It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
"It's going to be a great movie. We've got a great director Sam Mendes and I'm very excited about the script. I'm going to be very suave in it."
http://www.independent.ie/entertainment/film-cinema/how-i-made-007-mad-very-mad-2855998.html
I agree. I wasn't enthused about this dialogue at all. I think the dialogue in QOS is superior to that of CR. One of the few things I like about QOS, along with the level and wonderfully natural style of humour.
Anyway, I’m a fan of Craig, just not the intolerable abundance of action we got in QOS and the shoddy Brosnan flicks.
Even if he did tell everyone where his island was, it doesn't change the fact that he used some of the most sophisticated technology of the time (the kind that would require a PhD to understand) and still claimed that "science was never his strong suit".
Same guy at the beginning from Diamonds are Forever, but 99.9 per cent of all Bond fanatics are well aware of him
and of course, while we're at it, Karate school, Bond goes martial arts etc, follows on from the success of the aforementioned ETD the year before TMWTGG was released
Still don't understand why Lieutenant Hip drove off and left him behind to fend for himself after Moore broke out of the dojo center :-??
"Of course everybody has forgotten that now, because we've all fallen into that idiom in the way of presenting films. We always cut films in the way I did Dr. No, but at that time that was something completely different to do. If you looked at any films made before 1961, even American films, they always have the guy walking down the steps, through the gates, getting into the car and driving away. We don't do any of that anymore [laughs]. The fellow says he's going, and he's there."
The same technique Abel Gance used in 1927 for 'Napoleon'? Why do we credit the Bourne films for a technique that is decades old?
And while I wouldn't mind a bit more humor I don't want (sorry Dalton and others) an over the top bond film. Maybe because life is a bit more serious now for me I want a "bad ass Bond film"
Like the early Connery's the 2 Dalton films and the Craig films the kind of bond where as long as you don't piss him off or try and hurt England your OK but when you do Bond is coming for you and he will kill you and sleep with your hot mistress.
Bond theme, action sequences, Q, and moneypenney were not what i call Brosnanisms
When i said about Brosnanisms i'm telling about laziness of character development, smarmy face, pain face,stupid joke and lack of toughness...