It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I think this is a bit too optimistic/fast. First they have to find a new partner studio, that may be done by February/March. Then they can maybe start trowing ideas around. I don't think DC is going to have an answer for them before Jun/July. When they know his final answer, it's either search for new director or for the new Bond. With all that in place then we can expect some news about writers.
Off course, my guess.
He did. Bond discovered he had a kid. It was a major plot point.
Bring him back, and next thing you know, Blofeld will be his uncle or something.
Maybe an idea and first draft from purvis and wade and the jet butter worth
Mendes is a fine director and listening to him talk is full of good ideas and character arcs. The problem is he talked s good game with SP but the script didn't deliver.
I'd hope that, too - and indeed I'd assume he would. Weird if not.
Yes, exactly.
A big YES! to this
It would be cool to have him marked like he was in the novels, and a tattoo is easily enough removed, but we'd have at least one film of Bond with his "scar."
Because it would just become a continuity error.
A tattoo the filmmakers don't have to commit to after one film.
He was contract to do 2 more after Skyfall not just 1. Sorry about that mistake.
I don't blame Haggis for his baby plot. The producers need to brief their writers on simple don'ts; such as no James Bond code name and Bond should not be a parent. It's not terribly difficult to come up with certain stipulations that won't impede the writing creative process of a good story. It'll save time and disappointments for everyone involved.
Well it wouldn't be Bond's kid, just Vesper's. But it's very close to the opening of The Bourne Ultimatum when Bourne goes back to tell the daughter of his first assassination how her parents really died, which is what pisses me off most about the thought of introducing Vesper's child to the film.
It really is a terrible idea, Bond's kid or not.
I just don't want kids to be part of the plot full stop.
I just want this series to get new great writers and to give us an incredibly gripping story. No pretense and no bs.