› › ›

No Time To Die: Production Diary

1…644645647649650…2507

Comments

  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited March 2017 Posts: 8,395
    peter wrote: »
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.

    There's a name for that phenomenon. It's called "The Oyelowo Smile".
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    @Mendes, I just bashed my head against a concrete wall several times. Now I see what you're saying... It all makes perfect sense now... (nudge, nudge, wink, wink).
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.

    There's a name for that phenomenon. It's called "The Oyelowo Smile".
    So you think David Oyelowo smiling in that Colbert interview somehow indicates that Turner has been cast? Interesting.
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    edited March 2017 Posts: 8,395
    jake24 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.

    There's a name for that phenomenon. It's called "The Oyelowo Smile".
    So you think David Oyelowo smiling in that Colbert interview somehow indicates that Turner has been cast? Interesting.

    Er, no, but did you notice how everyone suddenly thought that Craig had decided to come back after Oyelowo smiled in that interview? If not, I can always find the comments and show them to you. That's the definition of drawing your own conclusions, wouldn't you say?
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.

    There's a name for that phenomenon. It's called "The Oyelowo Smile".
    So you think David Oyelowo smiling in that Colbert interview somehow indicates that Turner has been cast? Interesting.

    Er, no, but did you notice how everyone suddenly thought that Craig had decided to come back after Oyelowo smiled in that interview? If not, I can always find the comments and show them to you. That's the definition of drawing your own conclusions, wouldn't you say?

    Firstly there's no sense in arguing because literally nothing has happend with bond so far, secondly aiden can't be cast because he looks like a child
  • Mendes4LyfeMendes4Lyfe The long road ahead
    Posts: 8,395
    JamesBondKenya wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.

    There's a name for that phenomenon. It's called "The Oyelowo Smile".
    So you think David Oyelowo smiling in that Colbert interview somehow indicates that Turner has been cast? Interesting.

    Er, no, but did you notice how everyone suddenly thought that Craig had decided to come back after Oyelowo smiled in that interview? If not, I can always find the comments and show them to you. That's the definition of drawing your own conclusions, wouldn't you say?

    Firstly there's no sense in arguing because literally nothing has happend with bond so far, secondly aiden can't be cast because he looks like a child

    Who's arguing? Not me.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    JamesBondKenya wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    jake24 wrote: »
    Mendes4Lyfe wrote: »
    peter wrote: »
    @Mendes, you are joking right? As the man said, you've drawn your own conclusions.

    There's a name for that phenomenon. It's called "The Oyelowo Smile".
    So you think David Oyelowo smiling in that Colbert interview somehow indicates that Turner has been cast? Interesting.

    Er, no, but did you notice how everyone suddenly thought that Craig had decided to come back after Oyelowo smiled in that interview? If not, I can always find the comments and show them to you. That's the definition of drawing your own conclusions, wouldn't you say?

    Firstly there's no sense in arguing because literally nothing has happend with bond so far, secondly aiden can't be cast because he looks like a child

    Who's arguing? Not me.

    I'm just saying all of this means nothing because we've got no real news
  • peterpeter Toronto
    edited March 2017 Posts: 9,509
    @JamesBondKenya, I think there is more happening on Bond 25, as @RC7 has suggested.
    And if I was a betting man, the fact that DC hasn't relinquished the role, Babs just produced his last play and loves him more than Cubby loved Moore, he's meeting with Omega (he's only a plausible face for them as Bond, not as DC the actor), that his latest effort for United Nations includes meeting him and an Aston Martin, IF I was a betting man, I would bet my house, my three kids and my two golden retrievers that we have not seen the last of DC as 007
  • echoecho 007 in New York
    Posts: 6,287
    peter wrote: »
    @JamesBondKenya, I think there is more happening on Bond 25, as @RC7 has suggested.
    And if I was a betting man, the fact that DC hasn't relinquished the role, Babs just produced his last play and loves him more than Cubby loved Moore, he's meeting with Omega (he's only a plausible face for them as Bond, not as DC the actor), that his latest effort for United Nations includes meeting him and an Aston Martin, IF I was a betting man, I would bet my house, my three kids and my two golden retrievers that we have not seen the last of DC as 007

    ^This. She's wooing him back.
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    Posts: 1,756
    @PanchitoPistoles any bets? ;)
  • AlexanderWaverlyAlexanderWaverly
    Posts: 2,115
    re: MGM date. Last year, it was on or around March 24. IF MGM keeps to a similar schedule, it'd be on or around March 23.

