It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
I find it highly hypocritical to demand Trump to step down from the race when Clinton got busy in the oval office with an intern.
It is even worse when Republican's who tried to remove Clinton from office for how many years? 4, 5? are now calling Trump a sexist.
Half of all Republicans over 50 have the same mindset as Trump, especially those in the Tea Party.
Not saying here what Trump said or did is in any way ok. He is a pig quite frankly.
Only one president has had his knob polished in the Oval Office that I'm aware of, and that was Slick Willy himself. I was completely against the witch hunt that the Republicans launched during the 90's however.
As far as I was concerned, his private matters were his business. I didn't like that he lied about it though.
:))
For all his private excursions and lust driven mistakes, it remains that Kennedy was an honorable, brave and transparent man that hated the direction the world was turning in, that being one of great secrecy in government, disrespect of the public and foolish wars fought on foreign soil. He would be furious to see us now.
Why?
He seems to condemn the western meddling in the Middle East, and I've not noticed him slagging Iran. He also seems conciliatory to wards Russia - in contrast to the current govt who seem to be doing all they can to provoke Russia. Has he said anything about China?
I'm not particularly trying to defend Trump, just genuinely curious
Why don't we turn the whole process on it's head and make them vote for us. We tell them what they want to hear, and they vote for us. I don't know how that would work exactly, but it has got to be better than having those two as the only candidates.
If you've heard the man speak words, good words- the best words in fact, and you are still curious, then nothing I can say will enlighten you. :))
You just don't get it do you? Trump is a classic populist. That means he says whatever he thinks people want to hear. In hindsight people have understood meddling in the middle east was a mistake, so of course Trump claims to have been against it all along, although HE supported the war on Iraq and HE pushed for intervention in Libya. Now of course he blames Clinton and Obama for it... Its all lies, nothing more. Based on previous statements he is as war hungry as any general.
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet" data-lang="en"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">All it takes is 3 out of every 100 Trump supporters to flip to Clinton for this to turn into a double-digit blowout.</p>— (((Harry Enten))) (@ForecasterEnten) <a href="
<script async src="//platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
http://us.cnn.com/2016/10/09/opinions/trump-tape-doesnt-matter-opinion-robbins/index.html
I know, it's from 'Clinton's' News Network, but I don't give a damn. There are quite some good points in it. Obviously the writer wants Clinton to win, but the writer is realistic enough that a Trump win is still possible, even after 'Pussygate'. Call it a warning of some sort.
I first read that as Donald Duck! =))
It's been shocking to me, after the debate, to hear so many saying Trump matched Clinton or "saved face."
What I saw was an utter, inarguable, poor and downright embarrassing performance from this so-called "Alpha Male" (more like Zed Male).
In a debate where Clinton kept on message, diverted her answers away from ad hominem personal attacks (the Trump method) to the actual issues of the people who this town hall was for, spoke directly to the people, looked them in the eyes and called them by name, we had Trump interrupting, being disrespectful, piggish and endlessly insulting to the moderators and his opponent, and stalking Clinton on the floor like a dreaded peeping tom or droning around his chair in circles like he was lost.
His message was poor when he actually answered the questions and didn't divert from saying anything of substance (which he failed to actually do 90% of the damn time), his body language was laughable and made that of Bush Sr.'s during his town hall with Clinton look stoic and in command by comparison. Trump never allowed Hillary the floor to speak, outwardly walked in her space and refused to give her the respect she gave him the entire debate, as she always gave him the room to speak his mind, however erroneous the comments were that were flying out of his mouth.
If the first debate showed a shaky performance from Trump (so say the media), this one should be called a downright level 5 Richter scale earthquake that could see him fall in between the monolithic cracks that have continued to form in his "campaign" between now and debate 3.
For those that still choose to stand with this absolute embarrassment to this nation and to our homo sapiens species as a whole, you deserve to face the full brunt of all the mistakes your decision to elect Trump would bring to all our doorsteps.
What a fucking world this is.
Paul Ryan has tough days ahead. Does he choose to reluctantly continue supporting Trump for the good of his party while singlehandedly disgracing the family and party values he says he represents, or does he stand up and speak out against the wrongs he sees spilling out of Trump, even if it ultimately damages the standing of him and his political party forever afterward?
I bet he tearfully misses the days when he was only known as Romney's running mate, and not in the whipping position he's made for himself during this race. I almost feel sorry for him. Almost...