› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…316317319321322…2507

Comments

  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384
    It's probably a twitch by now. ;)
  • bondjamesbondjames You were expecting someone else?
    Posts: 23,883
    This whole page is a series of winks. I'll play along. ;)
  • ThunderfingerThunderfinger Das Boot Hill
    Posts: 45,489
    Henchman in Bond 25:

    Mr Winx. ;)
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    Awww group wink!!~ (;
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Yippie-Ki-Yay, MotherWinkers! ;)
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Yippie-Ki-Yay, MotherWinkers! ;)

    Lol
  • mcdonbbmcdonbb deep in the Heart of Texas
    Posts: 4,116
    ClarkDevlin wrote: »
    Yippie-Ki-Yay, MotherWinkers! ;)

    Lol
  • ThunderpussyThunderpussy My Secret Lair
    Posts: 13,384

    Everyone's at it. ;)
  • Red_SnowRed_Snow Australia
    Posts: 2,538
    More prattle from Page Six with some comments from "sources".

    A Hollywood source tells us that Bond producers and MGM are not in an urgent rush to cast the new Bond because the distribution rights for the franchise are up for sale following the end of a multimovie pact with Sony Pictures.

    The source says, “No casting for the next James Bond movie will be decided on until the deal for the distribution rights has been done.”

    Meanwhile, there are still bad feelings between Bond bosses and the most recent star Daniel Craig, who famously said he “would rather break this glass and slit my wrists” than play 007 again. Another source added, “Producers think that ungracious comment, right before the release of ‘Spectre,’ cost them tens of millions at the box office. They’re ready to forget about Daniel.”

  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    Red, that is old. I already read THAT crap weeks or so ago. Its not true either.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    More prattle from Page Six with some comments from "sources".

    A Hollywood source tells us that Bond producers and MGM are not in an urgent rush to cast the new Bond because the distribution rights for the franchise are up for sale following the end of a multimovie pact with Sony Pictures.

    The source says, “No casting for the next James Bond movie will be decided on until the deal for the distribution rights has been done.”

    Meanwhile, there are still bad feelings between Bond bosses and the most recent star Daniel Craig, who famously said he “would rather break this glass and slit my wrists” than play 007 again. Another source added, “Producers think that ungracious comment, right before the release of ‘Spectre,’ cost them tens of millions at the box office. They’re ready to forget about Daniel.”
    Any "source" who says anything along the lines of this should be immediately discarded.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    More prattle from Page Six with some comments from "sources".

    A Hollywood source tells us that Bond producers and MGM are not in an urgent rush to cast the new Bond because the distribution rights for the franchise are up for sale following the end of a multimovie pact with Sony Pictures.

    The source says, “No casting for the next James Bond movie will be decided on until the deal for the distribution rights has been done.”

    Meanwhile, there are still bad feelings between Bond bosses and the most recent star Daniel Craig, who famously said he “would rather break this glass and slit my wrists” than play 007 again. Another source added, “Producers think that ungracious comment, right before the release of ‘Spectre,’ cost them tens of millions at the box office. They’re ready to forget about Daniel.”

    I see what they're getting at there. Makes a lot of sense if you think about it.
  • daltondalton
    Posts: 1,631
    Most likely the same "sources" that said that first Hiddleston and then Turner would be announced as Bond back in June.

    As usual, nothing to see here, unfortunately.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    More prattle from Page Six with some comments from "sources".

    A Hollywood source tells us that Bond producers and MGM are not in an urgent rush to cast the new Bond because the distribution rights for the franchise are up for sale following the end of a multimovie pact with Sony Pictures.

    The source says, “No casting for the next James Bond movie will be decided on until the deal for the distribution rights has been done.”

    Meanwhile, there are still bad feelings between Bond bosses and the most recent star Daniel Craig, who famously said he “would rather break this glass and slit my wrists” than play 007 again. Another source added, “Producers think that ungracious comment, right before the release of ‘Spectre,’ cost them tens of millions at the box office. They’re ready to forget about Daniel.”

    I see what they're getting at there. Makes a lot of sense if you think about it.

    The simple fact is, people didn't take to SP in the way they did SF. That's what cost them money, not Craig's comments and everyone involved knows that.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    RC7 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    More prattle from Page Six with some comments from "sources".

    A Hollywood source tells us that Bond producers and MGM are not in an urgent rush to cast the new Bond because the distribution rights for the franchise are up for sale following the end of a multimovie pact with Sony Pictures.

    The source says, “No casting for the next James Bond movie will be decided on until the deal for the distribution rights has been done.”

    Meanwhile, there are still bad feelings between Bond bosses and the most recent star Daniel Craig, who famously said he “would rather break this glass and slit my wrists” than play 007 again. Another source added, “Producers think that ungracious comment, right before the release of ‘Spectre,’ cost them tens of millions at the box office. They’re ready to forget about Daniel.”