    re: Purity start date. IF it's Aug. 1 (as mentioned earlier in this thread), then it's going to take up pretty much the rest of 2017.
  • peterpeter Toronto
    Posts: 9,509
    Hey, @dominicgreene, I said IF I was a betting man... But, what the hell.. I'll take on all bets (I may only be 43, but all my kids are teens, so if I lose, I win!)
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    AlexanderWaverly wrote: »
    re: MGM date. Last year, it was on or around March 24. IF MGM keeps to a similar schedule, it'd be on or around March 23.

    re: Purity start date. IF it's Aug. 1 (as mentioned earlier in this thread), then it's going to take up pretty much the rest of 2017.

    So are you saying the earliest Craig could film would be like Jan 2018
  • Some_Kind_Of_HeroSome_Kind_Of_Hero
    Posts: 6,844
    bondjames wrote: »
    He's not bad actually. A bit of a sleazebag on screen, but I like the guy in GoT. He should at least be a villain of sorts.

    Aidan Gillen is a fantastic actor. He had a very brief part during the "LTK" opening of The Dark Knight Rises, too. I'd love to see him in a Bond film, and as I see others have mentioned, the first thing that came to mind was, wow, he'd have been a much better Denbigh than Scott. But I would want a much better role for him. Some kind of supporting villain or even a dubious ally part would be great. Here's hoping.
  • GetafixGetafix
    edited March 2017 Posts: 11,425
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Denbigh should have been more near Mallory's age, watching it Friday night his performance is so one note.

    Fiennes needed someone with more dramatic weight to act up against, Gary Oldman would have been dream casting for that role but he wouldn't have been the villian from the get go like it's so obviously sign posted in SPECTRE.

    Aiden Gillen definitely would have been a improvement over Scott, is sneering was so annoying, it was like Moriarty dialed down to 3.

    Andrew Scott I know can be a good actor but I think when it comes to villains he only has one performance and he just riffs on that, much better in a drama with something real to play.

    It's like Waltz I think on paper it was thought, well we have the 2 time Oscar winning actor to play Blofeld, envisaging something along the lines as iconic as Han Landa when what we got was something less threatening that Dominic Greene, infact I much preferred Almaric's DG.

    The plot was overly complex with too many strands and not enough rigour in the writing. A hallmark of the Mendes era.

    I feel Mendes finds it very difficult to decide what he wants to focus on. It's like he's always trying to cram an extra half a movie in. He needs to learn to cut stuff out and demand tighter writing.

    For all the criticism of QOS it's virtue is that it doesn't try and do too much. Relatively simple plot. And I like Almeric's performance. He did the best he could with the material. Underrated villain and movie IMO.
  • JamesBondKenyaJamesBondKenya Danny Boyle laughs to himself
    Posts: 2,730
    Getafix wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Denbigh should have been more near Mallory's age, watching it Friday night his performance is so one note.

    Fiennes needed someone with more dramatic weight to act up against, Gary Oldman would have been dream casting for that role but he wouldn't have been the villian from the get go like it's so obviously sign posted in SPECTRE.

    Aiden Gillen definitely would have been a improvement over Scott, is sneering was so annoying, it was like Moriarty dialed down to 3.

    Andrew Scott I know can be a good actor but I think when it comes to villains he only has one performance and he just riffs on that, much better in a drama with something real to play.

    It's like Waltz I think on paper it was thought, well we have the 2 time Oscar winning actor to play Blofeld, envisaging something along the lines as iconic as Han Landa when what we got was something less threatening that Dominic Greene, infact I much preferred Almaric's DG.

    The plot was overly complex with too many strands and not enough rigour in the writing. A hallmark of the Mendes era.

    I feel Mendes finds it very difficult to decide what he wants to focus on. It's like he's always trying to cram an extra half a movie in. He needs to learn to cut stuff out and demand tighter writing.

    For all the criticism of QOS it's virtue is that it doesn't try and do too much. Relatively simple plot. And I like Almeric's performance. He did the best he could with the material. Underrated villain and movie IMO.

