physique for the role, and his young age is an undeniable quality if shooting for Bond 26 do not start before some years. The question is whether he has the acting abilities to play the part.
    Univex wrote: »
    A poor man James Norton (not that I'm advocating for Norton). Looks common and brute, IMO. But a very valid proposal, nonetheless.

    I've only seen him in Grantchester, but I think he does that role quite fine – no worse than James Norton. Not at all a Bondian role, mind.
  • Pierce2DanielPierce2Daniel
    Posts: 4,408
    Torgeirtrap wrote: »
    What about the new-ish vicar of Grantchester, Tom Brittney? 29 years old and 6' 2".

    I can see. Good find.....

    I saw this on Twitter of someone speaking of how Pattinson is reminiscent of Bruce Wayne in Tenet. I guess I can see that, but I really see Bond.



    Is there a set of circumstances where Pattinson plays Bond? Perhaps if The Batman is not a critical darling or underperforms. It feels the DC fanbase aren't overly excited by Pattinson and are still mourning Ben Affleck apparently departing that role (despite him slated to return in some capacity). Also, DC are hedging their bets massively with Batman and giving us Michael Keaton and that other Affleck appearance.

    In such circumstances, you'll have three different actors playing the role at approximately the same time. Therefore, Pattinson won't be the Batman of the moment. Merely a Batman. I think this gives Pattinson some latitude to do 'one and done' much like Phoenix as the Joker. Then - hey presto - he can play Bond.....

    (There's also a slight possibility that Batman doesn't finish filming with Covid or Pattinson drops out.)

    The alternative is that Eon concede that he can play Batman and Bond simultaneously and cast him anyway. After Good Time, High Life, The Lighthouse and now Tenet, he is the best choice for the role by a country mile.

    Ej_SEROXsAEbgVM?format=jpg&name=small
    Ej_SERFWoAEvFTX?format=jpg&name=900x900
  • DenbighDenbigh UK
    edited October 2020 Posts: 5,970
    I don’t think so @Pierce2Daniel, and actually the fanbase are excited for Battinson, it’s just the hardcore Ben Affleck fans that are still against him unfortunately, mainly because they like to throw their toys out of the pram.

    I also think if The Batman doesn’t work out, I highly doubt he would then sign up for another franchise. Anyway, as much as I think Pattinson would be perfect, I’m loving what I’m seeing from his Batman and wish all the best for that film.

    Also, the film seems to perfectly encompass what is successful when it comes to DC. The darker, edgier look at the word that lead to the success of Nolan’s trilogy and Joker, so I think it’ll be fine.

    Honestly, I personally believe Callum Turner is the next best thing after Pattinson, but I’d also be interested to see Jackson-Cohen’s take on the character.
Sign In or Register to comment.