    I see what they're getting at there. Makes a lot of sense if you think about it.

    The simple fact is, people didn't take to SP in the way they did SF. That's what cost them money, not Craig's comments and everyone involved knows that.

    Still, does make you wonder when these reports keep coming to light. There's no smoke without fire, as they say.
  • RC7RC7
    Posts: 10,512
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    RC7 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    Red_Snow wrote: »
    More prattle from Page Six with some comments from "sources".

    A Hollywood source tells us that Bond producers and MGM are not in an urgent rush to cast the new Bond because the distribution rights for the franchise are up for sale following the end of a multimovie pact with Sony Pictures.

    The source says, “No casting for the next James Bond movie will be decided on until the deal for the distribution rights has been done.”

    Meanwhile, there are still bad feelings between Bond bosses and the most recent star Daniel Craig, who famously said he “would rather break this glass and slit my wrists” than play 007 again. Another source added, “Producers think that ungracious comment, right before the release of ‘Spectre,’ cost them tens of millions at the box office. They’re ready to forget about Daniel.”

    I see what they're getting at there. Makes a lot of sense if you think about it.

    The simple fact is, people didn't take to SP in the way they did SF. That's what cost them money, not Craig's comments and everyone involved knows that.

    Still, does make you wonder when these reports keep coming to light. There's no smoke without fire, as they say.

    It's just the usual bobbins, though. If SP had made $1.5bn it would be non story. It's typical tabloid spin.
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    edited July 2016 Posts: 6,601
    Its an old, recycled article. I suppose, if we look for it, we find the same arguments. I think, I remember dear Mendes same ***
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    If Craig does return, hopefully it'll be a case like Harrison Ford in The Force Awakens. Harrison had become known as an irritable curmudgeon who mainly acted for paychecks. TFA was viewed as something of a comeback. Maybe B25 could be a similar situation, with Craig really putting his heart into one final film.
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    The House of Murdoch is in disagreement about what Eon thinks of Craig.

    https://hmssweblog.wordpress.com/2016/07/29/caveat-emptor-murdoch-tabloids-disagree-about-craig/
  • GermanladyGermanlady
    Posts: 6,601
    His Heart was Never NOT in it. His bravery working through the knee injury SAVED them millions of Dollars.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    edited July 2016 Posts: 28,694
    Yes, it's right on the money reporting. Dan is so committed to the role (most committed Bond yet), he's uncommitted. Wait...

    Yes, I'm certain MGM and co. are ready to be done with Dan and his billion dollar grossing Bond arse. =))
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    Apparently to some he was lazy and bored in SP.
    What-Meme-13.jpg
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    I'm with you, @Murdock. Not once did I question his performance in SP.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    Another man's trash is another man's treasure.

    Another man's lazy and bored is another man's relaxed and confident (I'm in this camp).

    Craig was kicking butt and taking names in SP, all over the damn place. Dan's performance was so Connery-esque in his absolute control over Bond's cat-like movements, stringent actions and unflappable speech that we might as well starting call it and other performances like it Craig-esque. Though I will concede that Craig-esque doesn't sound as catchy.
  • MurdockMurdock The minus world
    Posts: 16,351
    SP was wonderful, I can't wait for that to continue into Bond25. ;)
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited July 2016 Posts: 8,395
    Hey, he didn't build that, ok? It took roads to get there. Roads and bridges and the internet and money.
  • 0BradyM0Bondfanatic70BradyM0Bondfanatic7 Quantum Floral Arrangements: "We Have Petals Everywhere"
    Posts: 28,694
    The internet that widely despised Dan's casting and called for his exit to the tunes of "who's this big-eared blondie thug" were inarguably instrumental in all his later successes. Wait...
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    edited July 2016 Posts: 10,591
    0BradyM0Bondfanatic7 wrote: »
    Another man's trash is another man's treasure.

    Another man's lazy and bored is another man's relaxed and confident (I'm in this camp).

    Craig was kicking butt and taking names in SP, all over the damn place. Dan's performance was so Connery-esque in his absolute control over Bond's cat-like movements, stringent actions and unflappable speech that we might as well starting call it and other performances like it Craig-esque. Though I will concede that Craig-esque doesn't sound as catchy.

    Well said, sir.
  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    Murdock wrote: »
    Apparently to some he was lazy and bored in SP.
    What-Meme-13.jpg

    They might be confusing him with his co-star Christoph Waltz. ;)

    No, Craig was fantastic in Spectre. He was relaxed and funny and in top form. Liked him much better here than in Skyfall.
  • DonnyDB5DonnyDB5 Buffalo, New York
    Posts: 1,755
    I'll never understand that claim. Craig was in top form in SP. Witty, confident, and cool. Major swagger exuding from him.
Sign In or Register to comment.