It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Of course ladies with big boobies ! :D
Post of the day. Here here.
Wins they'll leave the country. ARE made to leave after the election. :D
That is not limited to the UK.
Before our 2013 elections, a LOT of people said they would flee the country if the Progress Party entered government. They did enter government and all those people are still around.
Country would fall apart without them ? It's all bluster no matter who wins they'll
Still be here.
So as a bonus for the rest of us it would be nice to see various "Z" list celebs
Being forced on to ships and told to sod off, you self important, self obsessed
Self lovers.
I don't care who they support.
One good reason to vote Labour. Maybe the only one so far. I still cannot forgive them yet for Iraq.
:D :D :D
That's what I miss most about the UK. British satire rules ok.
--> Labour
--> Scottish National Party, &
--> Liberal Democrats
???
We all know for a majority there needs to be a HM Government of 326 seats or more. These are the current seat projections:
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/ng-interactive/2015/feb/27/guardian-poll-projection
And so far the SNP is stable at around 55 seats, while Labour is stabile at 271 seats. Tories are now slightly loosing seats the past days, and are now also at 271 seats. But even if the Conservatives gain again, due to the "PM-bonus"-effect, they can never form a comfortable majority government.
So if this trend lingers in, a coalition government of Labour and SNP, perhaps with support from LD could very well be happening.
In any case, the Conservatives are right now with all options on the loosing side. Could this mean that the UK is finally pursueing a more progressive approach? For me as a Dutchman I'd love to see a Labour-SNP-LD-coalition government. If you need some advise on workable, stabile coalition governments, you can always ask The Netherlands ;-).
And I'd like to see a communist/ISIS government in Holland. I'm not sure you'd be quite so keen an advocate for this if it was your money that was going to be spunked on Irn Bru and triple heart bypasses when Sturgeon's coronation as Labour's puppet master takes place in a few weeks.
Anyway as to your question I think its unlikely to happen for several reasons:
1. It's looking increasingly likely that Labour + SNP will be there or thereabouts without the need to do a deal with the Lib Dems.
2. Their share of the vote having already dropped off a cliff since the halcyon 'I agree with Nick' days following lots of broken promises, can the Libs really turn their backs on the last 5 years as if it was nothing to do with them and join the opposition overnight without becoming a total laughing stock and further decimating their share of the vote?
3. It's debatable if the Libs will even get enough seats to make them a big enough block to have much influence anyway.
Always better than facilitating xenophobia :-). Let the dirty xenophobic UKIP do its campaign banter for the Tories for free. Her Majesty's new lap dog no :-)?
And in the meanwhile, what do the Tories REALLY have on offer for the long-term future? For the upcoming 30 to 50 years? Indeed, not much.
I agree on one thing with the Tories: You can not spend money if you don't have it. But I completely disagree with them HOW it should be spend otherwise.
Cutting down costs on many branches of the UK government? Perhaps. Even Health Care. But NOT THE FUTURE OF ECONOMY: Which is EDUCATION. What the Tories did in the past years is nothing short of a destructive force, in which they enlarged the class-divide in terms of education.
Although it's not going to happen, a coalition government of Labour-SNP-LD should have a more realistic approach then just a one-party government. I'm glad the days are over that either Labour or Tories could rule those......Brittanic Waves. They now need to struck deals!
You over. They're all " snake oil" salesmen. :(
So I presume you also consider Australia to be a dirty, xenophobic country for all UKIP have done is propose the same points based immigration system that is implemented down under?
Anyway I'm not voting for UKIP. They're led by a Thatcherite who wants to scrap race relation laws and then they also want to scrap maternity leave, scrap minimum wage for apprentices, privatize the NHS, etc. I dunno who I'm gonna vote for but it's certainly not gonna be them.
Cameron strikes me as way too liberal. :-?? This is most often the case. The less of them the better.
So hard to find good sensible, small gov, low tax leadership, with an appreciation for market driven economies.
Before last years election, the Lib Dems thought they could promise a lot without having to deliver... until the election when neither Labour nor the Conservatives (Tories) got a majority and they sided with the Tories to form a coalition. Suddenly they found themselves in a position where they had to act on their promises and they couldn't.
It made Nick Clegg and his party look bad -
For example: they promised that they wouldn't allow tuition fees - We got tuition fees up to £3000. They then promised that they would stop any further raises in tuition fees - tuition fees raised to £9000.
Now it looks highly likely that whichever of the two major parties get the most votes, they won't get enough for an outright government - the minor parties are having to look hard at their policies to see which they can deliver if they get the chance to go into coalition with which ever party.