It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Wishful thinking, perhaps even on Turner's part.
Yes, Craig is not a soulless closet case.
Or 26.
I always though his code name was James Bondage
Don't forget, Craig also likes to get physically in shape for the role too - I believe he has a lot of respect for the franchise and character so I definitely see him bowing out of the role when he feels he is no longer convincing as the character. We really don't need to worry about a repeat of Moore in AVTAK when it comes to Craig.
Erm @SkyfallCraig did you read this bit of the article?!
That deal is now all but dead, industry sources said.
A spokesman for MGM said “MGM is in the strongest position ever and is not for sale.”
"all but dead" = Unlikely to happen
It basically means that it would now take something extraordinary to get the deal back on.
As I mentioned some months back, if they go with an IPO down the road, they will inevitably be snapped up on the open market by a larger suitor, so they are just delaying the inevitable. Consolidation is the name of the game in this industry, as in many others.
I blame Harry.
Like I said before, Saltzman really screwed the Broccolis over.
again Bond on a budget can be done and not even look or be that bad.
Could this mean the MGM is going to flat out distribute Bond 25 by themselves? And can they is the question? :-?
The hold up is the distributor as far as I'm aware. EON are in development.
I think this is more wishful thinking on your part.
It's the same New York Post story. Both the Post and Marketwatch are owned by Murdoch. The story has a Feb. 25 date and there's a line at the end that the story originally ran in the Post.
However, the very end of the story appears to have been updated. It probably was after the Wall Street Journal (also owned by Murdoch) said the deal was off.
Yep and with this logical proactive approach Bond 25 better not be a bs Bond movie. If ever there was a time to get the script sorted, they've had more than enough time and still have some time to get it right.