It looks like you're new here. If you want to get involved, click one of these buttons!
^ Back to Top
The MI6 Community is unofficial and in no way associated or linked with EON Productions, MGM, Sony Pictures, Activision or Ian Fleming Publications. Any views expressed on this website are of the individual members and do not necessarily reflect those of the Community owners. Any video or images displayed in topics on MI6 Community are embedded by users from third party sites and as such MI6 Community and its owners take no responsibility for this material.
James Bond News • James Bond Articles • James Bond Magazine
Comments
references?
hahahahahaha.....NO! they all died!
it's a lot to take in, all those grand sets, the wonderful music, the insane amount of stars...
...all the past and future Bond actors...
I laughed in places, but mostly I was too mesmerized by the sets and fascinated by what's going on in general to laugh....I did have a constant grin on my face though!!
Well, I have to let it sink in but this got to be a future favorite watch for me, at least once a year yes.
I'm certainly going to watch it a second time soon though, there's so much I've probably missed the first time around.
If anything I would criticize just now, then maybe that the film is almost overloaded visually. But hey....I LOVED IT.
I've not seen CR67 yet and must get to it in 2018.
He also played the Frankenstein Monster in two different Hammer horrors.
Now I'm in the mood for CR and have it playing................
M and William Holden are on their way to Sir James' mansion.
Still I resent the fact that in light of the Craig era there are tons of people who think the code name is official. I just had that ridiculous discussion with someone the day who thought it was clever to imply Craig, Brosnan, etc were all distinctly different characters.
Still, here I like picturing Niven's Bond having been a spy during WWII and during Ian's time.