It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
Where has Dan's right of veto been for the last 3 films with Sony products at every juncture, not to mention the shocking Ford (hardly the best money can buy) commercial in the middle of CR? And where were Mendes principles when we had the infamous 5 minute Omega changing gear shot in SF?
Or once you hit the billion dollar mark is there a clause in your contract that means you can now have a say in all these things and the producers have to listen to you?
I suspect it's something along these lines, not so much a change in his contract but rather money talks, and he's done his part to right the ship as it were, so he gets more of a say.....along with perhaps his apparent increasing creative control over Bond projects these days.
I agree about the Fords.
I can see a lot coming out as the media search through everything and it should all be in one place, with danger of unwanted information being discussed.
Huh, didn't know you drank warm... *mi6 mods aiming their guns at me a la "Goldeneye" tanker room*
... Warm bodily fluids which particularly happen to be a yellowish hue.
Make sure you search on a Sony, they are the best.
I think you're mixing with the Sony *ads*, not the movies. They would not ask to re-write the movie so that it's Q who is using the phone, not Bond. They were planning a few months ago to have Ben Wishaw in the Sony ads around the release of SP, and no more Craig like for the previous ones.
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/133657
"I will call you Monday morning your time, but here are my thoughts. Legally EON is required to negotiate with us first and is not permitted to take offers from any other party. I believe that the Samsung offer was unsolicited but cannot be certain of this. "
https://wikileaks.org/sony/emails/emailid/122734
Well to me it means :
Before :
"We never paid anything to have Bond uses a Sony phone in the movies, but we committed to run a multimillion campaign advertising our phone and Bond. We paid $5M Craig to be in the ads"
Now :
"Barbara wants money now. Well, let's give her the $4M she wants as a product placement fee, and we'll make the ads with Ben Wishaw instead of Craig, we'll give Wishaw only $1M.. or less !"
We'll see if the next Sony Bond ads (the night break-in, the slow mo explosion) has Craig or Wishaw...
Because that wouldn't look odd on screen - random blurs on technology. They can't expect only one technological brand in the Bond universe.
Another email has Amy Pascal saying that (and I'm paraphrasing) "Bond 24 is our last film, but I can't see why they won't have us back, no other studio would give them the creative control that we do" - she was saying that Sony were basically "silent partners" who didn't force anything on EON. Hmmm.