No Time To Die: Production Diary

1164716481650165216532507

Comments

  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Sorry guys, can't see it. As much chance of this happening as Elba being Bond #007. Zero.
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,195
    bondjames wrote: »
    Sorry guys, can't see it. As much chance of this happening as Elba being Bond #007. Zero.

    I wouldn’t go this far.

  • edited August 2018 Posts: 6,844
    Reasons to be bummed: no Boyle Bond, potential delay in release, smaller chance of Boyle regulars like composer John Murphy coming onboard

    Reasons to be hopeful: an opening for Martin Campbell, sounds like the script is still in good shape, avoiding a director who has bitten off more than he can chew or whose heart just isn’t in it (a la SPECTRE), the return of David Arnold? Dennis Gassner?

    Reasons to be terrified: they wouldn’t possibly go back to Sam Mendes...would they? WOULD THEY???
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    talos7 wrote: »
    bondjames wrote: »
    Sorry guys, can't see it. As much chance of this happening as Elba being Bond #007. Zero.

    I wouldn’t go this far.
    B26 with his spin on the script? Yes. Not B25.

    Didn't they go through a relatively long process of trying to get a director for this film already? I'm pretty sure they were trying to get a fit with Craig. I'd assume the replacement will be someone who he's either worked with, or can work with very quickly. They don't have a lot of time to get this going. Either that or they delay and reimagine it, in which case McQ may be interested.
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,604
    Reasons to be bummed: no Boyle Bond, potential delay in release, smaller chance of Boyle regulars like composer John Murphy coming onboard

    Reasons to be hopeful: an opening for Martin
    Campbell, sounds like the script is still in good shape, avoiding a director who has bitten off more than he can chew or who’s heart just isn’t in it (a la SPECTRE), the return of David Arnold? Dennis Gassner?

    Reasons to be terrified: they wouldn’t possibly go back to Sam Mendes...would they? WOULD THEY???

    Another reason to be terrified: they go back to Purvis and Wade's script, or just solely stick to them! If anyone needs to go (based on their comments before Spectre, and now with Trump), they probably feel they have run their course with Bond. New writers, please!
  • Posts: 9,843
    It’s the only silver lining in a sea of darkness
  • talos7talos7 New Orleans
    Posts: 8,195
    MI:F started filming without a finished script .
    Now realistically I know It’s highly unlikely. But what if the would give him a 5 or 6 month delay?
  • RichardTheBruceRichardTheBruce I'm motivated by my Duty.
    Posts: 13,767
    Witness. Bond history.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited August 2018 Posts: 4,583
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.
    2. No indication that the script has been scrapped.
    3. The fact that DC's name is on the announcement means he is still on board
    4. Finding a director, with a script in place, won't be much of an issue.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    TripAces wrote: »
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.

    Or you could stop. Just sayin.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    Martin campbell deserves his own bond actor and his own film, not some sloppy seconds
  • MaxCasinoMaxCasino United States
    Posts: 4,604
    Not many directors have made a trilogy, with the third film being the best. So I agree stop with Martin Campbell, and hope for a actual action director, realistically.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    =))
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    talos7 wrote: »
    MI:F started filming without a finished script .
    Now realistically I know It’s highly unlikely. But what if the would give him a 5 or 6 month delay?
    Anything is possible but what would be the motivation for either party? It's not like McQ is going to top the MI action sequences in a Bond film, at least not without crazy Tom as the front man. So wouldn't the expectations of the audience and the press be deflated by the finished result? It's highly possible.

    Why would EON go running to the director of the last two films from their biggest competitor franchise? It seems like an admission of defeat, especially after they so openly decided on this slightly different route with Mr. Boyle.

    No, I think they need to replace Boyle with another arty farty. Someone who can make it seem like they've gone 'like with like', even if it's superficial. Either that or take time off and reimagine the concept.
    Martin campbell deserves his own bond actor and his own film, not some sloppy seconds
    I quite agree.
  • Posts: 9,843
    What about Ron Howard lol
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Risico007 wrote: »
    What about Ron Howard lol
    Excellent director who can save a film. I'm not sure about fit with Craig, but I wouldn't object to Howard. The Dan Brown adaptations are absolutely superb and rather Bond-like in terms of style and locations.
  • Posts: 1,680
    I think in the last month they were surprised & put off by fallout & tried to get Boyle to go that level of action & keep the character piece & he backed out got nervous.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,583
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.

    Or you could stop. Just sayin.

    Campbell's great work after CR: tell me. I'll wait. I mean, CR was twelve years ago. So breakdown the brilliant directing career of Martin Campbell, 2006-2018. That'll be entertaining. The woodie that some of you have for this hack is one of the great mysteries on this site.
  • Posts: 9,843
    bondjames wrote: »
    Risico007 wrote: »
    What about Ron Howard lol
    Excellent director who can save a film. I'm not sure about fit with Craig, but I wouldn't object to Howard. The Dan Brown adaptations are absolutely superb and rather Bond-like in terms of style and locations.