    I'm not sure have you given your list of favorite bond films?
  • GetafixGetafix
    Posts: 11,425
    GF, OHMSS, DN, FRWL, YOLT, TSWLM, OP, TLD.
  • SkyfallCraigSkyfallCraig Rome, Italy
    Posts: 630
    JamesBondKenya wrote: »
    AlexanderWaverly wrote: »
    re: MGM date. Last year, it was on or around March 24. IF MGM keeps to a similar schedule, it'd be on or around March 23.

    re: Purity start date. IF it's Aug. 1 (as mentioned earlier in this thread), then it's going to take up pretty much the rest of 2017.

    So are you saying the earliest Craig could film would be like Jan 2018

    And that would be perfect for a late 2018 release. SPECTRE started filming at mid-december 2014
  • dominicgreenedominicgreene The Eternal QOS Defender
    Posts: 1,756
    Getafix wrote: »
    Shardlake wrote: »
    Denbigh should have been more near Mallory's age, watching it Friday night his performance is so one note.

    Fiennes needed someone with more dramatic weight to act up against, Gary Oldman would have been dream casting for that role but he wouldn't have been the villian from the get go like it's so obviously sign posted in SPECTRE.

    Aiden Gillen definitely would have been a improvement over Scott, is sneering was so annoying, it was like Moriarty dialed down to 3.

    Andrew Scott I know can be a good actor but I think when it comes to villains he only has one performance and he just riffs on that, much better in a drama with something real to play.

    It's like Waltz I think on paper it was thought, well we have the 2 time Oscar winning actor to play Blofeld, envisaging something along the lines as iconic as Han Landa when what we got was something less threatening that Dominic Greene, infact I much preferred Almaric's DG.

    The plot was overly complex with too many strands and not enough rigour in the writing. A hallmark of the Mendes era.

    I feel Mendes finds it very difficult to decide what he wants to focus on. It's like he's always trying to cram an extra half a movie in. He needs to learn to cut stuff out and demand tighter writing.

    For all the criticism of QOS it's virtue is that it doesn't try and do too much. Relatively simple plot. And I like Almeric's performance. He did the best he could with the material. Underrated villain and movie IMO.

    I'm dominicgreene and I approve this message.

  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,582
    Moderator note:

    If anyone is baffled by the lack of news content in this thread, please refer to PAGE 1 where a diary of facts and/or rumours has been scrupulously updated by @jake24.
  • jake24jake24 Sitting at your desk, kissing your lover, eating supper with your familyModerator
    Posts: 10,591
    Cheers, @NicNac.
  • NicNacNicNac Administrator, Moderator
    Posts: 7,582
    I'll drop that note in every page or so.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    NicNac wrote: »
    Moderator note:

    If anyone is baffled by the lack of news content in this thread, please refer to PAGE 1 where a diary of facts and/or rumours has been scrupulously updated by @jake24.

    Thank you :-bd
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    Wow this page has gone quiet for a day as Connery's bond in goldfinger would say (shocking) =)) =D> >-) :-? =P~
  • Creasy47Creasy47 In Cuba with Natalya.Moderator
    Posts: 40,967
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    Wow this page has gone quiet for a day as Connery's bond in goldfinger would say (shocking) =)) =D> >-) :-? =P~

    Because there's nothing to be said, since nothing is really going on. Anything past that is spammy, and thankfully people have held off on posting while nothing concrete has been happening.
  • 007Blofeld007Blofeld In the freedom of the West.
    Posts: 3,126
    Creasy47 wrote: »
    007Blofeld wrote: »
    Wow this page has gone quiet for a day as Connery's bond in goldfinger would say (shocking) =)) =D> >-) :-? =P~

    Because there's nothing to be said, since nothing is really going on. Anything past that is spammy, and thankfully people have held off on posting while nothing concrete has been happening.

    Yeah true things have sure been quiet lately :-bd :-?? :-w
  • fire_and_icefire_and_ice
    Posts: 6,432
    NicNac wrote: »
    Moderator note:

    If anyone is baffled by the lack of news content in this thread, please refer to PAGE 1 where a diary of facts and/or rumours has been scrupulously updated by @jake24.

    Thanks for that @Jake24 a few days not looking at the Bond 25 production thread usually means a 100 plus posts, its good to read a concise breakdown of any developments.

  • RogueAgentRogueAgent
    Posts: 12,526
    What was this thread about again? 8-}
  • ClarkDevlinClarkDevlin Martinis, Girls and Guns
    Posts: 15,423
    Let's not wake up the beasts, ole boy. ;)
Sign In or Register to comment.