    He is a workman director with Oscar clout really the best of both worlds...

    Still hoping the Mcquarrie rumors are true
  • Tuck91 wrote: »
    I think in the last month they were surprised & put off by fallout & tried to get Boyle to go that level of action & keep the character piece & he backed out got nervous.

    True, it could be a matter of nerves and not have anything at all to do with "creative differences."
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    TripAces wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.

    Or you could stop. Just sayin.

    Campbell's great work after CR: tell me. I'll wait. I mean, CR was twelve years ago. So breakdown the brilliant directing career of Martin Campbell, 2006-2018. That'll be entertaining. The woodie that some of you have for this hack is one of the great mysteries on this site.

    ufhAW15.gif
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    Tuck91 wrote: »
    I think in the last month they were surprised & put off by fallout & tried to get Boyle to go that level of action & keep the character piece & he backed out got nervous.

    True, it could be a matter of nerves and not have anything at all to do with "creative differences."
    It would be a foolish mistake to try and match Fallout in action terms imho. They should aim for one great action sequence (like the SF PTS) and then for lower key suspenseful sequences, again like what they did with CR/SF.

    If this is in fact what happened, then I'm more curious than ever about what Boyle had planned, because I may have liked a more low key suspenseful affair.

    I wonder who he had creative differences with. Universal, EON or Craig?

    This could be about box office pressure.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    Posts: 4,583
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.

    Or you could stop. Just sayin.

    Campbell's great work after CR: tell me. I'll wait. I mean, CR was twelve years ago. So breakdown the brilliant directing career of Martin Campbell, 2006-2018. That'll be entertaining. The woodie that some of you have for this hack is one of the great mysteries on this site.

    ufhAW15.gif

    Exactly.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    TripAces wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.

    Or you could stop. Just sayin.

    Campbell's great work after CR: tell me. I'll wait. I mean, CR was twelve years ago. So breakdown the brilliant directing career of Martin Campbell, 2006-2018. That'll be entertaining. The woodie that some of you have for this hack is one of the great mysteries on this site.

    ufhAW15.gif

    Exactly.

    There there it will be all over soon. You just need your snickers. That's why you're cranky.
    tenor.gif
  • CraigMooreOHMSSCraigMooreOHMSS Dublin, Ireland
    Posts: 8,205
    TripAces wrote: »
    Murdock wrote: »
    TripAces wrote: »
    1. Some of you need to STOP with the Martin Campbell nonsense!!!!! Seriously.

    Or you could stop. Just sayin.

    Campbell's great work after CR: tell me. I'll wait. I mean, CR was twelve years ago. So breakdown the brilliant directing career of Martin Campbell, 2006-2018. That'll be entertaining. The woodie that some of you have for this hack is one of the great mysteries on this site.

    I really wish people would stop using this word, especially those who clearly don't actually understand what it means and seem incapable of using it correctly.

    Campbell has many good to great films on his resumé that both critics and fans like, so that alone means the insult is inaccurate.

  • Posts: 1,858
    The idea that some 007 fans don't see why they need the TALENT of Martin Campbell at this point is very disheartening. The real problem lies with the producers. They are the ones who green lit the idea that Bond and Blofeld are stepbrothers. I, for one, will NEVER get over that decision and expect them miss the mark again.
  • StrelikStrelik Spectre Island
    Posts: 108
    MaxCasino wrote: »
    Another reason to be terrified: they go back to Purvis and Wade's script, or just solely stick to them! If anyone needs to go (based on their comments before Spectre, and now with Trump), they probably feel they have run their course with Bond. New writers, please!
    Agreed. If Babs reverts to the rejected script by P&W, it will kill my interest in Bond 25 stone dead. Even worse, I fear Babs might hand over Hodges' unfinished script to P&W and order them to hastily finish it before production starts (as they did with Spectre).

    Let us hope that Hodges' script is completed and used, or new writers are brought in.
  • TripAcesTripAces Universal Exports
    edited August 2018 Posts: 4,583
    "Yes, to save Bond, let's bring in the 74-year-old director responsible for Green Lantern!"

    giphy.gif
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    TripAces wrote: »
    "Yes, let's bring in the 74-year-old director responsible for Green Lantern!"

    giphy.gif

    Did you forget he directed two of the Best Bond movies ever?
  • Goldeneye0094Goldeneye0094 Conyers, GA
    Posts: 464
    I honestly think they will hire a new director in a week or two and have the new director use hodge's script there is really no reason eon should halt pre-production when they have to meet the 2019 release date
Sign In or Register to comment.